Conquer Club

Senfive, you can't make demands like that. IMO there was nothing scummy about that, just a private joke.

Now you can write a 100 word essay on the mating season of the spider monkey.

Oops, CONFIRM!!!!!

Vote KwiwTaker for not having a reason why. Hey, if you do it to me, I'll do it to them

ExplainThis wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:

ExplainThis wrote:unvote vote lsu

Now this you'll need to "justify" as I had already done my justification on mac just didn't bold the damn thing when I had unvoted and voted him.

Well this is interesting. It terns out i missed the post where you originally voted him, so the last two posts of yours where what I based it on which felt unnatural on its own. But bandwagonning isn't the answer to bandwagoning, and I don't like how nonchalant you were with this reply. Now I have torn feelings with regards to unvoting. eh Unvote.

Can you please explain to me how placing the "FIRST" vote on someone is "bandwagoning" on someone. I simply stated that his choosing to do so was a valid reason for me to switch my original random vote to someone that wants to do that.

Macalester wrote:Senfive, you can't make demands like that. IMO there was nothing scummy about that, just a private joke.

Now you can write a 100 word essay on the mating season of the spider monkey.

Sticking up for a Scummy partner already are you macalester? He voted again without unvoting and even responding to what I wrote. Definately scummy!!!

animorpherv1 wrote:Vote KwiwTaker for not having a reason why. Hey, if you do it to me, I'll do it to them

In your original response that you have still yet to write, you can add on to why macalester is sticking up for you.

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Can you please explain to me how placing the "FIRST" vote on someone is "bandwagoning" on someone. I simply stated that his choosing to do so was a valid reason for me to switch my original random vote to someone that wants to do that.

In a game this size I hardly consider the second or third to be bandwagonning either, so I assumed you meant it in a less strict sense, as in throwing around ones vote.

jnd94 wrote:unvote....

EBWOP

Macalester wrote:Senfive, you can't make demands like that. IMO there was nothing scummy about that, just a private joke.

Now you can write a 100 word essay on the mating season of the spider monkey.

Would the mating season of the spider monkey really require 100 words?

Spider monkeys mate year round.

Tada!

IM GONNA COME AT YOU LIKE A SPIRE MONKEY CHIP!!
did you hear that, like a spider monkey, LIKE A SPIDER MONKEY
i may be 12 years old but i can beat your arse.
im gonna scissor kick you in the back of the head
IM ALL JACKED UP ON MOUNTAIN DEW

are u gonna let them talk to their granddad like that?
of coarse i am chip, cause their winners, and winners get to do what ever they want.
the only thing you ever did good was make a hot daughter, thats it THAT IS IT!

If we wanted a bunch of sissy we would of named them Dr Quinn, and Medicine Woman okay

Oh come here your making me so hot
*makes out*

oh ill hold your hair!

best scene in a movie!!

ah anyway back to the game

Whilst senfive makes an interesting point, I think its unfair to demand 50 words or so from each person in defences etc. Seems slightly daft in my opinion to force people into writing long defences purely because they did something that you disagree with. However, I will swing my vote onto Macalaster because hes immediately struck a scummy vibe with me..

And mac, I always get edgy around bandwagons on me, especially when there is a lot of new players in this game and I know how they can escalate quickly from beyond a joke..

Unvote Vote Macalaster.

SenFive- my first vote didn't count, it wasn't voted

oops, not voted, bolded

I say we lynch someone that might be or is useless. The only way we'll learn something is if we take a risk.

william18 wrote:I say we lynch someone that might be or is useless. The only way we'll learn something is if we take a risk.

ok

unvote vote william

cena-rules wrote:

william18 wrote:I say we lynch someone that might be or is useless. The only way we'll learn something is if we take a risk.

ok

unvote vote william

Thats a cocky move. Well see what happens next

Ohh and by the way cena your still in my mafia game.

william18 wrote:

cena-rules wrote:

william18 wrote:I say we lynch someone that might be or is useless. The only way we'll learn something is if we take a risk.

ok

unvote vote william

Thats a cocky move. Well see what happens next

Ohh and by the way cena your still in my mafia game.

f*ck that

replace me

unvote vote skoffin for trying to start a bandwagon i guess no other ideas atm.

I'm doing the same as above poster


unvote & vote skoffin for trying to bandwagon, most likely on me

You might not know, but That's not helping.