[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
Conquer Club • World too populated? - Page 4
Page 4 of 8

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:19 pm
by Chris7He
Image

LOLZ...

Overpopulation is bound to cause disease and I think it's time to cull the masses. I say we start out with STDs and then expand to genetic defects and then to anybody with a communicable disease.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:19 pm
by Mr_Adams
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.


And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.


Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.


Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?


Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.


I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews! Image


You Nazi Bastard! I say we start curbing the population problem by builing a Guilatine and testing it on you! :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :evil:

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:20 pm
by Frigidus
Chris7He wrote:Image

LOLZ...

Overpopulation is bound to cause disease and I think it's time to cull the masses. I say we start out with STDs and then expand to genetic defects and then to anybody with a communicable disease.


Fine, I'll give it to you, but only if you include the Jews. [-(

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:21 pm
by Mr_Adams

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:21 pm
by muy_thaiguy
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.


And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.


Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.


Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?


Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.


I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews! Image


You Nazi Bastard! I say we start curbing the population problem by builing a Guilatine and testing it on you! :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :evil:
Didn't the French try that during their revolution?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:21 pm
by Chris7He
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.


And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.


Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.


Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?


Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.


I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews! Image


You Nazi Bastard! I say we start curbing the population problem by builing a Guilatine and testing it on you! :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :evil:


That was a joke... :wink:

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:22 pm
by DaGip
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:23 pm
by Chris7He
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


Or more people to come up with a Final Solution to kill all sick people.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:25 pm
by Mr_Adams
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.


And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.


Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.


Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?


Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.


I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews! Image


You Nazi Bastard! I say we start curbing the population problem by builing a Guilatine and testing it on you! :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :evil:
Didn't the French try that during their revolution?











exactly, hey if evey post starts with a huge quote, will you eventualy end up with just a list of words in the very middle when the boxes get to small, or will the very center boxes stop shoing up?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:25 pm
by Frigidus
Mr_Adams wrote:http://www.fuk.co.uk/files/images/hitler.gif

where do you find these?


The intrawub! Also, chris, just checking, are you actually serious? If so I'm gonna have to sig this.

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:26 pm
by Neutrino
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:26 pm
by Mr_Adams
that answers my question!

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:26 pm
by Chris7He
Mr_Adams wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Chris7He wrote:
Hitler had a hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy. His only childhood friend August Kubizek described him as living in his own dreamworld. He managed to talk Kubizek into pooling their money to buy a lottery ticket. When Hitler failed to win the lottery he reacted violently, blaming the "entire social order".

I support Lenin more than Hitler. It was not just created by Hitler, but more by an assembly at Nuremberg. STDs are dangerous if left untreated and I think there should be mandatory testing and I'll improvise from there.


And you don't? You're advocating wholesale mass murder of something that is, in reality only ever a minor problem! War criminals deserve to die. Serial killers do. People with STD's do not.


Why not? I was thinking of a very peaceful end instead of the twisted wretched end they will face. Many people with AIDS cannot afford treatment (the majority live in Southern Africa). I say cull their numbers.


Again, rather than terminating them with extreme predjuce, why not put a little money towards a cure?


Cures take too much time and it's hard to administer, but this was a thread about OVERPOPULATION. I'm offering mass murder here...

Besides... with the way that the US healthcare system is so screwed up, we might as well build some internment camps for STD patients.


I think we're dancing around the issue too much. Overpopulation isn't the fault of disease...disease kills people! That helps! We all know who the real culprits are. That's right, the Jews! Image


You Nazi Bastard! I say we start curbing the population problem by builing a Guilatine and testing it on you! :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :evil:
Didn't the French try that during their revolution?











exactly, hey if evey post starts with a huge quote, will you eventualy end up with just a list of words in the very middle when the boxes get to small, or will the very center boxes stop shoing up?


They disappear

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:27 pm
by Mr_Adams
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:28 pm
by Chris7He
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


Mass murder my friends...

Ironically, my teacher asked me if she could use my poem calling Hate evil and an injustice in the school paper.

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:28 pm
by Chris7He
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


Mein Gott! Idiocy knows no bounds! If we are all using water, then where the hell will it come from? Our urine?

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:32 pm
by Neutrino
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:35 pm
by Frigidus
Neutrino wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.


Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:36 pm
by Chris7He
Fortunately for us, we have the Final Solution to take out sick people to back us up later on.

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:38 pm
by Neutrino
Frigidus wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.


Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.


Look a few posts up. 2% (IIRC) compounding annually dosen't sound like much, but over a century or so it is quite easy to double your population. A few more centuries and a few more doublings and the population shouldn't be too far off the several-hundred trillion max population of the solar system.

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:41 pm
by Chris7He
Neutrino wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.


Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.


Look a few posts up. 2% (IIRC) compounding annually dosen't sound like much, but over a century or so it is quite easy to double your population. A few more centuries and a few more doublings and the population shouldn't be too far off the several-hundred trillion max population of the solar system.


Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!

Re: World too populated?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:12 pm
by Nobunaga
Chris7He wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Heimdall wrote:The world population is getting close to 6 billion people. Is it too much in your opinion.

What are the benefits or problems of having this many people on the planet?


The benefits are that we got more people to think of ingenius ways to colonize other planets and other solar systems...


As I said before, with our current growth rates it is a mere few thousand years before humanity is using the entirety of the solar system's water.


water is a renewable resource dummy, nature does it for us, water can be recycles in a matter of months!


No, eventually all the water will be in use at any one time. It will all be being recycled or used.


Fortunately for us, there is no way we could grow enough food for our population to reach that level.


Look a few posts up. 2% (IIRC) compounding annually dosen't sound like much, but over a century or so it is quite easy to double your population. A few more centuries and a few more doublings and the population shouldn't be too far off the several-hundred trillion max population of the solar system.


Our population is growing at an exponential rate. The increases in growth are astronomical! Mass murder! Civil war! Whatever we can to bring it down!


.. Kill yourself.

...

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:14 pm
by Chris7He
Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to see the suffering and destruction if I did that would I...

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:16 pm
by Nobunaga
Chris7He wrote:Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to see the suffering and destruction if I did that would I...


... You're just being selfish now.

...

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:18 pm
by Chris7He
Nobunaga wrote:
Chris7He wrote:Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to see the suffering and destruction if I did that would I...


... You're just being selfish now.

...


I know.