Page 4 of 8
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:35 am
by magneticgoop
chargers loose
14 to 38
they were all too emotional and rushed everything. they wanted to have a rematch but they had way too much adrenaline pumping and didn't work as a team. they made stupid mistakes and poor coaching decisions. twice they were 4th and inches and they didn't go for it. it wouldn't have been that bad if it wasn't already 0-24.
well here's to an 15 and 1 season
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:43 am
by reverend_kyle
areyouincahoots wrote:misterman10 wrote:49ers (2-0)
Broncos (2-0)
Cowboys (2-0)
Colts (2-0)
Steelers (2-0)
Texans (2-0)
Lions (2-0)
[invisible ink]New England (2-0)
Packers (2-0)[/invisible ink]
Bolded:
The Broncos and Colts because I love them...
the Texans and Lions because who expected
that?
Invisible inked:
because I
HATE those teams!
I expected the texans.. they're my second favorite team and they've always got a good lineup just never can make anything out of it.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:48 am
by Iz Man
misterman10 wrote:49ers (2-0)
Broncos (2-0)
Cowboys (2-0)
Colts (2-0)
Steelers (2-0)
Texans (2-0)
Lions (2-0)
New England (2-0)
Packers (2-0)
niner's will be 2-1 after this sunday
might as well prepare for it now
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:33 pm
by misterman10
magneticgoop wrote:chargers loose
14 to 38
they were all too emotional and rushed everything. they wanted to have a rematch but they had way too much adrenaline pumping and didn't work as a team. they made stupid mistakes and poor coaching decisions. twice they were 4th and inches and they didn't go for it. it wouldn't have been that bad if it wasn't already 0-24.
well here's to an 15 and 1 season
and then another playoff elimination
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:35 pm
by misterman10
Iz Man wrote:misterman10 wrote:49ers (2-0)
Broncos (2-0)
Cowboys (2-0)
Colts (2-0)
Steelers (2-0)
Texans (2-0)
Lions (2-0)
New England (2-0)
Packers (2-0)
niner's will be 2-1 after this sunday
might as well prepare for it now
this made me laugh
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:56 pm
by Gold Knight
How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:59 pm
by misterman10
Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden. They've been more dominating than the donkies, thats all that matters
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:00 pm
by Gold Knight
misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if
Alex Smith will stop
sucking than the 49ers are golden. They've been more dominating than the donkies, thats all that matters
Ahhhh, those bold words belong together...
Just as i predicted...
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:06 pm
by misterman10
Gold Knight wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if
Alex Smith will stop
sucking than the 49ers are golden. They've been more dominating than the donkies, thats all that matters
Ahhhh, those bold words belong together...
Just as i predicted...
he may not be putting up big yards or TD's, but at least he isnt turning the ball over
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:31 pm
by Sackett58
Once again the Viking offense could not score more than the defense. I counted a win over Detroit for a winning record.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:37 pm
by Gold Knight
Sackett58 wrote:Once again the Viking offense could not score more than the defense. I counted a win over Detroit for a winning record.
I dunno, Detroit is tied for first in the North, who woulda guessed?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:21 pm
by misterman10
well, the redskins are now 2-0 as well
and the eagles 0-2
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:29 pm
by reverend_kyle
misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
exactly but he won't. And that's why the niners won't make the playoffs this year.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:31 pm
by misterman10
reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
exactly but he won't. And that's why the niners won't make the playoffs this year.
He's only going to get better. At least he isnt turning the ball over. With Frank Gore, I still think we can make the playoffs, it will just be a lot harder unless Smith starts producing.
and BTW, the Texans do look pretty good
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:33 pm
by reverend_kyle
misterman10 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
exactly but he won't. And that's why the niners won't make the playoffs this year.
He's only going to get better. At least he isnt turning the ball over. With Frank Gore, I still think we can make the playoffs, it will just be a lot harder unless Smith starts producing.
and BTW, the Texans do look pretty good
wait til he starts turning the ball over.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:33 pm
by misterman10
reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
exactly but he won't. And that's why the niners won't make the playoffs this year.
He's only going to get better. At least he isnt turning the ball over. With Frank Gore, I still think we can make the playoffs, it will just be a lot harder unless Smith starts producing.
and BTW, the Texans do look pretty good
wait til he starts turning the ball over.
..but he wont
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:19 am
by Iz Man
misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
If Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
.....and now he's going up against the Steelers D.
Yeah, he'll do well..........
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:27 am
by misterman10
Iz Man wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
If Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
.....and now he's going up against the Steelers D.
Yeah, he'll do well..........
Their pass d isn't all that great
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:21 am
by reverend_kyle
misterman10 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:misterman10 wrote:Gold Knight wrote:How bout Favre becoming the all time winningest QB MM10? And the Packers dominating in their 1st two games? I didnt see any domination out of the Niners, just that close game bullshit...
The packers look good, I must admit. But if Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
exactly but he won't. And that's why the niners won't make the playoffs this year.
He's only going to get better. At least he isnt turning the ball over. With Frank Gore, I still think we can make the playoffs, it will just be a lot harder unless Smith starts producing.
and BTW, the Texans do look pretty good
wait til he starts turning the ball over.
..but he wont
Quoting so we can all laugh at you later.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:19 pm
by Iz Man
misterman10 wrote:Iz Man wrote:misterman10 wrote:If Alex Smith will stop sucking than the 49ers are golden.
.....and now he's going up against the Steelers D.
Yeah, he'll do well..........
Their pass d isn't all that great
Lets see......how do they rank...........
Pittsburgh Steelers
Total D:
#3 @ 222 YPG
Passing D:
#3 @ 148 YPG
Rushing D:
#5 @ 74 YPG
San Fran
Total Offense:
#32 (that's dead last BTW) @ 190 YPG
Passing O:
#31 (that's almost dead last BTW) @ 99.5 YPG
Rushing O:
#23 @ 90.5 YPG
How many points do you think those 'niners are going to be able to score?
Pitt has scored 60 and given up 10 (that's best in the league BTW)
San Fran has scored 37 and given up 33.
The Steelers have the ball for 35:52 / game.
The 49'ers for ~26:45.
I'll wait for your response before I throw more stats your way.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:11 pm
by AK_iceman
Well, it's a good thing the underdog never wins.
49ers will win.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:07 pm
by reverend_kyle
AK_iceman wrote:49ers suck worse and that is why they'll win
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:55 pm
by misterman10
Lets see, who did the steelers play?
the browns
and
the bills
now what were you saying again?
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:28 pm
by reverend_kyle
The 49ers barely beat the cardinals
thats what I thought.
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:00 pm
by misterman10
reverend_kyle wrote:The 49ers barely beat the cardinals
thats what I thought.
Edgerrin James
Larry Fitzgerald
Anquan Boldin
Matt Leinart
Adrian Wilson
Antrell Rolle
Neil Rackers
Bryant Johnson