Conquer Club

Love you too Skoffin

I wonder how long it will take Aage to get in here, tell everyone off, and vote dakky.

Ragian wrote:I wonder how long it will take Aage to get in here, tell everyone off, and vote dakky.

how about I vote him right now so his vote will be omgus?

dakky21 wrote:

Ragian wrote:I wonder how long it will take Aage to get in here, tell everyone off, and vote dakky.

how about I vote him right now so his vote will be omgus?

do it

no dgz, i don't have anything against him yet.

Noted. Any preference Immortalis XS? And does your name mean a very small person that's immortal? *rimshot*

Haha not especially, though IXS or simply XS is the most common. And haha it's actually a very old gamertag from AvP Gold - Immortalis because i was very arrogant (though admittedly also good) at that game and was showing off, XS because that was the clan I was in

dakky, I too agree that that was a bizarre post, though i agree that the means of killing was likely simply flavor. however, one note about this comment:

there are probably no VT's and each role has a drawback.

there are NO VTs, as per strike wolf's original proposed game structure (emphasis mine):

Basically each player would be a power role but each power role would come with a potential 'screw you' type catch.

unrelated: holy crap there are a lot of acronyms!

Immortalis XS wrote:unrelated: holy crap there are a lot of acronyms!

The first post of this thread should help with that.

vote aage for having an old Danish man name. (I've probably used that before.)

Did dakky ever clarify why he wanted no one to talk about the setup and then talked about the setup?

I said I don't want to discuss the setup over 3 pages, but didn't say we can't briefly discuss it over, say, one page.

Why would you like to discuss it at all?

Ragian wrote:I wonder how long it will take Aage to get in here, tell everyone off, and vote dakky.

You know me so well.

vote Dakky

the banter votes are coming out.

if i was bothered to press Full Editor i might voted Ragian because he always ruins my games.

Vote Ragian

just so he feels that it could been a vote

Ragian wrote:Why would you like to discuss it at all?

Because some non-important talk can be useful later. For example dgz mentioned a setup with 3rd party, it can be just an assumption or it can mean he is 3rd party and/or knows there is 3rd party in the game. Some talk is ok, but I don't want 3 pages of it though as I already said because it just makes it harder to re-read later. That's it.

I can actually dig that. My eyes have officially left your smoking body.

On day 1 there isn't that much to go on. I know in my games I intentionally made it where those that tried to "play" the mod would have a hard time since I would give the scum a fair cover they could use or it could be a unique setup like I did with the Civil War where no one knew what was going on With that said, it is a lot better to reread when there is not too much cannon fodder in there about just speculation of the game setup instead of trying to read what is actually happening.

On day 1 there isn't that much to go on. I know in my games I intentionally made it where those that tried to "play" the mod would have a hard time since I would give the scum a fair cover they could use or it could be a unique setup like I did with the Civil War where no one knew what was going on With that said, it is a lot better to reread when there is not too much cannon fodder in there about just speculation of the game setup instead of trying to read what is actually happening.

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:On day 1 there isn't that much to go on. I know in my games I intentionally made it where those that tried to "play" the mod would have a hard time since I would give the scum a fair cover they could use or it could be a unique setup like I did with the Civil War where no one knew what was going on With that said, it is a lot better to reread when there is not too much cannon fodder in there about just speculation of the game setup instead of trying to read what is actually happening.

But what is actually happening? Nobody's dead (except poor Ga7 - God rest his soul), and no one knows anything except their individual roles and scummates. We can and will do baseless votes, but there's not much to be learned from a re-read of day 1 if it's just random votes flying back and forth. I'm not saying I want 3 pages of speculation about the setup, but while any player could have any role, there are practical limits as to what would work in a game, and I don't think it hurts to discuss it.

That said, vote aage because he was scum in both games I played with him.

dakky21 wrote:

Ragian wrote:Why would you like to discuss it at all?

Because some non-important talk can be useful later. For example dgz mentioned a setup with 3rd party, it can be just an assumption or it can mean he is 3rd party and/or knows there is 3rd party in the game. Some talk is ok, but I don't want 3 pages of it though as I already said because it just makes it harder to re-read later. That's it.

I'm just used to town of salem setups where there almost always is 3rd party.

standard there is

9 Town
4 Mafia
2 Neutral

Also LSU Tiger Josh likes to post every post twice

Also LSU Tiger Josh likes to post every post twice

degaston wrote:

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:On day 1 there isn't that much to go on. I know in my games I intentionally made it where those that tried to "play" the mod would have a hard time since I would give the scum a fair cover they could use or it could be a unique setup like I did with the Civil War where no one knew what was going on With that said, it is a lot better to reread when there is not too much cannon fodder in there about just speculation of the game setup instead of trying to read what is actually happening.

But what is actually happening? Nobody's dead (except poor Ga7 - God rest his soul), and no one knows anything except their individual roles and scummates. We can and will do baseless votes, but there's not much to be learned from a re-read of day 1 if it's just random votes flying back and forth. I'm not saying I want 3 pages of speculation about the setup, but while any player could have any role, there are practical limits as to what would work in a game, and I don't think it hurts to discuss it.

That said, vote aage because he was scum in both games I played with him.

If one disregards the fact that in every game, everyone has the same chance of securing a scum role, in order to follow your reasoning, wouldn't it make more sense, given that aage has been scum twice, that he wasn't scum this time round?

Don't bring your odds here.

in games like this it's all about the perceived odds

Perception can become reality and yes for some reason it likes to submit my posts twice. I just don't delete them since everything is suppose to stand in the game