Conquer Club

ohhh....between me and herpes.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:ohhh....between me and herpes.

a choice forced upon many a lady.

Where is the jork option?

Also, since when is Johnny 'tooting his horn' Rocket so popular?

This poll... it is making my head implode.

trapyoung wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:ohhh....between me and herpes.

a choice forced upon many a lady.

What happened to all GLG's fans? Weird.

nagerous wrote:Where is the jork option?

Also, since when is Johnny 'tooting his horn' Rocket so popular?

This poll... it is making my head implode.

6 years of pawning opponents takes it toll

codeblue1018 wrote:What happened to all GLG's fans? Weird.

His CC funds were all spent on round 1 voting and the PAC money is now gone. lol

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:6 years of pawning opponents takes it toll

You pledge opponents as collateral?

nagerous wrote:Where is the jork option?

I think Jork was another one of those who were #1 before the Conqueror symbol was released with Gibbom

Leehar wrote:

nagerous wrote:Where is the jork option?

I think Jork was another one of those who were #1 before the Conqueror symbol was released with Gibbom

Correct. Another top notch, friendly player that up and left. Best triples player this site has ever seen. Pity.

how come [player]Bondra[/player] is not in the poll? or [player]FloOo[/player]?

greenoaks wrote:how come [player]Bondra[/player] is not in the poll? or [player]FloOo[/player]?

Did you completely miss my comment on only the #1's with the Conqueror title attached being recognised as such?

Leehar wrote:

greenoaks wrote:how come [player]Bondra[/player] is not in the poll? or [player]FloOo[/player]?

Did you completely miss my comment on only the #1's with the Conqueror title attached being recognised as such?

yep

Blitz. C&A case notwithstanding, he was a damn good all-around player and I personally never had any issues with his lists.

safariguy5 wrote:Blitz. C&A case notwithstanding, he was a damn good all-around player and I personally never had any issues with his lists.

Blitz has always been a great player and i have a lot of respect for the guy. I to was a fan of his lists...and while i think he had good intentions a few minor changes could have been made in order to avoid as many people thinking he was maintaining the lists for his own gloating as he was the top dog in a lot of categories. I dont think that is why he made the lists...but i do think many saw it that way and got annoyed. I remember in my younger years thinking how awesome it would be to be on one of them and it gave me a sort of excitement. It would be really cool if CC staff in some way kept track of some of those records or if lack made a way to automatically keep certain records and have them displayed somewhere. Blitz has done a lot for this site weather people like him or not and is one of the greats for team games.

I'm going with poo-maker. He wasn't afraid of tournaments with his exceptionally high rank, and I respect that (there may be others that also aren't, but his name sticks out to me for it).

ljex wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:Blitz. C&A case notwithstanding, he was a damn good all-around player and I personally never had any issues with his lists.

Blitz has always been a great player and i have a lot of respect for the guy. I to was a fan of his lists...and while i think he had good intentions a few minor changes could have been made in order to avoid as many people thinking he was maintaining the lists for his own gloating as he was the top dog in a lot of categories. I dont think that is why he made the lists...but i do think many saw it that way and got annoyed. I remember in my younger years thinking how awesome it would be to be on one of them and it gave me a sort of excitement. It would be really cool if CC staff in some way kept track of some of those records or if lack made a way to automatically keep certain records and have them displayed somewhere. Blitz has done a lot for this site weather people like him or not and is one of the greats for team games.

I don't think the lists were the tarnish on the crown as much as the fall from grace when he was caught using his babysitting accounts for his own gain. Other than that one slip, he would have made this poll and this thread redundant.

JRock

codeblue1018 wrote:

Leehar wrote:

nagerous wrote:Where is the jork option?

I think Jork was another one of those who were #1 before the Conqueror symbol was released with Gibbom

Correct. Another top notch, friendly player that up and left. Best triples player this site has ever seen. Pity.

Yep Jork was a great player , very friendly and modest as well .

my favorite conquer would be the one who excepts all challenges and not just the ones from his cronies or the noobs he or she is farming

General lee accepts all challenges and takes no prisoners

truckdog wrote:General lee accepts all challenges and takes no prisoners

Bahahahaha

truckdog wrote:General lee accepts all challenges and takes no prisoners

I think truckdog actually believes this, but the sarcasm is truly witty..+1

Codeblue is my favorite person who has been brig at least 5 times. Shit ratings or not, those old chats were hilarious.

truckdog wrote:General lee accepts all challenges and takes no prisoners

Well of COURSE he accepts all challenges from you...you're a one-striper.

They have never played each other...