Conquer Club

safariguy5 wrote:I like how Zoidberg runs by their embassy after he eats the flag. The Globetrotter one looked groovy.

Need a good diplomat for your embassy? Why not Zoidberg?

safariguy5 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:

edocsil wrote:Pink is close enough. Your souls belong to ME!

Hate to break it to ya, babe, but pink is kind of a...feminine color...

-Sully

A female Devil? I don't suppose Lucifer is really a succubus.

See, what people don't know is his her name is actually Lucy, not Lucifer. I guess it got lost in translation somewhere along the line.

-Sully

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

Oh! The horror! The obscenity! I've been caught red-handed, pants bunched up around my ankles, with the crumbs on my shirt as it were, by these prodigious sleuthing skills!

Sir, I believe an obligatory omgus is in order here, but I can't argue with that logic.

But in all seriousness, whom do we lynch?

btw I'm gonna go ahead and unvote, so I'm doing my part to shift into next gear.

-Tails

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

Oh! The horror! The obscenity! I've been caught red-handed, pants bunched up around my ankles, with the crumbs on my shirt as it were, by these prodigious sleuthing skills!

Sir, I believe an obligatory omgus is in order here, but I can't argue with that logic.

But in all seriousness, whom do we lynch?
scum

btw I'm gonna go ahead and unvote, so I'm doing my part to shift into next gear.

-Tails

Reply in cyan

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

the ironic part is that the majority of all day 1 cases (especially early) tend to be the inactive. In all honesty, I'm starting to feel the people who tend to continue on with the joke phase after someone brings up a semi-serious post tend to be more scummy.

VioIet wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:

edocsil wrote:Pink is close enough. Your souls belong to ME!

Hate to break it to ya, babe, but pink is kind of a...feminine color...

-Sully

Oh hi vio.

jonty125 wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

Oh! The horror! The obscenity! I've been caught red-handed, pants bunched up around my ankles, with the crumbs on my shirt as it were, by these prodigious sleuthing skills!

Sir, I believe an obligatory omgus is in order here, but I can't argue with that logic.

But in all seriousness, whom do we lynch?
scum

btw I'm gonna go ahead and unvote, so I'm doing my part to shift into next gear.

-Tails

Reply in cyan

And Jonty.

Commander9 wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:I like how Zoidberg runs by their embassy after he eats the flag. The Globetrotter one looked groovy.

Need a good diplomat for your embassy? Why not Zoidberg?

:E

the ironic part is that the majority of all day 1 cases (especially early) tend to be the inactive. In all honesty, I'm starting to feel the people who tend to continue on with the joke phase after someone brings up a semi-serious post tend to be more scummy.

Yes, but I can also joke outside of the joke phase too. And generally, ignoring a legitimate case is pretty scummy anyway (not that I think the majority of Day 1 cases are legitimate).

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

Oh! The horror! The obscenity! I've been caught red-handed, pants bunched up around my ankles, with the crumbs on my shirt as it were, by these prodigious sleuthing skills!

Sir, I believe an obligatory omgus is in order here, but I can't argue with that logic.

But in all seriousness, whom do we lynch?

btw I'm gonna go ahead and unvote, so I'm doing my part to shift into next gear.

-Tails

You pretty much just made your last post again. Why are you asking someone else to make a case for you?

When in doubt, I go with the standard pressuring the inactive.

unvote vote naxus

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:

icedagger wrote:

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Sadly, I have nothing further because we're still in joke phase.

Pfft. If you really wanted to exit the joke phase you could over-analyse someone's post. You could, just as an example, infer from the post that said poster was in fact perfectly happy to stay in the joke phase. You could then try to exert pressure on the posUnvote Vote tailter.

Oh! The horror! The obscenity! I've been caught red-handed, pants bunched up around my ankles, with the crumbs on my shirt as it were, by these prodigious sleuthing skills!

Sir, I believe an obligatory omgus is in order here, but I can't argue with that logic.

But in all seriousness, whom do we lynch?

btw I'm gonna go ahead and unvote, so I'm doing my part to shift into next gear.

-Tails

You pretty much just made your last post again. Why are you asking someone else to make a case for you?

Because I have no solid suspicions yet. Don't worry, when I have some ideas I'll post them. Is that ok with you?

-Tails

safariguy5 wrote:When in doubt, I go with the standard pressuring the inactive.

unvote vote naxus

I can go with that for now.

vote Naxus

I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

Votes

Naxus (3) ~ Victor, MeDeFe, Safari
Tailgunner (1) ~ Icedagger
Icedagger (2) ~ Strike, Naxus
Safari (1) ~ Rodion


12 alive 7 to lynch
No deadline yet

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

What does TFO stand for

jonty125 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

What does TFO stand for

TheForgivenOne, must be in reference to MeDeFe or me also being a mod.

safariguy5 wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

What does TFO stand for

TheForgivenOne, must be in reference to MeDeFe or me also being a mod.

Probably me because of inverted ponies.

MeDeFe wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

What does TFO stand for

TheForgivenOne, must be in reference to MeDeFe or me also being a mod.

Probably me because of inverted ponies.

Didn't you guys know? The answer is always always inverted ponies.

-Sully

I always thought the answer was 42.

I don't think I've seen Naxus on in a few days so I won't join the inactive bandwagon quite yet. I know it was a minor suspicion anyways but I would like to hear Jonty and vio's comments about what I said earlier.

MeDeFe wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

Victor Sullivan wrote:I'll go with the other TFO on this one: Vote naXus

-Sully

What does TFO stand for

TheForgivenOne, must be in reference to MeDeFe or me also being a mod.

Probably me because of inverted ponies.

That clears things up

Jonty, Strike called you out one post before yours.

Care to comment on that instead of on the pony/avatar thing?

(and yes, TFO is known for sporting the pony avatar and now Medefe is doing the same)

Also unvote my joke vote.

Rodion wrote:Jonty, Strike called you out one post before yours.

Care to comment on that instead of on the pony/avatar thing?

(and yes, TFO is known for sporting the pony avatar and now Medefe is doing the same)

what Rodion said. Also apparently I never got around to saying this in thread anyways but I will be on a bit more than I expected to this week.

Rodion wrote:Jonty, Strike called you out one post before yours.

Care to comment on that instead of on the pony/avatar thing?

(and yes, TFO is known for sporting the pony avatar and now Medefe is doing the same)

Yes I do, I aren't going to jump on the naxus bandwagon unless a better case comes along (and it better come soon because of this)

Rules wrote:8. Lengths of days is 14 days.

We have about 55 hours from now based on this D1 opening scene viewtopic.php?f=213&t=151755&start=30#p3353011

If strike thinks I'm scummy for taking the joke-voting stage too long or after its completion. Well, I would like to apologise if I appeared hindering towns day-time discussion.

jonty125 wrote:

Rodion wrote:Jonty, Strike called you out one post before yours.

Care to comment on that instead of on the pony/avatar thing?

(and yes, TFO is known for sporting the pony avatar and now Medefe is doing the same)

Yes I do, I aren't going to jump on the naxus bandwagon unless a better case comes along (and it better come soon because of this)

Rules wrote:8. Lengths of days is 14 days.

We have about 55 hours from now based on this D1 opening scene viewtopic.php?f=213&t=151755&start=30#p3353011

If strike thinks I'm scummy for taking the joke-voting stage too long or after its completion. Well, I would like to apologise if I appeared hindering towns day-time discussion.

I had forgotten that I said 2 weeks for a day. In my last VC i said there wasn't a DL, so putting one in for just over two days from now would be unfair IMO. This does have to keep moving however, so I will say DL in 96 hours (4 days)

jonty125 wrote:

Rodion wrote:Jonty, Strike called you out one post before yours.

Care to comment on that instead of on the pony/avatar thing?

(and yes, TFO is known for sporting the pony avatar and now Medefe is doing the same)

Yes I do, I aren't going to jump on the naxus bandwagon unless a better case comes along (and it better come soon because of this)

Rules wrote:8. Lengths of days is 14 days.

We have about 55 hours from now based on this D1 opening scene viewtopic.php?f=213&t=151755&start=30#p3353011

If strike thinks I'm scummy for taking the joke-voting stage too long or after its completion. Well, I would like to apologise if I appeared hindering towns day-time discussion.

Of course, apologies don't mean a damn thing if you're lying, so...yeah. FoS jonty - you're up there on the D1 lynch list IMO

-Sully

So 89 hours till deadline. I'm not sure if my case on jonty holds enough weight to really lynch him. I would like to have heard more than an apology from him, those tend to strike me more of admissions of guilt than innocence at the least though. On the other hand there's the inactive wagon which will probably be what we end up happening anyways. Naxus from what I've seen seems to be completely inactive right now so I don't expect a response and vio is absent at the moment as well (there are probably one or two others who have actually been gone longer but vio catches my attention because she was another one I implicated along with jonty).