Conquer Club

Master Bush wrote:I vote fircoal

He threw out a vote for chessplaya on page 2, and never mentioned it was randomvote.org or whatever it's called. Then said a page later, that that's why he voted for him, then on the next sentence said it was because he cant understand him. What I cant understand is why he voted for him, then threw out 2 diffenet reasons why, the first he didn't mention when he first voted for him.

After reading 5 pages, that's all I have come up with.

that's pretty weird....

FOS Fircoal.....


i know it seems like im "bandwagonning". im not, i didnt realize that until MB pointed it out...

Master Bush wrote:I vote fircoal

He threw out a vote for chessplaya on page 2, and never mentioned it was randomvote.org or whatever it's called. Then said a page later, that that's why he voted for him, then on the next sentence said it was because he cant understand him. What I cant understand is why he voted for him, then threw out 2 diffenet reasons why, the first he didn't mention when he first voted for him.

After reading 5 pages, that's all I have come up with.

I never mentioned random.org was the reason why I voted him, I just said it's good to use. Also I said it's a random vote, this happened in another game, if I give off a semi-random vote, I count it has random.

fircoal wrote:It's not either, I picked a random vote, and decided you, because sometimes I can't under what you are saying.

After reading it again, he didn't use randomvote.org, but he still claimed it to be a random vote. But he didn't explain when he first voted, and still said it's because he cant understand him.

Master Bush u might have a point there but then again fircoal said my vote to u chessplaya will stand until some suspiscious comes up to my mind so i think it was really random as he said well i hope so at least

Master Bush wrote:

fircoal wrote:It's not either, I picked a random vote, and decided you, because sometimes I can't under what you are saying.

After reading it again, he didn't use randomvote.org, but he still claimed it to be a random vote. But he didn't explain when he first voted, and still said it's because he cant understand him.

MY definition of a random vote is an early vote on based on anything or something unrelated like I said. It's bound to change so it bears no importance on the game. I'm too lazy to bring up random.org right now, so I picked a vote on close to nothing. Do you have a problem with that.

Fircoal wrote:Do you have a problem with that.

Yes, cause I dont like random votes. If you have nothing solid to vote someone, then dont vote, unless of course it's a joke vote.

for now unvote fircoal

fos fircoal

The problem with this is that many mafia memebrs choose to say little so that they don't give much away.

The1exile wrote:The problem with this is that many mafia memebrs choose to say little so that they don't give much away.

But that gives it away too.

Not in largers games... for examples right now I don't have much of a lead and I'm not a believer in initial random votes, so I might not say much, but I'm not mafia.

The1exile wrote:The problem with this is that many mafia memebrs choose to say little so that they don't give much away.

Wrong. I have played in many of these games now, and you can't go on that. Cause in each game there a list of certain players, that goes like this:

Good townie players who talk alot
Good mafia players who talk alot
dumb townie players who talk alot
dumb mafia players who talk alot
newbie townie player that doesn't talk much at all
newbie mafia player that doesn't talk much at all

The best bet, is to look at who was killed on night 1 (or 0) and ask why they were killed?

Master Bush wrote:
The best bet, is to look at who was killed on night 1 (or 0) and ask why they were killed?

This is a good point. I wonder who puff protected if he died using his role. Unfortunately we do not have this information, and we cannot ask him in his grave. Time for a seance!

It's very hard to make much of last night's killing...starting with night, the mafia probably choose their victim at random...and we don't know who that intended victim was.

well i say that ppl has to start showing up and posting in this thread or else we gonna end up killing each other. the 6 or 7 players who already posted and we might be all innocent so i think its better to start lynching players that never posted this way at least we know if they r townies they r useless not trying to help and if they are mafia we have them down

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:can we stop with the random.org votes, those are stupid...

btw i fos everyone

They are not stupid they're better then No lynch, and how do you start a day without suspicious, we need random.org votes.

well yeah they better than no lynch, so you say the chance of 2-4/23 to lynch a mafia is better than no lynch? then we lynch nearly always a townie
8,7-17,4% that we lynch a mafia...

i Vote: Fircoal

I believe Puff was killed out of spite.. Whom here has played with Puff and commented on his 'noobness'?


-X

chessplaya wrote:well i say that ppl has to start showing up and posting in this thread or else we gonna end up killing each other. the 6 or 7 players who already posted and we might be all innocent so i think its better to start lynching players that never posted this way at least we know if they r townies they r useless not trying to help and if they are mafia we have them down

Don't be reckless...people have trouble getting online sometimes...no need to consider lynching anyone until we have let everyone had their say. Hypothetically, if I were to vote you,chessplaya, everyone who comes in late will skip through all my reasoning, good or bad, and vote with me because they are too lazy to read. My opinion, gather evidence as more people start to post, then you will vote better.

Wisse wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:can we stop with the random.org votes, those are stupid...

btw i fos everyone

They are not stupid they're better then No lynch, and how do you start a day without suspicious, we need random.org votes.

well yeah they better than no lynch, so you say the chance of 2-4/23 to lynch a mafia is better than no lynch? then we lynch nearly always a townie
8,7-17,4% that we lynch a mafia...

i Vote: Fircoal

It's a vote that you make suspicion. You don't keep the vote on for the whole game.

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:can we stop with the random.org votes, those are stupid...

btw i fos everyone

They are not stupid they're better then No lynch, and how do you start a day without suspicious, we need random.org votes.

well yeah they better than no lynch, so you say the chance of 2-4/23 to lynch a mafia is better than no lynch? then we lynch nearly always a townie
8,7-17,4% that we lynch a mafia...

i Vote: Fircoal

It's a vote that you make suspicion. You don't keep the vote on for the whole game.

how do you mean? the day is not over yet you know? i can always unvote you, i don't understand what you just did say

im gonna VOTE Fircoal....


sorry, man, but ur pretty suspicious and somebody NEEDS to go

Wisse wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Wisse wrote:can we stop with the random.org votes, those are stupid...

btw i fos everyone

They are not stupid they're better then No lynch, and how do you start a day without suspicious, we need random.org votes.

well yeah they better than no lynch, so you say the chance of 2-4/23 to lynch a mafia is better than no lynch? then we lynch nearly always a townie
8,7-17,4% that we lynch a mafia...

i Vote: Fircoal

It's a vote that you make suspicion. You don't keep the vote on for the whole game.

how do you mean? the day is not over yet you know? i can always unvote you, i don't understand what you just did say

Sorry, what I mean is that a random vote isn't going to stay for the whole game. So those lynch percents really will not come into the equation.

and random.org told me to vote you

P Gizzle wrote:and random.org told me to vote you

Are you mocking me, or did it really tell you to.

it told me to....i don't mock people...i try to be as nice to people as possible, i COULD mock you if u want me to

Mock him!

P Gizzle wrote:it told me to....i don't mock people...i try to be as nice to people as possible, i COULD mock you if u want me to

No I don't want you to.