Conquer Club

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 6:42 am**

needs updating! gibbom 3826 in 80 games.

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 6:43 am**

I dont think that battle royale points are counted... :roll:

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 6:54 am**

because?

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 6:59 am**

Are doubles and triples points won against deadbeats or clueless n00bs counted?

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 7:05 am**

Genghis Khan CA wrote:Are doubles and triples points won against deadbeats or clueless n00bs counted?

exactly. i think points are points, no disrespect to anyone, but they are arent they?

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 7:08 am**

alex_white101 wrote:
Genghis Khan CA wrote:Are doubles and triples points won against deadbeats or clueless n00bs counted?

exactly

Yes, as well as against generals, colonels, etc., etc....

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 7:23 am**

Game 143470

2007-05-20 11:02:54 - gibbom gains 2252 points

Break out the record books!!! lol

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 7:35 am**

Thanks for the attention guys - I know I'm a long way from proving myself to be the no 1 player on the site just cos I won one massive game. But if I'm still up there in another 100 games or so, who knows? Don't think it'll happen though to be honest...

Posted: **Sun May 20, 2007 8:11 am**

gibbom,

As an old fogie here, I appreciate your humility. Even more importantly, you sound like a nice guy! Welcome to the top!

...but beware - you've just become a marked man!!!

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 10:10 am**

Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
THE TOP 10 HIGHEST SCORES ALL-TIME
"since the beginning of time"
(updated May 27th, 2007)

1. Blitzaholic 4386
2. Gibbom 3826*
3. Jork 3471
4. Jonnyrocket 3414
5. Eye84free 3412

6. Maniacmath 3406
7. yosevuk 3398
8. Belzbub 3384
9. Stronger 3368
10. osujacket 3231

[/color]

And for fun...
Here's the high water marks for all others who have made general...
"in all of recorded history"

11. Steelplayin 3222
12. dugcarr1 3174 *banned for being a griefer*
13. pheared 3169
14. rl_orange 3168
15. scorba 3167

16. Nuke 3160
17. eddymush 3150
18. Lazaruslong 3147
19. Cyberdaniel 3145
20. Theblackrose 3114

21. Subjekt 3114
22. Andrewb 3107
23. Juventino 3079
24. Pilate 3055
25. Alstergren 3048

26. marviddin 3033
27. Robinette 3021
28. dminus 3002 *multi*

Held the # 1 Spot while being over 3K in points the longest in CC History since it's Inception: Only 10 Ever to do it!

1. Blitzaholic 170 days
2. Pilate 39 days
3. Belzbub 17 days
4. Alstergren 14 days
5. Jork 10 days
6. Gibbom* 4 days
7. Eye84free 3 days
8. Maniacmath 1 day
9. Yosevuk few hours
10. Johnnyrocket few hours

[b]CC RECORD: BLITZAHOLIC maintained GENERAL RANK for 1,045 str8 GAMES

updated

note: *received over 2,200 points in one game (battle royal)*

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 10:11 am**

congratz gibbom

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 10:35 am**

I think it's Gibbom <- with an m... not like the monkey esque animal...

(Yes I know Gibbons aren't monkeys)

C.

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 11:05 am**

Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
THE TOP 10 HIGHEST SCORES ALL-TIME
"since the beginning of time"
(updated May 21st, 2007)

1. Blitzaholic** 4386
2. Gibbon 3826*
3. Jork 3425
4. Jonnyrocket 3414
5. Eye84free 3412

6. Maniacmath 3406
7. Belzbub 3384
8. Stronger 3368
9. yosevuk 3357
10. osujacket 3231

[/color]

And for fun...
Here's the high water marks for all others who have made general...
"in all of recorded history"

11. Steelplayin 3222
12. dugcarr1 3174 *banned for being a griefer*
13. pheared 3169
14. rl_orange 3168
15. scorba 3167

16. Nuke
17. eddymush 3150
18. Lazaruslong 3147
19. Cyberdaniel 3145
20. Theblackrose 3114

21. Subjekt 3114
22. Andrewb 3107
23. Juventino 3079
24. Pilate 3055
25. Alstergren 3048

26. marviddin 3033
27. Robinette 3021
28. dminus 3002 *multi*

Held the # 1 Spot while being over 3K in points the longest in CC History since it's Inception: Only 10 Ever to do it!

1. Blitzaholic 170 days
2. Pilate 39 days
3. Belzbub 17 days
4. Alstergren 14 days
5. Jork 10 days
6. Eye84free 3 days
7. Maniacmath 1 day
8. Yosevuk few hours
9. Johnnyrocket few hours
10.Gibbon* few hours

[b]CC RECORD: BLITZAHOLIC maintained GENERAL RANK for 1,045 str8 GAMES

Blitzaholic 73.3 Winning Percentage-CC Record-Minimum 500 games

updated

note: *received over 2,200 points in one game (battle royal)*
note: *recieved over ****** points playing doubles and triples with noobs

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 4:13 pm**

podge wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
THE TOP 10 HIGHEST SCORES ALL-TIME
"since the beginning of time"
(updated May 21st, 2007)

1. Blitzaholic** 4386
2. Gibbon 3826*
3. Jork 3425
4. Jonnyrocket 3414
5. Eye84free 3412

6. Maniacmath 3406
7. Belzbub 3384
8. Stronger 3368
9. yosevuk 3357
10. osujacket 3231

[/color]

And for fun...
Here's the high water marks for all others who have made general...
"in all of recorded history"

11. Steelplayin 3222
12. dugcarr1 3174 *banned for being a griefer*
13. pheared 3169
14. rl_orange 3168
15. scorba 3167

16. Nuke
17. eddymush 3150
18. Lazaruslong 3147
19. Cyberdaniel 3145
20. Theblackrose 3114

21. Subjekt 3114
22. Andrewb 3107
23. Juventino 3079
24. Pilate 3055
25. Alstergren 3048

26. marviddin 3033
27. Robinette 3021
28. dminus 3002 *multi*

Held the # 1 Spot while being over 3K in points the longest in CC History since it's Inception: Only 10 Ever to do it!

1. Blitzaholic 170 days
2. Pilate 39 days
3. Belzbub 17 days
4. Alstergren 14 days
5. Jork 10 days
6. Eye84free 3 days
7. Maniacmath 1 day
8. Yosevuk few hours
9. Johnnyrocket few hours
10.Gibbon* few hours

[b]CC RECORD: BLITZAHOLIC maintained GENERAL RANK for 1,045 str8 GAMES

Blitzaholic 73.3 Winning Percentage-CC Record-Minimum 500 games

updated

note: *received over 2,200 points in one game (battle royal)*
note: *recieved over ****** points playing doubles and triples with noobs

please clearify you description of a "noob".

The funny thing is, everyone thinks a general should just play generals or they are accused of running up their scores. I start games and place them in the public games section for anyone to join. If you take a look you will see there are 17,000 active players. Personally, I believe anything under 2,500 points is weak. So the odds of generals joining the games before lower ranked players is going to be very slim. So im never going to play strong players unless I notify generals I am starting some games up. If im going to do that, than I should probably just waste my time and set up private games with passwords and sit there and waste my time waiting for players to read my message and join the game. I also play up to 200 games at a time. There will never be enough players over 2,500 points to join and play that many games with me. It also works both ways. If you would look, you will see a ton of players under 2,500 points on my team as well. When I see stupid responses like the previous post, you make it sound like Johnnyrocket, Jork, and Blitz only play together and against players of low rank. When In fact, that represents under 5% of my games.

for once I would like 1 person to do some research before they post something stupid without checking.

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 5:05 pm**

my post was a snipe at you for trying to draw attention to gibbon's place on the leaderboard with *

Why would you do that ???

I don't see an asterisk beside anybody elses name or score

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 5:13 pm**

Yet again I'm lured into a thread under false pretences, here's me expecting a nice unbiasedstatistical thread to run alongside our nice but limited scoreboard .

Only to find its really only about some people trying to inflate there own worth and ego and try and dispute others achievements. You know who you are.

My suggestion is to re-name this thread something like....

read this so you can see how much I think I'm better than you all and if you try and dispute my ideas I'll just add more things that make me look better than you in my eyes

[/sarcasm]

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 5:18 pm**

panicker wrote:Yet again I'm lured into a thread under false pretences, here's me expecting a nice unbiasedstatistical thread to run alongside our nice but limited scoreboard .

Only to find its really only about some people trying to inflate there own worth and ego and try and dispute others achievements. You know who you are.

My suggestion is to re-name this thread something like....

read this so you can see how much I think I'm better than you all and if you try and dispute my ideas I'll just add more things that make me look better than you in my eyes

[/sarcasm]

i was thinking more in the line of a title

i can never be at the top so i will bitch about the players that are. i will try and prove they suck by coming up with bullshit scenerios to make them look bad even though they done nothing wrong except win which for some unknown noobish reason i cant manage to do.

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 5:24 pm**

podge wrote:my post was a snipe at you for trying to draw attention to gibbon's place on the leaderboard with *

Why would you do that ???

I don't see an asterisk beside anybody elses name or score

any response here ??

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 5:43 pm**

podge wrote:
podge wrote:my post was a snipe at you for trying to draw attention to gibbon's place on the leaderboard with *

Why would you do that ???

I don't see an asterisk beside anybody elses name or score

any response here ??

So no answer then ?

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 6:08 pm**

podge wrote:
podge wrote:
podge wrote:my post was a snipe at you for trying to draw attention to gibbon's place on the leaderboard with *

Why would you do that ???

I don't see an asterisk beside anybody elses name or score

any response here ??

So no answer then ?

Well... Someone who wouldn't know about the battle royale could be wondering who gibbom is, and how he got so many points. I think an asterix besides his name is appropriate. I'm sure he wouldn't mind.

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 6:20 pm**

Thanks for having the decency to reply Poo but I think that was the furthest thing from JR's mind when he put that little * there.

Unless he say otherwise

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 8:21 pm**

I dint put the asterix there dumbass. Look at the 1st post to this thread which I created moron...... no asterix

Again, look before you respond. All you noobs are alike. Fast with the keyboard but nothing to back it up with.

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 8:24 pm**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I dint put the asterix there dumbass. Look at the 1st post to this thread which I created moron...... no asterix

Again, look before you respond. All you noobs are alike. Fast with the keyboard but nothing to back it up with.

podge
Score: 1874
Rank: major
games completed: 710

While not exactly JohnnyRocket level, I wouldn't call podge a noob either

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 8:38 pm**

AAFitz wrote:Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

wow, AA can predict the future. :shock:

Posted: **Mon May 21, 2007 10:23 pm**

Fircoal wrote:
AAFitz wrote:Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

wow, AA can predict the future.

Robinettes was his practice run...man this is over the top...dont remember being quite that opinionated in it...

for the record...I like AK...hes a good player, works hard in the tourneys, helps players out, and has some funny posts....its the arbitrary deletion that got my attention here...just doesnt seem like its worth the space to annoy people by deleting a thread...theres 50 pages of them in every topic...surely half of each could go...threads die when theres no interest...I just think its the best way...but I could be wrong

Conquer Club

CC'S ALL TIME TOP 100 SCORES

CC'S ALL-TIME TOP SCORES and Records

Re: CC'S ALL-TIME TOP SCORES and Records

Re: CC'S ALL-TIME TOP SCORES and Records