Page 30 of 89
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:44 am
by Wisse
the lightes gray shades are better than the darker bit try to make them more transparant
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:23 pm
by bedplay
i like the 2nd 1. and I think the army shadows in 2nd 1 look fine and are the best.
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:00 pm
by Qwert
ok litle transparent gray circle, i will do work these tomorow.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:04 am
by Qwert
here a final version of eastern front map i think that all good.

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:07 am
by sam_levi_11
looks absolutley amazing-will definatley play
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:28 am
by Wisse
looks much better

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:13 am
by qeee1
Looks good to go.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:39 am
by Marvaddin
I would like having the names in the legend centralized. Im sure this is an easy thing to do
Plus, the legend could be moved up a bit, once the title was moved. And there is an ugly much lighter region in Russian non-playable lands over legends and title, too.
Beyond that, no complaints

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:51 am
by boberz
they are centralised are they not do u mean to right/left align them in which case keep them as they are correct me if i misunderstood
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:16 pm
by Wisse
Marvaddin wrote:I would like having the names in the legend centralized. Im sure this is an easy thing to do
Plus, the legend could be moved up a bit, once the title was moved. And there is an ugly much lighter region in Russian non-playable lands over legends and title, too.
Beyond that, no complaints

they are centralized
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:53 pm
by Qwert
Maybe look that not centralised but names have diferent numbers of letters and can not be equal, and she centralised good.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:06 pm
by AndyDufresne
Well the army coordinates are certainly looking better!
I think marv would like to see each name, centralized in it's own box. As you can see, Hold All Stars is more to the right than the left, and most of the others are also to the right.
I'd also like to see perhaps, a simple black font in the legend, rather than with the white shadow, as it sometimes clashes, especially in Leeb and Bock boxes.
--Andy
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:17 pm
by Qwert
ok maybe i crazy but, do you andy from begining folow my work in map you will se that in begining bonus box change names, color and shadows, and several times you tell me to"And now can we se map with these and these" and i put maps and after 5 day you again tell me"And now can we se map with these and these".
If you want to agree you dont folow my creation of map decent.
These look to me like Monty Pyton Flying Circus"And now something complete diferent, a men with tape record in hes nouse"

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:46 pm
by Ruben Cassar
Well I don't know how much my opinion counts, but in my book this map is ready for quenching. Looking forward to play on it. I think you did a great job Qwert...both in terms of playability and visual appeal.
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:05 pm
by Qwert
well i dont have these luck, i will tomorow present small and large map together.

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:50 am
by Qwert
Like i say here finish maps.
small
large

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:09 am
by boberz
yay its good. Cani personally thank qwert for managing to keep concerntration this has been one of the most up-and-down maps in terms of mood and general discussion but i think that qwert has kept his determination and now it is 50 pages and a brilliant map
thank you qwert
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:35 am
by Wisse
AndyDufresne wrote:I'd also like to see perhaps, a simple black font in the legend, rather than with the white shadow, as it sometimes clashes, especially in Leeb and Bock boxes.
--Andy
agreed
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:47 am
by Qwert
Ok you comment what andy wrote, and agree, but i down write explain and you dont agree?
qwert wrote
ok maybe i crazy but, do you andy from begining folow my work in map you will se that in begining bonus box change names, color and shadows, and several times you tell me to"And now can we se map with these and these" and i put maps and after 5 day you again tell me"And now can we se map with these and these".
If you want to agree you dont folow my creation of map decent.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:49 am
by Wisse
qwert wrote:Ok you comment what andy wrote, and agree, but i down write explain and you dont agree?
qwert wrote
ok maybe i crazy but, do you andy from begining folow my work in map you will se that in begining bonus box change names, color and shadows, and several times you tell me to"And now can we se map with these and these" and i put maps and after 5 day you again tell me"And now can we se map with these and these".
If you want to agree you dont folow my creation of map decent.
he did just say to remove the shadow after the names...
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:52 pm
by AndyDufresne
Qwert, I follow all map creations, but I'm not here to hold your hand through the process. Sometimes the Foundry suggests most of the things I'd suggest, so I don't comment. When the Foundry is flowing nicely and working hard, and doing their jobs, I'm not needed to be there with my guiding hand, which I like.
--Andy
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:02 pm
by Qwert
So if you follow all map creations, and you know that Bonus Box names change your names,colors and shadows( in a begining names have simple black color).And i dont understand why you ask from me to put again to show names without shadows, its some kind of joke?

Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:07 pm
by AndyDufresne
Cartography involves a lot of experimentation, qwert. You surely won't, and can't, get everything right on the first time or even second and third! Somethings pop out at different times, when I view the map.
Would you rather no change it? I honestly think it'd make the map look better, and cleaner. Are you looking to make no more changes?
--Andy
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:35 pm
by Ruben Cassar
I think what Qwert means is that he had already made that change but it proved unpopular and he had to change it in the past, so he doesn't see why he has to implement it again now.
It's easy for the other people to say change this and change that but they don't realise all the work that the map makers are putting behind the new maps. Hundreds of hours of hard work which I fear some might not appreciate enough at times.
I personally think too much time is being wasted with trivial things in this map, and that it's ready to go....but that's my opinion after all.
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:38 pm
by KEYOGI
I said I wouldn't post again in this thread, so I apologise. I guarantee this will be the last. qwert, you said the following to me in a PM:
qwert wrote:well i will finish map like now and if many people have complain of something, you must understand that 3 or 4 people not good inaf to change, and i want to large part of players be involve to my create.
To me, you still need to clean up Leningrad Army borders so you can give some territories more room for their army shadows. How many people do you need to make a suggestion before you will change it?
I'd also appreciate it if you stopped making personal attacks against me in other peoples map threads.