Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 12:20 pm
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Page 2691 of 2710
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 2:33 pm
A good point.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2023 8:01 pm
Auto gets +1 +2 for being on his "game."
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2023 7:53 am
it’s the same two dumb ass ugly girls over and over.
How is this (porn loading) being “on your game”.
If you wanna post tits at the top of each page find some new shit.
How is this (porn loading) being “on your game”.
If you wanna post tits at the top of each page find some new shit.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2023 8:10 am
1) I did not post THOSE 2 photos.jimboston wrote:it’s the same two dumb ass ugly girls over and over.
How is this (porn loading) being “on your game”.
If you wanna post tits at the top of each page find some new shit.
2) You MISSED The Point, again, jimb. You just don;t [sic] get it, do you?
3) Get a life and you won't be such a GRUMPY OLD MAN, jimb.
4) When I post images of beautiful women, you complain, so why try to please The GRUMPY OLD MAN, jimb?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2023 8:48 pm
Agreed.jimboston wrote:it’s the same two dumb ass ugly girls over and over.
Timing his posts to get those girls at the top of the page is exactly the game. So, every time he succeeds, he scores a point. So, by the very definition of what a game is, he is on it.jimboston wrote:How is this (porn loading) being “on your game”.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2023 10:54 pm
I get a sick satisfaction on posting the same two ugly girls. Post a new ugly girl at the top of a page and I will poach it for future pages.
hisssssssssssss
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2023 11:38 pm
KA-BOOM!
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:37 am
I do not recall jimb posting any pictures, and I have not seen a picture of a girl (or woman) ugly, pretty, beautiful, or average posted by jimb.autoload wrote:I get a sick satisfaction on posting the same two ugly girls. Post a new ugly girl at the top of a page and I will poach it for future pages.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 1:56 pm
Hi, friends.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 9:45 pm
welcome! Long time no see.UCAbears wrote:Hi, friends.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 11:57 am
I don’t post porno or semi-porno pictures of women on internet forums without their approval.jusplay4fun wrote:I do not recall jimb posting any pictures, and I have not seen a picture of a girl (or woman) ugly, pretty, beautiful, or average posted by jimb.autoload wrote:I get a sick satisfaction on posting the same two ugly girls. Post a new ugly girl at the top of a page and I will poach it for future pages.
You likely have no clue about the provenance of the pictures you repost.
Just cause some other ass posted or shared pics on some random site without permission doesn’t mean you should perpetuate that.
My exception for picture posting of women is generally public figures / celebrities and pictures that were taken in public and/or captured from motion pictures of TV… as these are obviously by definition either “approved” by the woman depicted, or taken in public.
Random shots lf random women flashing their tits… maybe they were private pics that were leaked by assholes.
You shouldn’t repost.
If you do you have no class.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 4:34 pm
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:57 am
jimboston wrote:I don’t post porno or semi-porno pictures of women on internet forums without their approval.jusplay4fun wrote:I do not recall jimb posting any pictures, and I have not seen a picture of a girl (or woman) ugly, pretty, beautiful, or average posted by jimb.autoload wrote:I get a sick satisfaction on posting the same two ugly girls. Post a new ugly girl at the top of a page and I will poach it for future pages.
You likely have no clue about the provenance of the pictures you repost.
Just cause some other ass posted or shared pics on some random site without permission doesn’t mean you should perpetuate that.
My exception for picture posting of women is generally public figures / celebrities and pictures that were taken in public and/or captured from motion pictures of TV… as these are obviously by definition either “approved” by the woman depicted, or taken in public.
Random shots lf random women flashing their tits… maybe they were private pics that were leaked by assholes.
You shouldn’t repost.
If you do you have no class.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 7:30 am
She was homeschooled.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 8:36 am
The golfer is a public figure/model/athlete.. and that is clearly a professionally taken photo designed for promotional purposes.
So reposting that isn’t low-brow cheap in the same way that say reposting some amateur rando’s photo without permission would be.
That said, I don’t see how posting that photo with no context adds any value to this forum.
It’s just eye candy / borderline entry-level porn.
No context… no discussion about professional athletes, Insta-Snap models, or the sexualization of society.
So yeah… it’s not low-brow but it adds no value. If anyone wants to look at borderline porn there are plenty of better websites for that.
But keep posting as you think it somehow proves your manliness, and somehow my NOT posting proves something else?
So reposting that isn’t low-brow cheap in the same way that say reposting some amateur rando’s photo without permission would be.
That said, I don’t see how posting that photo with no context adds any value to this forum.
It’s just eye candy / borderline entry-level porn.
No context… no discussion about professional athletes, Insta-Snap models, or the sexualization of society.
So yeah… it’s not low-brow but it adds no value. If anyone wants to look at borderline porn there are plenty of better websites for that.
But keep posting as you think it somehow proves your manliness, and somehow my NOT posting proves something else?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:48 am
NOT posting?
When did either of you do that?
jusplay4fun wrote:
When did either of you do that?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 12:11 pm
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 12:16 pm
Not posting questionable and random pics of random girls in various states of undress.2dimes wrote:NOT posting?
When did either of you do that?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 5:02 pm
You MISSED The Point, again, jimb. You just don;t [sic] get it, do you?
What is the (current) game here? Post one of those 2 pics (images) at the Top of the Page by Auto.
Why do it? For the FUN and game of it.
I then POST a legitimate post according to YOUR Rules and you still complain. You;re [sic] still a Grumpy Old Man, jimb.
What is the (current) game here? Post one of those 2 pics (images) at the Top of the Page by Auto.
Why do it? For the FUN and game of it.
I then POST a legitimate post according to YOUR Rules and you still complain. You;re [sic] still a Grumpy Old Man, jimb.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 7:45 pm
I guess if you think violating the privacy of some random girl on the internet is “a game”…jusplay4fun wrote:You MISSED The Point, again, jimb. You just don;t [sic] get it, do you?
What is the (current) game here? Post one of those 2 pics (images) at the Top of the Page by Auto.
Why do it? For the FUN and game of it.
I then POST a legitimate post according to YOUR Rules and you still complain. You;re [sic] still a Grumpy Old Man, jimb.
I personally don’t think that.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:32 pm
Well, we have difference of opinion, it seems. SURPRISE..!jimboston wrote:I guess if you think violating the privacy of some random girl on the internet is “a game”…jusplay4fun wrote:You MISSED The Point, again, jimb. You just don;t [sic] get it, do you?
What is the (current) game here? Post one of those 2 pics (images) at the Top of the Page by Auto.
Why do it? For the FUN and game of it.
I then POST a legitimate post according to YOUR Rules and you still complain. You;re [sic] still a Grumpy Old Man, jimb.
I personally don’t think that.
And anyone who posts a photo online or in any social media surrender part of their privacy. If these persons WANT privacy, they would simply not post or send a picture to ANYONE. PERIOD. It is like Prince Harry and Meghan wanting "privacy" but go on TV all the time looking for attention. Do you THINK those 2 women TRIED to hide their bodies? Were the caught unaware when the photo was taken?
Again, I do not post the picture of those two women; for some of us, it is simply a game. If you want to make it a matter of GREAT significance of privacy, so be it.
Your choice, you curmudgeon, jimb. AND, you continue to NOT admit when you are wrong, as you did AGAIN recently about the possessive regarding birthdays.
above is jimb yelling to the kids in his neighborhood to "Get OFF my Lawn..!.."
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 7:06 am
jusplay4fun wrote:Well, we have difference of opinion, it seems. SURPRISE..!jimboston wrote: I guess if you think violating the privacy of some random girl on the internet is “a game”…
I personally don’t think that.
You have no clue or knowledge of the provenance of these pictures.
Yes very likely they were posted on social media. It’s possible some are professional models. You don’t KNOW.
(Obviously doesn’t apply to the know professional models/actresses/athletes posted here.)
I believe that posting pictures of girls of dubious age, in various states of undress, just to give yourself a little thrill is…
LOW CLASS
You are free to disagree.
You may be in the right legally… but that’s not clear if the girls are minors and in some cases/states it’s illegal to post stolen photos.
So a young lady who makes a bad decision at 22yo should be subjected to your violations into perpetuity? OK -> LOW ClASSjusplay4fun wrote:
And anyone who posts a photo online or in any social media surrender part of their privacy. If these persons WANT privacy, they would simply not post or send a picture to ANYONE. PERIOD.
Also… your don’t know these were posted on social media. Maybe they were privately sent to a boyfriend?
Maybe they were on their personal computer and were hacked, or the computer went in for service and the tech grabbed them?
YOU DON’T KNOW.
I’m sure if they were your daughter, niece, etc. you’d feel she deserved some respect.
Naw… nothing like that. They are obviously out there and public figures. You have no clue who these young ladies are.jusplay4fun wrote:
It is like Prince Harry and Meghan wanting "privacy" but go on TV all the time looking for attention.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 7:39 am
Quirk wrote:
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:42 am
The "white girl" is from Tumblr. I do not see any such reference for the Oriental girl.
If we do not know her name or where she lives, does that subject her to shame the REST of her life? NO, not likely. by ONE of US? NO, very unlikely. What are the ODDS that one the FEW of us on CC (or our acquaintances, up to what, the 6th degree?) knows her?
jimb makes ANOTHER weak argument. He claims a violation of PRIVACY. I doubt either of those two young women were seeking "Privacy" when they posted or shared their photo. I would argue further that both likely enjoy most attention they would get. NOT attention from weirdo, creepy, and/or stalking types, but an appreciation of their good feminine looks.
and, jimb says:
I challenge you, jimb: Find and post a BETTER one. And USE YOUR same standard and see if you can get that at the top of the next page. THAT would be your ONE achievement here on CC.
If we do not know her name or where she lives, does that subject her to shame the REST of her life? NO, not likely. by ONE of US? NO, very unlikely. What are the ODDS that one the FEW of us on CC (or our acquaintances, up to what, the 6th degree?) knows her?
jimb makes ANOTHER weak argument. He claims a violation of PRIVACY. I doubt either of those two young women were seeking "Privacy" when they posted or shared their photo. I would argue further that both likely enjoy most attention they would get. NOT attention from weirdo, creepy, and/or stalking types, but an appreciation of their good feminine looks.
and, jimb says:
I do not repost those photos. You are talking the wrong person, jimb.You shouldn’t repost.
If you do you have no class.
I challenge you, jimb: Find and post a BETTER one. And USE YOUR same standard and see if you can get that at the top of the next page. THAT would be your ONE achievement here on CC.