Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 8:29 pm
by targetman377
tardis?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 8:37 pm
by notyou2
reply 64,001
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 9:21 pm
by Quirk
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 11:06 am
by AndyDufresne
Bananas and food, water, and medical aid to Nepal.
**Leaves behind and infinite bowl of bananas**
--Andy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:50 pm
by targetman377
wow andy's getting political in this thread
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 10:38 pm
by AndyDufresne
targetman377 wrote:wow andy's getting political in this thread
I'm also going to leave this behind.
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:17 pm
by targetman377
AndyDufresne wrote:
targetman377 wrote:wow andy's getting political in this thread
I'm also going to leave this behind.
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
wtf andy i am seriously concerned for your well being.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 12:58 pm
by DoomYoshi
This following article is something I have been trying to say for a while:
> This week, there have been stories about farmers who can’t legally repair > their John Deere tractors, as copyright monopoly legislation prohibits > tampering with computer code in something you own. This has been > described as an “unexpected side effect” of the copyright monopoly > legislation in general and the DMCA/EUCD in particular. > > That’s wrong. It’s not a side effect and it’s not unexpected. That is > exactly what those laws intended to accomplish. Being locked out of your > own possessions is not a side effect – it was the central point of the > legislation and its core purpose. > > As usual, the geeks who understood the deeper repercussions of this cried > murder over the legislation at the time, and were summarily ignored by > policymakers. Perhaps only now, when it becomes clear that it’s not just > geek toys that are affected but everything in our everyday life, will > more people become aware of how the copyright monopoly limits property > rights. > > This development, eroding property rights of everything, has been driven > by the cartoon industry – by which I mean the copyright industry in > general and Disney Corporation in particular. > > It started with DRM, Digital Restriction Measures. Somebody thought it > was both possible and a good idea to control how playback of video and > audio could take place at people’s homes after they bought music and > movies. (Imagine that translated to books, by the way, that publishers > thought it possible to control how a book would be read – where, when and > how.) > > Digital Restriction Measures (DRM) were never about preventing copying, > even though they were frequently presented as “copy protection”, mostly > for PR purposes. They did absolutely nothing to prevent copying. They > prevented playback. They controlled playback. They permitted or didn’t > permit playback. > > However, the technology didn’t work. The technology couldn’t work. It > wasn’t broken at the technical level, or needed a little bit of > improvement: it was broken at the conceptual level. It relied on the > cartoon industry’s ability to prevent the owner of an object to tinker > with their own property. (This is where tractors and cars come in.) > > Obviously, if a computer is able to decode and decrypt a cartoon, then > the owner of that computer is also able to instruct their own computer > computer to decode and decrypt it (presumably a copy they bought and > therefore also own), even against the cartoon industry’s desire for that > possibility. > > This is why DRM is broken at the conceptual level. > > In this respect, there is no difference between a copy of a car or > tractor – one of many identical sold objects off a production line – and > a CD or DVD. You hold the receipt, you own it. The manufacturer doesn’t > get to say what you do with your own property. > > Or didn’t, at least. > > The cartoon industry – copyright industry – realized that they needed to > attack the core concept of the ability to hold property in order to prop > up their crumbling copyright monopoly, and pushed for legislation that > turned out as something called the DMCA in the US and the EUCD/InfoSoc in > Europe. It “fixes” the conceptual problem with DRM by simply making it > illegal to tinker with your own property when the original manufacturer, > who sold the object to you, doesn’t want it tinkered with even after it’s > been sold to you. > > Yes, that’s a blatant intrusion into the very core concept of property > rights. It also illustrates how the copyright monopoly, a governmentally- > granted private monopoly, was always firmly in opposition to property > rights (despite the copyright industry’s insistent attempts to reframe it > as “property” for PR purposes, which is one of many lies from that > cartoon industry). > > As computers are spreading through society, into every aspect of our > lives, so are the effects of the law that the copyright industry rammed > through legislative corridors fifteen years ago. > > John Deere claiming that farmers aren’t allowed to tinker with their > tractors and other farming equipment is not an “unfortunate side effect” > of copyright monopoly legislation. It was the core idea, all the time, to > prevent owners of property to exercise their normal property rights. That > was the only possible way the copyright monopoly was even slightly > maintainable into a digital environment. > > One has to ask whether it was, and continue to be, worth that price. > > In any case, now that it’s not just geeks and nerds being affected by the > cartoon industry’s wholesale slaughter of civil liberties but car owners > and farmers and most ordinary people, one can hope that understanding of > the fundamental idiocy of these laws can start to surface a little wider.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 4:25 pm
by Quirk
BPotW
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 9:17 pm
by targetman377
So I was busy playing civ. all night with a friend. Gandhi no doubt has use nukes however lucky not on us. We are playing on one down from deity and we are just scraping by. However we seem to turn a corner in the game and have a solid plan. the two top dogs right now are Assyrians and India they are nuking there way to defeating Sweden. The Zulus separate us from them. by the way I am super drunk.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:02 pm
by muy_thaiguy
targetman377 wrote:So I was busy playing civ. all night with a friend. Gandhi no doubt has use nukes however lucky not on us. We are playing on one down from deity and we are just scraping by. However we seem to turn a corner in the game and have a solid plan. the two top dogs right now are Assyrians and India they are nuking there way to defeating Sweden. The Zulus separate us from them. by the way I am super drunk.
We know. Otherwise half the words you put in your post would be misspelled.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 10:41 pm
by targetman377
muy_thaiguy wrote:
targetman377 wrote:So I was busy playing civ. all night with a friend. Gandhi no doubt has use nukes however lucky not on us. We are playing on one down from deity and we are just scraping by. However we seem to turn a corner in the game and have a solid plan. the two top dogs right now are Assyrians and India they are nuking there way to defeating Sweden. The Zulus separate us from them. by the way I am super drunk.
We know. Otherwise half the words you put in your post would be misspelled.
I know weird right? I often wonder why my spelling improves when I am drunk who knows... maybe its why most good authors are alcoholics.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:37 pm
by strike wolf
I here the words in my head and that is why I tend to misspell words like there, they're and their...On the other hand, my own voice in my head drown out the other voices.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:53 pm
by targetman377
so stike hears voices....
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 9:27 am
by AndyDufresne
targetman377 wrote:so stike hears voices....
Targetman has no ears. **Munches on a banana**
--Andy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 9:01 pm
by targetman377
that's cause I am an elephant!! we hear though our toes.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 9:06 pm
by Dukasaur
You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead - your next stop, the Twilight Zone!
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 9:26 pm
by muy_thaiguy
Dukasaur wrote:You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead - your next stop, the Twilight Zone!
Ah crap. Those horrendous books now have a "zone"? CRAP!
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 10:44 pm
by targetman377
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead - your next stop, the Twilight Zone!
Ah crap. Those horrendous books now have a "zone"? CRAP!
have you never seen the 60s version pure sci fyi gold
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 11:18 pm
by AndyDufresne
Mondays. **Munches on a banana**
--Andy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:06 am
by Quirk
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 3:39 pm
by diddle
Skittles! wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Skittles! wrote:I can't believe this damn thread is still going on.
It is one of the things on Conquer Club that isn't declining as fast as the rest.
**Munches on a banana**
--Andy
I am overall surprised this website still has the domain tbh.
diddle wrote:
Skittles! wrote:I can't believe this damn thread is still going on.
You're telling me...
are you still hot diddle or what
If anything I'm hotter Skittles...
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 4:40 pm
by blackdragon1661
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 6:35 am
by Quirk
BPotW
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 12:14 pm
by AndyDufresne
Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the Lord my soul to keep; if I die before I wake, I pray for Lord my soul to take. Amen
This is an audio cylinder from a Thomas Edison talking doll from the late 1800s, that looked like this one: