Page 25 of 31
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:31 am
by yeti_c
gimil wrote:you havent been misquoted, i copied and pasted verythinh
There is an errored quote tho...
C.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:40 am
by gimil
yeti_c wrote:gimil wrote:you havent been misquoted, i copied and pasted verythinh
There is an errored quote tho...
C.
stop there yeti . . .
back to your geek work
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:44 am
by yeti_c
gimil wrote:yeti_c wrote:gimil wrote:you havent been misquoted, i copied and pasted verythinh
There is an errored quote tho...
C.
stop there yeti . . .
back to your geek work
Pffft...
C.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:06 pm
by gimil
Its the big one coming
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:11 pm
by gimil
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:12 pm
by gimil
Please note that the reduced quality of the armie numbers is becasue i used paint to paste the images into
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:14 pm
by militant
Nice work gimil
It is looking great!
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:53 pm
by Snorri1234
It looks nice, but I have one issue. I have trouble seeing the kingdom borders. Especially on the small map.
Maybe touch up the colours of the different realms or at least the numbers for each territory in the realm?
Other than that it looks pretty frigging sweet.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:10 pm
by unriggable
What happened to classic?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:53 pm
by gimil
Snorri1234 wrote:It looks nice, but I have one issue. I have trouble seeing the kingdom borders. Especially on the small map.
Maybe touch up the colours of the different realms or at least the numbers for each territory in the realm?
Other than that it looks pretty frigging sweet.
are you looking at the right image? The ones WITH armie numbers are of a much lower quality makngi te boarders look blurry, they are much clearer on the image with NO armie numbers.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:53 pm
by gimil
unriggable wrote:What happened to classic?
conquest sounds better
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:07 pm
by Snorri1234
gimil wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:It looks nice, but I have one issue. I have trouble seeing the kingdom borders. Especially on the small map.
Maybe touch up the colours of the different realms or at least the numbers for each territory in the realm?
Other than that it looks pretty frigging sweet.
are you looking at the right image? The ones WITH armie numbers are of a much lower quality makngi te boarders look blurry, they are much clearer on the image with NO armie numbers.
Yeah I'm talking about even teh ones without army numbers. The small map has Rhu and Fol their numbers looking their number hard to discern. I can only imagine that it would be more annoying if there were actual armies on it.
It's not immposible to see, but I think making it more easier to see would be a big help.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:47 pm
by gimil
I can do a little work on teh terr names, and ill redraw the borders in te morning.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:29 am
by gimil
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:32 am
by tim02
this is so much like AoR
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:37 am
by bryguy
wow, looked at it once when i think it was in map foundry, then left for awhile
looks AWESOME!!!!! and i agree with tim, it does look alot like AoR, but i like that type of map
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:38 am
by rebelman
tim02 wrote:this is so much like AoR
this is the original, AoR is like this
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:40 am
by bryguy
rebelman wrote:tim02 wrote:this is so much like AoR
this is the original, AoR is like this
oh true, this map was started what... 3 months ago?? AoR took less than 3 months to get made as far as i know, and even less for AoR Magic
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:51 am
by gimil
bryguy wrote:rebelman wrote:tim02 wrote:this is so much like AoR
this is the original, AoR is like this
oh true, this map was started what... 3 months ago?? AoR took less than 3 months to get made as far as i know, and even less for AoR Magic
doesnt matter how much time was spent on it, If you look in the earlydrafts of AoM youll see its titles feudal war . . .
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:04 pm
by edbeard
have the amount of neutrals on the territories been discussed? I would think/hope so. If so, could you direct me to the page this is located. Thanks.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:07 pm
by gimil
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:13 pm
by edbeard
could you repost it on this page? especially with the change you told me about in your PM. It still looks/feels like if you start out in the north you are at a disadvantage.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:16 pm
by gimil
Ill do it first thing in the morning for you edbeard
its bed time and i have an early start in the morning.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:18 pm
by edbeard
no worries. I just think this is the only thing left to discuss.
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:24 pm
by gimil
edbeard wrote:no worries. I just think this is the only thing left to discuss.
well if you want to leave your 2cent on what they should be i will read it will glee in the morning
