WWII Operation Iwo Jima [Quenched]

steve monkey · Post by **steve monkey** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:20 pm

one further spelling mistake "comand" should be command
Really like the way this is progressing.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:36 pm

o nooooo,not again ](*,)

(well you right i fix these tomorow)
Do i have some other speling mistake?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:56 pm

Plan B should be bonus 2, and find a way to fix the Plan A and Plan B being held together with only 2 countries to defend from.

edbeard · Post by **edbeard** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:59 pm

unriggable wrote:Plan B should be bonus 2, and find a way to fix the Plan A and Plan B being held together with only 2 countries to defend from.

well you can also have a bonus of 10 only protecting 4 territories.

I'm not sure if this is good or bad. I think it might be fine because these are the 'easy' to hold areas, so getting these places will be a priority for everyone.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:30 am

unriggable

Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Posts: 4082
Location: Anywhere and Everywhere
Posted: 07 Aug 2007 22:56 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan B should be bonus 2, and find a way to fix the Plan A and Plan B being held together with only 2 countries to defend from.

Well you late,i have these discusion far before(Look page 1-bonus poll and option)

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:08 am

Plan B should be bonus 2, and find a way to fix the Plan A and Plan B being held together with only 2 countries to defend from

So what problem with these?You have 4 same border defence country-4TH,5TH,Plan A and Plan B,and what problem with these?

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:09 am

Well i hope that all speling problem is solve.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:38 am

can you make the black margin transparent? it would look much be better.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:18 am

can you make the black margin transparent? it would look much be better.

_________________
Dont understand what will be beter if i put transparent?

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:37 am

qwert wrote:
can you make the black margin transparent? it would look much be better.

_________________
Dont understand what will be beter if i put transparent?

if the black is gone when you look at the map you see just the map on the screen without the nasty looking black. at least try it. it will be better.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:51 am

Well these only yours opinion,but i will try to remove and people can say what version is best.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:44 pm

Its these ok Dim.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:48 pm

qwert wrote:Its these ok Dim.

it looks perfect. i love it.

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:14 am

The only thing that I don't like is the font. It looks too modern for such an old map.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:30 am

Ruben Cassar

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 1244
Location: Civitas Invicta, Melita, Evropa
Posted: 10 Aug 2007 09:14 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The only thing that I don't like is the font. It looks too modern for such an old map.
_________________

To modern?How many time i must show original map of these operation?
These font is same from mine source for these map,and if you say that these is modern, then these mean that americans whas modern in year 1945.

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:52 am

Ruben Cassar wrote:The only thing that I don't like is the font. It looks too modern for such an old map.

America has always been a bit industrial, and as new age as we'd like to pretend to be a lot of things still look the same today they did back then. I guess it's about perspective. Anyway, it isn't too modern, it's as qwert already said, about the same as the original.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:39 pm

It's looking good qwert. I'd maybe consider making the infantry barrier 'x's a little less perfect and symmetrical, or at least less like 'type x's '...like on a keyboard or on a typewriter.

Also maybe fade your signature, make it transparent with the map, so it doesn't stick out so much and blends with the map. But since it's your signature, you can surely keep it whatever way you'd like.

I just like signatures that don't immediately get caught by my eye.

--Andy

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:43 pm

AndyDufresne

It's looking good qwert. I'd maybe consider making the infantry barrier 'x's a little less perfect and symmetrical, or at least less like 'type x's '...like on a keyboard or on a typewriter.

Also maybe fade your signature, make it transparent with the map, so it doesn't stick out so much and blends with the map. But since it's your signature, you can surely keep it whatever way you'd like. I just like signatures that don't immediately get caught by my eye.

--Andy

Like you notice,these is a strategic military map,and these is not a some perfect and summetrical X,its just simple symbol who present barrier on map."All in page 1"you can se that i present 4 diferent barrier symbols and people vote for these symbol,who is very simple,but very good present barriers in these map.

I want to all mine signature be same in all map,i hope that you agree with these(These is a flag of mine country,and i hope that lack will find these flag and change in mine profile old flag)

mibi · Post by **mibi** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:02 am

if this is a military map why are you using a comic sans type font. maybe a more military oriented font would give the map a more accurate military feel.

KEYOGI · Post by **KEYOGI** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:14 am

The font is actually pretty close to the original military font.

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/iwo_jima_2003.jpg

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 9:08 am

mibi

if this is a military map why are you using a comic sans type font. maybe a more military oriented font would give the map a more accurate military feel.

KEYOGI

Cartography Assistant

The font is actually pretty close to the original military font.

Keyogi is right,i will be 100% accurate if i know what font Americans use in hes map 1944 years.But i think that i very close to these military font(maybe 95-98% close).

mibi · Post by **mibi** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:51 pm

KEYOGI wrote:The font is actually pretty close to the original military font.

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/iwo_jima_2003.jpg

well isn't that wacky

Coleman · Post by **Coleman** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:17 pm

So what's going on with this?

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:27 pm

Nothing,waith to Andy tell me to show small and large image +XML code.

MarVal · Post by **MarVal** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:14 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:It's looking good qwert. I'd maybe consider making the infantry barrier 'x's a little less perfect and symmetrical, or at least less like 'type x's '...like on a keyboard or on a typewriter.

Also maybe fade your signature, make it transparent with the map, so it doesn't stick out so much and blends with the map. But since it's your signature, you can surely keep it whatever way you'd like. I just like signatures that don't immediately get caught by my eye.

--Andy

About your signature. Andy is right. It is not in the style of the map. You can fade it like the background of the map. Its a eyecatcher, you immediately look to the signature and the not the rest of the map. It's not proper on the map.

Grtz
MarVal