Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
RedRover23B
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:59 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by RedRover23B »

natty_dread wrote:
RedRover23B wrote:I dont think being stuck on a home run ball is a problem even with two players left unless the other player is a jerk and malicously continues on the game which i dont see players doing.


No, you don't get it. If one player is stuck on home runs, and the other player doesn't have any pitchers, then the game can not end, regardless of the intentions of the players. In that situation, neither player can eliminate the other, so the game goes on forever.



As long as there is one guy in the fild then the game can end. The only way the game is truly stalemate is if there is no guys in the field and no pitchers and both players hold baseballs, because you still have the objective to hold all bases.

The game will always continue because there will always be a guy in the field to continue to get the reinforcements and eventually take all the bases.
Registration:
Ongoing:
User avatar
Evil DIMwit
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Evil DIMwit »

natty_dread wrote:
RedRover23B wrote:I dont think being stuck on a home run ball is a problem even with two players left unless the other player is a jerk and malicously continues on the game which i dont see players doing.


No, you don't get it. If one player is stuck on home runs, and the other player doesn't have any pitchers, then the game can not end, regardless of the intentions of the players. In that situation, neither player can eliminate the other, so the game goes on forever.


You may be forgetting that there's a victory condition in play. If one player is in the field with no pitchers, and the other player can't do anything about it, the field player will take all the bases and eventually win. A true gridlock can only occur if two players are stuck, one in each home run, and the rest of the field is utterly vacant -- and as long as home run balls can't attack anything, this incredibly improbable scenario can't be avoided.

What is at stake is not whole games, but the discomfort of a few turns. I think it's inelegant to create incentives to strand a player in the home runs, but it doesn't break the map entirely.
ImageImage
RedRover23B
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:59 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by RedRover23B »

Evil DIMwit wrote: A true gridlock can only occur if two players are stuck, one in each home run, and the rest of the field is utterly vacant -- and as long as home run balls can't attack anything, this incredibly improbable scenario can't be avoided.


Not just improbable, but impossible. There will always be one guy in the field, in the territory which took the mound. So the map, in a very few games may have a slow point to it, but will continue. As i said ive played the most on this map and nothing like that has happened to me. Over 60 games played.
carlpgoodrich
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by carlpgoodrich »

Evil DIMwit wrote:
natty_dread wrote:
RedRover23B wrote:I dont think being stuck on a home run ball is a problem even with two players left unless the other player is a jerk and malicously continues on the game which i dont see players doing.


No, you don't get it. If one player is stuck on home runs, and the other player doesn't have any pitchers, then the game can not end, regardless of the intentions of the players. In that situation, neither player can eliminate the other, so the game goes on forever.


You may be forgetting that there's a victory condition in play. If one player is in the field with no pitchers, and the other player can't do anything about it, the field player will take all the bases and eventually win. A true gridlock can only occur if two players are stuck, one in each home run, and the rest of the field is utterly vacant -- and as long as home run balls can't attack anything, this incredibly improbable scenario can't be avoided.

What is at stake is not whole games, but the discomfort of a few turns. I think it's inelegant to create incentives to strand a player in the home runs, but it doesn't break the map entirely.

RedRover23B wrote:
Evil DIMwit wrote: A true gridlock can only occur if two players are stuck, one in each home run, and the rest of the field is utterly vacant -- and as long as home run balls can't attack anything, this incredibly improbable scenario can't be avoided.


Not just improbable, but impossible. There will always be one guy in the field, in the territory which took the mound. So the map, in a very few games may have a slow point to it, but will continue. As i said ive played the most on this map and nothing like that has happened to me. Over 60 games played.

Exactily. I guess the one caveat is with Nuclear spoils... but tons of maps have that same problem with Nuclear spoils. Unless there is a truly compelling reason to add extra connections, I don't see the need.
RedRover23B
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:59 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by RedRover23B »

Yes, agreed. Extra connections will ruin the map, and about the nuclear spoils issue, it COULD happen but the liklihood of that happening is ridiculously small.
User avatar
lostatlimbo
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:56 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by lostatlimbo »

Despite my initial confusion, I really like this map having finished a game on it.

Its even inspired me to try a hockey map with some similar gameplay aspects
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

I forgot the victory condition... Man I feel stupid now. :oops:

Either way, I still think an alternate route to the batter would be good.

So anyway, Evil_d, let me know what you decide about this, and I'll make the graphics adjustments accordingly.
Image
User avatar
Evil DIMwit
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Evil DIMwit »

Let's stick with no alternate route for now unless we get more complaints. The update should make people less likely to run the risk of getting stuck up there, anyway.
ImageImage
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

Quick summary of changes

- make ball numbers darker on small version
- remove home run arrows
- home run balls are labeled "+2, with additional +2 per base held (not counting Home Plate)"

I'll try to have these done today.
Image
User avatar
Victor Sullivan
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Victor Sullivan »

natty_dread wrote:Quick summary of changes

- make ball numbers darker on small version
- remove home run arrows
- home run balls are labeled "+2, with additional +2 per base held (not counting Home Plate)"

I'll try to have these done today.

Wait, why are we not counting home plate? :-s
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."

Scaling back on my CC involvement...
User avatar
Evil DIMwit
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Evil DIMwit »

Because thematically speaking the base Home Run bonus already represents the player at bat, and the other +2s represent players on the bases?
ImageImage
User avatar
Victor Sullivan
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Victor Sullivan »

Evil DIMwit wrote:Because thematically speaking the base Home Run bonus already represents the player at bat, and the other +2s represent players on the bases?

Ah, yeah, I guess. But Home Plate seems to be the most difficult base to get as it is. I just don't see why we should nerf it more. I mean, I respect your decision to not include it, I understand the reasoning, but gameplay-wise I just feel it would make sense... You would still only be able to get a max of +8 from the Home Run ball anyway.


By the way, I am loving the gameplay on this map! I was never a huge baseball fan, but now I'm a huge King of Diamonds baseball fan :P :D
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."

Scaling back on my CC involvement...
shocked439
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:00 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Denver, Colorado

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by shocked439 »

Victor Sullivan wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Quick summary of changes

- make ball numbers darker on small version
- remove home run arrows
- home run balls are labeled "+2, with additional +2 per base held (not counting Home Plate)"

I'll try to have these done today.

Wait, why are we not counting home plate? :-s

Because it's a homerun. In real baseball you get a run for hitting the homerun (the initial 2) and a run for every player on base. Since no player baserunner can occupy homeplate you'd be doubly rewarding the batter.
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

Update time!

[bigimg]http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/3835/baseball15.png[/bigimg]

[bigimg]http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/4605/baseball15s.png[/bigimg]
Image
carlpgoodrich
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by carlpgoodrich »

Quick comment: its "home plate" not "home base". Just change that one word.
Riskismy
Posts: 391
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Copenhagen

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Riskismy »

What came out of the talk about starting armies and neutrals on the mound?
Image
User avatar
Evil DIMwit
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Evil DIMwit »

Limiting players to one starting position should knock out most if not all of the starting army problems. In my observation the mound doesn't need to be adjusted either way right now, given the other adjustments.
ImageImage
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

carlpgoodrich wrote:Quick comment: its "home plate" not "home base". Just change that one word.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_field#Home_plate

Home plate
"Home plate" redirects here. For other uses, see Home plate (disambiguation).

Home plate, formally designated home base in the rules, is the final base that a player must touch to score. Unlike the other bases, home plate is a five-sided slab of whitened rubber that is set at ground level. The use of rubber was developed by Robert Keating, who pitched one game for the 1887 Baltimore Orioles. Previously, more dangerously, the plate was made of stone, iron or wood.[2]
Image
carlpgoodrich
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by carlpgoodrich »

Well, it is always referred to as home plate. For baseball fans, seeing "home base" is just weird. Since this map is big on authenticity, I suggest home plate. (Even the quote you posted refers to it as home plate after the initial disclaimer.)
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

On the other hand, all the bases are referred as "bases" on the map, so calling it "home base" is more consistent and less confusing for those players who are not familiar with baseball... Which is probably like 99% of non-american players ;)
Image
RedRover23B
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:59 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by RedRover23B »

Victor Sullivan wrote:
natty_dread wrote:Quick summary of changes

- make ball numbers darker on small version
- remove home run arrows
- home run balls are labeled "+2, with additional +2 per base held (not counting Home Plate)"

I'll try to have these done today.

Wait, why are we not counting home plate? :-s




Cause thinking about how a baseball game is- you wont have a guy on home plate so if you hit a home run you wouldnt get anyhting extra. Home run ball plus a base is like getting a runner in from the feild so its a bonus. Does that make sense?
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

Well, I guess I'll change it on account of it being "plate" in the XML.

Although, I guess it could also be written as:

"+2 for every base held except home"
Image
carlpgoodrich
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by carlpgoodrich »

natty_dread wrote:Although, I guess it could also be written as:

"+2 for every base held except home"

That would also work :)

Or: "+2 for every base held except" ::picture of home plate::
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by natty dread »

It's a bit too tight for space for a picture of the plate...

I'll get an update up tomorrow.
Image
User avatar
Victor Sullivan
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

Re: Baseball: King of Diamonds (v15 p.27)

Post by Victor Sullivan »

natty_dread wrote:On the other hand, all the bases are referred as "bases" on the map, so calling it "home base" is more consistent and less confusing for those players who are not familiar with baseball... Which is probably like 99% of non-american players ;)

Despite baseball being the "American past time" it's actually more popular in East Asia, like Japan and China (and I think Korea, too).
[player]Beckytheblondie[/player]: "Don't give us the dispatch, give us a mustache ride."

Scaling back on my CC involvement...
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”