Conquer Club

strike wolf wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

strike wolf wrote:actually unvote Senfive.

Just occured to me that the votes that still remaining on Colton probably transferred over to Senfive.

That would be unfair and the mod would definately get a vote for it.

Maybe to tell the truth I don't think I've had to deal with a mod replacing someone mid-day before. I've had a couple of mafias where there were inactives that had to be killed of but most of the time it seems that the mod night-killed them.

Yes, I would have them transfer over, mostly because if someone deadbeats at -1, that's no fault of the replacer's. Plus, anyone who would vote someone who had just replaced would be because their predecessor was scummy or it was Day 1.

Speaking of votes:

Vote Count

ace1217 (1)- Mr Squirrel
strokem1257 (1)- pmchugh
safariguy5 (1)- AceArtemis
captainwalrus (1)- /
Mr. Squirrel (1)- F1fth
Crazyirishman (1)- strokem1257
Senfive (1) duday53

With 18 alive it takes 10 to lynch. Deadline will not be enforced unless activity drops

pmchugh wrote:

Senfive wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Announcment

Senfive replace colton

Yes Sir...

Who remembers me from way back when? If you dont, I am sorry. Not really, but anyways... Which one of you killed my sheriff... if you are nice and turn yourself in, I promise to not put a bullet in your head... but i cant speak for everyone else... lol...

ok my dry humor is done...

I remember your name but not you

vote stroke for not posting anything of worth...

and you have? unvote vote PMC for being a total idiot..

strokem1257 wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

Senfive wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Announcment

Senfive replace colton

Yes Sir...

Who remembers me from way back when? If you dont, I am sorry. Not really, but anyways... Which one of you killed my sheriff... if you are nice and turn yourself in, I promise to not put a bullet in your head... but i cant speak for everyone else... lol...

ok my dry humor is done...

I remember your name but not you

vote stroke for not posting anything of worth...

and you have? unvote vote PMC for being a total idiot..

revote stroke cause you never stick to your morals! (hehe )

Ok, all silliness aside, does anyone have anything? I would also like to point out that if we put someone at L-1, it's a distinct possibility that if they are mafia, that they would kill someone before being lynched. That said, perhaps quick hammering may not be a bad idea this game.

safariguy5 wrote:Ok, all silliness aside, does anyone have anything? I would also like to point out that if we put someone at L-1, it's a distinct possibility that if they are mafia, that they would kill someone before being lynched. That said, perhaps quick hammering may not be a bad idea this game.

That's a very good point, but it is unavoidable. At some point you have to give someone the opportunity to claim and if they cant think of a good claim then they will just kill and be killed, thez comes to mind for some reason. Or they can have a good claim and if it seems others disagree then they can kill. Which basically means if you see a claim you believe to be fake dont bother voting just kill them.

You must go through the same process thoroughly or else you reduce your chacne of catching scum, but once we have found one we must act quickly.

Its better to lose one scum for one town member than lynch wrongly and have the townie backfire on another townie in their death. I strongly urge that if you are a townie who is about to be lynched dont simply revenge kill as you can still win with the town even if dead.

Squirrels Hat wrote:

pmchugh wrote:It will be mighty tempting to get revenge on colton when i can kill, for lynching me TWICE without allowing me to defend myself.

For now i will settle for a BW.

unvote vote colton.

Why kill him if he's not even playing? Your vote makes no sense. COlton is being replaced and your vote serves no purpose but to remove a potential townie from the group.
vote pmc

I think you missed this pancakes. Your vote count is wrong.

vote: Ace1217 for not posting.

Senfive wrote:

pancakemix wrote:Announcment

Senfive replace colton

Yes Sir...

Who remembers me from way back when? If you dont, I am sorry. Not really, but anyways... Which one of you killed my sheriff... if you are nice and turn yourself in, I promise to not put a bullet in your head... but i cant speak for everyone else... lol...

ok my dry humor is done...

I remember you
unvote

pmchugh wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:Ok, all silliness aside, does anyone have anything? I would also like to point out that if we put someone at L-1, it's a distinct possibility that if they are mafia, that they would kill someone before being lynched. That said, perhaps quick hammering may not be a bad idea this game.

That's a very good point, but it is unavoidable. At some point you have to give someone the opportunity to claim and if they cant think of a good claim then they will just kill and be killed, thez comes to mind for some reason. Or they can have a good claim and if it seems others disagree then they can kill. Which basically means if you see a claim you believe to be fake dont bother voting just kill them.

You must go through the same process thoroughly or else you reduce your chacne of catching scum, but once we have found one we must act quickly.

Why state the obvious?

pmchugh wrote:Its better to lose one scum for one town member than lynch wrongly and have the townie backfire on another townie in their death. I strongly urge that if you are a townie who is about to be lynched dont simply revenge kill as you can still win with the town even if dead.

Sounds real scummy to me... especially the bold part...

FOS pmchugh

First real post of anything close to resembling substance... and for all you people who don't know... I am super paranoid... ALL THE TIME!!!

Senfive wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:Ok, all silliness aside, does anyone have anything? I would also like to point out that if we put someone at L-1, it's a distinct possibility that if they are mafia, that they would kill someone before being lynched. That said, perhaps quick hammering may not be a bad idea this game.

That's a very good point, but it is unavoidable. At some point you have to give someone the opportunity to claim and if they cant think of a good claim then they will just kill and be killed, thez comes to mind for some reason. Or they can have a good claim and if it seems others disagree then they can kill. Which basically means if you see a claim you believe to be fake dont bother voting just kill them.

You must go through the same process thoroughly or else you reduce your chacne of catching scum, but once we have found one we must act quickly.

Why state the obvious?

So townies know what they have to do in this game. This was more explaining the game format than stating the obvious.

Senfive wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

safariguy5 wrote:Ok, all silliness aside, does anyone have anything? I would also like to point out that if we put someone at L-1, it's a distinct possibility that if they are mafia, that they would kill someone before being lynched. That said, perhaps quick hammering may not be a bad idea this game.

That's a very good point, but it is unavoidable. At some point you have to give someone the opportunity to claim and if they cant think of a good claim then they will just kill and be killed, thez comes to mind for some reason. Or they can have a good claim and if it seems others disagree then they can kill. Which basically means if you see a claim you believe to be fake dont bother voting just kill them.

You must go through the same process thoroughly or else you reduce your chacne of catching scum, but once we have found one we must act quickly.

Why state the obvious?

pmchugh wrote:Its better to lose one scum for one town member than lynch wrongly and have the townie backfire on another townie in their death. I strongly urge that if you are a townie who is about to be lynched dont simply revenge kill as you can still win with the town even if dead.

Sounds real scummy to me... especially the bold part...

FOS pmchugh

First real post of anything close to resembling substance... and for all you people who don't know... I am super paranoid... ALL THE TIME!!!

Seems like a pretty innocuous statement to me in that I could easily see a townie specifying that townies about to be lynched shouldn't revenge kill.

That said, scum revenge kills will definitely make this game more difficult for us (because scum have a better idea of who they're shooting), so it's important we don't rush any lynches. As was said before, it's better we lose a townie to a scum daykill than to try to lynch a townie and risk that person revenge killing another townie.

F1fth wrote:That said, scum revenge kills will definitely make this game more difficult for us (because scum have a better idea of who they're shooting), so it's important we don't rush any lynches. As was said before, it's better we lose a townie to a scum daykill than to try to lynch a townie and risk that person revenge killing another townie.

It is more clear, now that you restated what he was saying... but I still want to hear his response...

lets random lynch someone. I say senfive, just b/c of his homorific crush on John Elway as shown in his avatar. He also posted above me.

vote senfive

Senfive wrote:Why state the obvious?

Its a helluvalot better than jsut sitting quitely twidling your thumb isn't it?

senfive wrote: and for all you people who don't know... I am super paranoid... ALL THE TIME!!!

What's the point in putting forward an argument then totally invalidating it by saying you are paranoid, if anything this shows you are paranoid of appearing scummy than paranoid of other people's posts as you were implying.

cowboyz wrote:lets random lynch someone. I say senfive, just b/c of his homorific crush on John Elway as shown in his avatar. He also posted above me.

vote senfive

Really? did you not just read the last few pages?




PM... I was simply stating because I was off the site for so long, that the new people don't know my play style... you think my post looks scummy, and I think your post is Ultra scummy, for the fact that you haven't responded other than to attempt to throw the spot light on me...

How much longer is left in the grace period? I just want to know how long till this game gets insane..

duday53 wrote:How much longer is left in the grace period? I just want to know how long till this game gets insane..

It ended a while ago, but just to make it clear:

Announcement

Rule addendum: ANYONE may now be daykilled, regardless of whether or not they have posted. Also, remember all daykills must be denoted in Bold Purple

duday53 wrote:How much longer is left in the grace period? I just want to know how long till this game gets insane..

I doubt anyone's going to daykill on the first day (unless they're close to being lynch). Townies won't because it's a huge gamble, and scum won't because they'd draw a hellofalot of attention to themselves.

We need to put pressure on someone to make this go somewhere though, or we'll never see the end of the random voting stage. So, I'll help do just that:

Vote /.He chimed in with a random vote at the beginning of the game and we haven't heard from him since. There's definitely a case to be made for scumarining here, and I think he's our best option to prod him with some votes.

EBWOP: Unvote, Vote /

vote /
BANDWAGON






hehe

unvote vote: /

if nothing else, hopefully we can prod him into actually saying something.

0ojakeo0 wrote:vote /
BANDWAGON





hehe

your not even in this game

Yer proddin the hammer of my gun
J/k, I just dislike day one, there's no real logical course of action, obviously there are no suspects since you're bandwagoning me, and I'm reluctant to hop on my own bandwagon despite the evidence it would create.
Unvote
Sorry I'll post more.

/ wrote:Yer proddin the hammer of my gun
J/k, I just dislike day one, there's no real logical course of action, obviously there are no suspects since you're bandwagoning me, and I'm reluctant to hop on my own bandwagon despite the evidence it would create.
Unvote
Sorry I'll post more.

You don't post on day 1 because it is quiet? Isn't that sort of hypocritical?

Senfive wrote:

cowboyz wrote:lets random lynch someone. I say senfive, just b/c of his homorific crush on John Elway as shown in his avatar. He also posted above me.

vote senfive

Really? did you not just read the last few pages?




PM... I was simply stating because I was off the site for so long, that the new people don't know my play style... you think my post looks scummy, and I think your post is Ultra scummy, for the fact that you haven't responded other than to attempt to throw the spot light on me...

When did i say your were scummy? And you think im ultra scummy? What did i do to inherit that? Sure i said some things that might seem obvious but some people dont deduce everything themselves.