Conquer Club

targetman377 wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

TheProwler wrote:So you did exactly as I predicted.

DM: "Show me what vaccine."

CC: "Here's a list."

DM: "It doesn't matter if you show me what vaccine."

See DM, like a book.

That is precisely what I DIDN'T say.

But congratulations for just pretending that I did anyway. It's good to see that some people are willing to stick to their dreams no matter what the world throws their way.

But please, try to make your trolling a little bit less obvious next time; otherwise Gregrios will soon be out of a job.

what do you expect from people that belive in the nwo DM some people you just cant talk sense into

So, the fact that Obama, Kissinger, and Bush senior have all made references to it in the live media arena must mean that they are crazy too for believing in the NWO that they are trying to usher in? hmmm

I'm sorry, who is the crazy one here?

TheProwler wrote:you asked CC to cite what vaccines he was referring to. He did. Then it somehow became an unimportant point, in your mind.

Seriously, learn to read. That's precisely what didn't happen here. Go read the thread.

Pretend that it did all you like, repeat the lie a hundred times, say it over and over and over in every post that you make... it's not going to make your fiction true.

captain.crazy wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

TheProwler wrote:So you did exactly as I predicted.

DM: "Show me what vaccine."

CC: "Here's a list."

DM: "It doesn't matter if you show me what vaccine."

See DM, like a book.

That is precisely what I DIDN'T say.

But congratulations for just pretending that I did anyway. It's good to see that some people are willing to stick to their dreams no matter what the world throws their way.

But please, try to make your trolling a little bit less obvious next time; otherwise Gregrios will soon be out of a job.

what do you expect from people that belive in the nwo DM some people you just cant talk sense into

So, the fact that Obama, Kissinger, and Bush senior have all made references to it in the live media arena must mean that they are crazy too for believing in the NWO that they are trying to usher in? hmmm

I'm sorry, who is the crazy one here?

look at your name your crazy

Dancing Mustard wrote:

TheProwler wrote:you asked CC to cite what vaccines he was referring to. He did. Then it somehow became an unimportant point, in your mind.

Seriously, learn to read. That's precisely what didn't happen here. Go read the thread.

Pretend that it did all you like, repeat the lie a hundred times, say it over and over and over in every post that you make... it's not going to make your fiction true.

My statement:

captain.crazy wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:I really expected this to be discussed more. The WHO is now saying that Mercury in your childrens vaccines is okay. Anyone care to side with or against this WHO opinion / edict?

Not "OK", just perhaps not as bad as previously thought.

It was taken out of vaccines years ago anyway.

They just decided to put it back in then? Its still in there.

Your question:

Dancing Mustard wrote:In which ones exactly?

Proof plz.

It looks like you should go back and read... his "fiction" is actually true, and you are wrong... as usual.

Dancing Mustard wrote:

TheProwler wrote:you asked CC to cite what vaccines he was referring to. He did. Then it somehow became an unimportant point, in your mind.

Seriously, learn to read. That's precisely what didn't happen here. Go read the thread.

Pretend that it did all you like, repeat the lie a hundred times, say it over and over and over in every post that you make... it's not going to make your fiction true.

Hahaha! So when CC cited specific vaccinations, what did you concede? Nothing. So then why did you ask? To waste his time? Because if he didn't find any, it would somehow be a valid point? It was always meaningless, just like I said.

targetman377 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

TheProwler wrote:So you did exactly as I predicted.

DM: "Show me what vaccine."

CC: "Here's a list."

DM: "It doesn't matter if you show me what vaccine."

See DM, like a book.

That is precisely what I DIDN'T say.

But congratulations for just pretending that I did anyway. It's good to see that some people are willing to stick to their dreams no matter what the world throws their way.

But please, try to make your trolling a little bit less obvious next time; otherwise Gregrios will soon be out of a job.

what do you expect from people that belive in the nwo DM some people you just cant talk sense into

So, the fact that Obama, Kissinger, and Bush senior have all made references to it in the live media arena must mean that they are crazy too for believing in the NWO that they are trying to usher in? hmmm

I'm sorry, who is the crazy one here?

look at your name your crazy

Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

TheProwler wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

no i work at target!!!!

targetman377 wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

no i work at target!!!!

oh... so names aren't all they appear to me, is that what you are saying?

captain.crazy wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:I really expected this to be discussed more. The WHO is now saying that Mercury in your childrens vaccines is okay. Anyone care to side with or against this WHO opinion / edict?

Not "OK", just perhaps not as bad as previously thought.

It was taken out of vaccines years ago anyway.

They just decided to put it back in then? Its still in there.

No. It used to be used as a preservative, but was removed several years ago. For a time, doctors, etc. could keep using stocks they had, but no more should be left now.

Kids do, however, get mercury from many other sources, including fully natur occurance in some ocean fish and unnaturally in other fish (other ocean species and freshwater species) who get it through eating contaminated food themselves. It is also found in the new compact flourescent lightbulbs, standard thermometers, very old mirrors, etc.

PLAYER57832 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:

PLAYER57832 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:I really expected this to be discussed more. The WHO is now saying that Mercury in your childrens vaccines is okay. Anyone care to side with or against this WHO opinion / edict?

Not "OK", just perhaps not as bad as previously thought.

It was taken out of vaccines years ago anyway.

They just decided to put it back in then? Its still in there.

No. It used to be used as a preservative, but was removed several years ago. For a time, doctors, etc. could keep using stocks they had, but no more should be left now.

Kids do, however, get mercury from many other sources, including fully natur occurance in some ocean fish and unnaturally in other fish (other ocean species and freshwater species) who get it through eating contaminated food themselves. It is also found in the new compact flourescent lightbulbs, standard thermometers, very old mirrors, etc.

Except in the case of this study, where Argentinian children were given vaccines with ethel mercury.

captain.crazy wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

no i work at target!!!!

oh... so names aren't all they appear to me, is that what you are saying?

no i work at target hince why target man smart one

targetman377 wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

no i work at target!!!!

oh... so names aren't all they appear to me, is that what you are saying?

no i work at target hince why target man smart one

So that means that I can shoot at you then? You know, because I can look at your name and assume what ever meaning that I wish about it?

captain.crazy wrote:Except in the case of this study, where Argentinian children were given vaccines with ethel mercury.

What the hell is ethel mercury?

Here is a list of several studies which have all found that your "mercury in vaccines = bad" stance is completely unfounded:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/13/1281
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/c ... /114/3/577
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/c ... /112/3/604
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/290/13/1763
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/c ... /114/3/584
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/c ... 118/1/e139
http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/65/1/19
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12880876

In fact, I'll even compile a list of take-home messages from each one, so that you don't have to go to the effort of actually checking sources, knowing how difficult you clearly find that.

#1:

Conclusions Our study does not support a causal association between early exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines and immune globulins and deficits in neuropsychological functioning at the age of 7 to 10 years.

#2:

Conclusions. We could find no convincing evidence that early exposure to thimerosal had any deleterious effect on neurologic or psychological outcome.

#3:

Conclusions. The discontinuation of thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark in 1992 was followed by an increase in the incidence of autism. Our ecological data do not support a correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the incidence of autism.

#4:

Conclusion The results do not support a causal relationship between childhood vaccination with thimerosal-containing vaccines and development of autistic-spectrum disorders.

#5:

Conclusions. With the possible exception of tics [only in one analysis], there was no evidence that thimerosal exposure via DTP/DT vaccines causes neurodevelopmental disorders.

#6:

The findings ruled out an association between pervasive developmental disorder and either high levels of ethylmercury exposure comparable with those experienced in the United States in the 1990s or 1- or 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccinations.

#7:

Conclusions The DDS data do not show any recent decrease in autism in California despite the exclusion of more than trace levels of thimerosal from nearly all childhood vaccines. The DDS data do not support the hypothesis that exposure to thimerosal during childhood is a primary cause of autism.

#8:

CONCLUSIONS: The body of existing data, including the ecologic data presented herein, is not consistent with the hypothesis that increased exposure to Thimerosal-containing vaccines is responsible for the apparent increase in the rates of autism in young children being observed worldwide.

Hell, in case you didn't notice, there's actually a study here that suggests that it's possible putting Thimerosal in vaccines actually prevents autism.

targetman377 wrote:

TheProwler wrote:

captain.crazy wrote:Your name is targetman, should I shoot at you then?

Hahaha!

Nothing like a realistic simulation!!!

Hahahaha!!!

no i work at target!!!!

Somehow, that does not surprise me.