Conquer Club

Natewolfman wrote:

ace1217 wrote:

Drench wrote:Nate: One comment made by him has caused 2 votes. And while it is relatively scummy among the posts of the game, it still isn't that scummy. Jury's out.

Ace: Mindless bandwagoning is the charge. You use aforementioned weak scumtell, and bandwagon it. Doesn't sit right. However, this charge is also weak. Slightly more scummy than Nate, but still I feel uneasy voting at this stage with such weak tells.

FoS: Ace.

Unvote. I only voted because that was the only scumtell in the game so far, and we have no other leads.

backing out as such honestly (in my opinion) makes you seem even worst, shows that you truely had no conviction in the original vote, and want people to stop looking at you... granted in such a small game I suppose everyone wants players to advert there eyes. My vote stands until I see something else, but this game is going to move slow (This is an endurance game) and I dont for see days being short for this style.

I agree town at this point wouldn't particularly care that they were under pressure and would continue to argue there case not back out and try to get out of the limelight.

pmchugh wrote:

Natewolfman wrote:

ace1217 wrote:

Drench wrote:Nate: One comment made by him has caused 2 votes. And while it is relatively scummy among the posts of the game, it still isn't that scummy. Jury's out.

Ace: Mindless bandwagoning is the charge. You use aforementioned weak scumtell, and bandwagon it. Doesn't sit right. However, this charge is also weak. Slightly more scummy than Nate, but still I feel uneasy voting at this stage with such weak tells.

FoS: Ace.

Unvote. I only voted because that was the only scumtell in the game so far, and we have no other leads.

backing out as such honestly (in my opinion) makes you seem even worst, shows that you truely had no conviction in the original vote, and want people to stop looking at you... granted in such a small game I suppose everyone wants players to advert there eyes. My vote stands until I see something else, but this game is going to move slow (This is an endurance game) and I dont for see days being short for this style.

I agree town at this point wouldn't particularly care that they were under pressure and would continue to argue there case not back out and try to get out of the limelight.

I find two problems with this, 1. I was L-1, and 2. If I die tomorrow one misplaced vote is a loss.

Alright. We've got one week left. Since apparently Nate and ace aren't being lynched, who are we looking at next?

Drench?

Drench wrote:More tomorrow.

Promising content but not delivering? I consider it somewhat scummy.

pmchugh?

pmchugh wrote:unvote vote stroop, for random vote stage bandwaggoning. Yes in this game 2 votes is a BW.

Very quick to jump on me after a second vote after a random. Recently I just happened to stumble across this little gem:

pmchugh wrote:My vote wasn't bandwagoning because the first vote was random.

(Source: Virgin Hologram's C9+2 Game)
I totally agree. It does mean you voted me for nothing though.

You could argue that my vote was random too, but I clearly stated a reason.

ani?

animorpherv1 wrote:[v]vote:mafia[/b] because we are guaranteed to hit one.

Pure genius.

animorpherv1 wrote:vote:ace1217

I think he may be scum more than Nate.

Putting ace at L-1 for one bandwagon vote, much like ani's vote here.

Me?
Maybe someone else should do this one.

Meanwhile, unvote vote ani for bandwagoning someone over a bandwagon vote.

Hey, at least I Iooked at the post in question before voting. I agree with Nate ATM, and have little else to say.

Stroop wrote:pmchugh?

pmchugh wrote:unvote vote stroop, for random vote stage bandwaggoning. Yes in this game 2 votes is a BW.

Very quick to jump on me after a second vote after a random. Recently I just happened to stumble across this little gem:

pmchugh wrote:My vote wasn't bandwagoning because the first vote was random.

(Source: Virgin Hologram's C9+2 Game)
I totally agree. It does mean you voted me for nothing though.

You could argue that my vote was random too, but I clearly stated a reason.

Someone has been doing some serious meta, but not that thats a bad thing.

My reasoning behind the vote is the same as yours, you have to pick up the scummiest thing you can when not much is going on and that's the scummiest thing I saw. Im sure if you went through all your games you would find you contradicting yourself at least once. Remember people can change there methods otherwise we wouldn't get much better.

Stroop wrote:Alright. We've got one week left. Since apparently Nate and ace aren't being lynched, who are we looking at next?...

....Meanwhile, unvote vote ani for bandwagoning someone over a bandwagon vote.

So your looking for someone to bandwagon and you choose someone who is bandwagoning someone over a bandwagon vote as your bandwagon target.

Lets face it we need a bandwagon to get a lynch and we need to look at who is bwing for poor reasons or without care for who they target.

pmchugh wrote:

Stroop wrote:pmchugh?

pmchugh wrote:unvote vote stroop, for random vote stage bandwaggoning. Yes in this game 2 votes is a BW.

Very quick to jump on me after a second vote after a random. Recently I just happened to stumble across this little gem:

pmchugh wrote:My vote wasn't bandwagoning because the first vote was random.

(Source: Virgin Hologram's C9+2 Game)
I totally agree. It does mean you voted me for nothing though.

You could argue that my vote was random too, but I clearly stated a reason.

Someone has been doing some serious meta, but not that thats a bad thing.

My reasoning behind the vote is the same as yours, you have to pick up the scummiest thing you can when not much is going on and that's the scummiest thing I saw. Im sure if you went through all your games you would find you contradicting yourself at least once. Remember people can change there methods otherwise we wouldn't get much better.

Serious accidental meta even. Though I can't remember why I read through that game again

Anyway, I didn't really think you were scummy for it, I just felt I couldn't leave you out of my post.

Stroop wrote:Alright. We've got one week left. Since apparently Nate and ace aren't being lynched, who are we looking at next?...

....Meanwhile, unvote vote ani for bandwagoning someone over a bandwagon vote.

So your looking for someone to bandwagon and you choose someone who is bandwagoning someone over a bandwagon vote as your bandwagon target.

Lets face it we need a bandwagon to get a lynch and we need to look at who is bwing for poor reasons or without care for who they target.

I'm not voting him simply because he's bandwagoning. I'm voting ani because his vote on ace is more ore less the same as ace's vote on Nate.

It's like voting an inactive when you've been even less active yourself.

Or voting no lynch, then unvoting and voting the next person to vote no lynch.

Or being on a bandwagon with someone else, then voting them for that particular bandwagon.

edit

With the rule change, those voting ace need to be sure that they want to lynch ace or unvote.

Also, I think ani is scummier

Stroop wrote:With the rule change, those voting ace need to be sure that they want to lynch ace or unvote.

Also, I think ani is scummier

Trying to protect your scumbuddy much?

pmchugh wrote:

Stroop wrote:With the rule change, those voting ace need to be sure that they want to lynch ace or unvote.

Also, I think ani is scummier

Trying to protect your scumbuddy much?

No, though I know it looks like that. Lynching someone over one bandwagon vote just seems ridiculous to me, especially when there are worse out there.

Hammer ace please drench or stroop otherwise this game is going no where.

pmchugh wrote:Hammer ace please drench or stroop otherwise this game is going no where.

We passed the deadline 2 days ago

edit

Drench wrote:For what it's worth, Vote: Ace, as otherwise we're getting No Lynch. Hopefully IB takes deadline as when he declares night.

[fingers crossed]

The new deadline rule would've lynched ace anyway.

Ace, you twat... bandwagoning like that in such a small game?

I want a better scum partner if you make me scum in any other of your games, Bolt...

pmchugh wrote:

Stroop wrote:With the rule change, those voting ace need to be sure that they want to lynch ace or unvote.

Also, I think ani is scummier

Trying to protect your scumbuddy much?

Ahh the satisfaction of saying, I knew it!

edit

pmchugh wrote:

pmchugh wrote:

Stroop wrote:With the rule change, those voting ace need to be sure that they want to lynch ace or unvote.

Also, I think ani is scummier

Trying to protect your scumbuddy much?

Ahh the satisfaction of saying, I knew it!

I had to try

Its Bolt wrote:Well even though its already kinda obvious... ace is lynched, a depressed scumbuddy Stroop just leaves. Town wins.

The biggest thing that hurt scum was inactivity due to the main wagon being on one of them, if it was on someone else then the game would of been a bit different.

Ah but your forgetting that it wasn't a random bandwagon, and just who started it