Page 3 of 7

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:22 pm
by owenshooter
InkL0sed wrote:I'm the one about to get a ban, when Frop has done nothing but flame in this thread? Come to think of it, that's all he ever does. Hm...

frop isn't flaming anyone. the problem is, he is too clever for alot of people, and they assume that what is truly hilarious is insulting, when it is just over their heads and funny on a level they can not comprehend. frop hasn't flamed anyone in this thread and he surely hasn't posted a post by a perma-banned member, so i don't know why you are all calling for him to be banned... an eye for an eye won't make you feel better. frop didn't get t-o-m banned, t-o-m got t-o-m banned.-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:23 pm
by cena-rules
owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:I'm the one about to get a ban, when Frop has done nothing but flame in this thread? Come to think of it, that's all he ever does. Hm...

frop isn't flaming anyone. the problem is, he is too clever for alot of people, and they assume that what is truly hilarious is insulting, when it is just over their heads and funny on a level they can not comprehend. frop hasn't flamed anyone in this thread and he surely hasn't posted a post by a perma-banned member, so i don't know why you are all calling for him to be banned... an eye for an eye won't make you feel better. frop didn't get t-o-m banned, t-o-m got t-o-m banned.-0


technically he has been baiting

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:24 pm
by owenshooter
cena-rules wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:I'm the one about to get a ban, when Frop has done nothing but flame in this thread? Come to think of it, that's all he ever does. Hm...

frop isn't flaming anyone.


technically he has been baiting


ok, i'll give you that one!!! that much i can admit to! however, posting posts for a perma-banned members is just beyond wrong. surely you can agree with me on that one...-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:26 pm
by cena-rules
owenshooter wrote:
cena-rules wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:I'm the one about to get a ban, when Frop has done nothing but flame in this thread? Come to think of it, that's all he ever does. Hm...

frop isn't flaming anyone.


technically he has been baiting


ok, i'll give you that one!!! that much i can admit to! however, posting posts for a perma-banned members is just beyond wrong. surely you can agree with me on that one...-0

meh its better than them creating multis

which twill wouldnt catch

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:28 pm
by timmytuttut88
You can post for perma-ban members I believe. It's only fair to have the guy tell his side of the story...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:30 pm
by Frop
timmytuttut88 wrote:You can post for perma-ban members I believe. It's only fair to have the guy tell his side of the story...

Do I have to point out the glaring inconsistency in that assumption or are you going to correct yourself?

I'm trying to stay civil, I really am, but you guys are just asking for it.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:32 pm
by owenshooter
timmytuttut88 wrote:You can post for perma-ban members I believe. It's only fair to have the guy tell his side of the story...

ha! ha! ha! ha! that is the funniest thing posted in quite some time!!! are you going to stand by that comment or possibly correct yourself as frop has suggested? let me get this straight. guy gets a ban, guy has another member post for him within the forum he is banned in, and you somehow think this is ok? wow... *shaking my head in disbelief*...-0

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:33 pm
by cena-rules
Frop wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:You can post for perma-ban members I believe. It's only fair to have the guy tell his side of the story...

Do I have to point out the glaring inconsistency in that assumption or are you going to correct yourself?

I'm trying to stay civil, I really am, but you guys are just asking for it.


Instead lets all stay on topic of why hes been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:35 pm
by Frop
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why hes been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Wait, we're discussing why he has been banned? I thought this was a congratulatory thread.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:36 pm
by cena-rules
Frop wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why hes been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Wait, we're discussing why he has been banned? I thought this was a congratulatory thread.


yes and no its not in that order

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:37 pm
by timmytuttut88
owenshooter wrote:
timmytuttut88 wrote:You can post for perma-ban members I believe. It's only fair to have the guy tell his side of the story...

ha! ha! ha! ha! that is the funniest thing posted in quite some time!!! are you going to stand by that comment or possibly correct yourself as frop has suggested? let me get this straight. guy gets a ban, guy has another member post for him within the forum he is banned in, and you somehow think this is ok? wow... *shaking my head in disbelief*...-0

Ya, as long as it's not done excessively I think it's ok. Inkl0sed can't keep posting what t-o-m has to say for twenty days. But I think doing it once is not against the rules.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:39 pm
by Optimus Prime
Alright folks,

According to the first post made by cena-rules, this thread is intended to be a discussion of why t-o-m was banned. It is not for discussing the legitimacy of whether other can post for a banned member, who is baiting who, and who should be banned next.

Get it on topic, or stay away.

The Lockerbots will start to roll if you don't get it back on track.

Regards, Optimus Prime

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:39 pm
by cena-rules
Optimus Prime wrote:Alright folks,

According to the first post made by cena-rules, this thread is intended to be a discussion of why t-o-m was banned. It is not for discussing the legitimacy of whether other can post for a banned member, who is baiting who, and who should be banned next.

Get it on topic, or stay away.

The Lockerbots will start to roll if you don't get it back on track.

Regards, Optimus Prime



beat you to asking Im just not important enough to lock

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:40 pm
by hecter
ManBungalow wrote:So what counts as spam in the forum?
Does asking someone to join your game in the forum count as spam (unless you're in the callout section) etc.. ?

We don't know, the mods are so bad at this that they can't even answer that simple question :roll:

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:41 pm
by Frop
cena-rules wrote:
Frop wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why hes been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Wait, we're discussing why he has been banned? I thought this was a congratulatory thread.


yes and no its not in that order

That's odd, you included all the reasons in your first post. I had no idea we were supposed to discuss a rhetorical question, but I guess it makes for a refreshing change.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:42 pm
by owenshooter
cena-rules wrote:is it really that twill hates TUC
does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

well, i for one know that twill is racist, hates puppies, trips old ladies, hands out apples and pennies on halloween, and is generally just an evil person. however, i doubt he hates or even knows what the TUC is... i know i don't know what TUC is... what the hell is TUC? and is this the official stance/conspiracy theory on t-o-m's ban?-0

p.s.-twill knows i love him!!!!

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:43 pm
by cena-rules
I POSTED TWILLS REASONS

MINE WOULD GET ME BANNED FOR FLAMING TWILL

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:45 pm
by cicero
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan? Why?
Or take it as important that 2 members of the moderation team are members of any particular clan?
I can barely believe that I'm about to agree with owen and frop in one fell swoop, but frop is being impressively restrained in his posts.

And, 'back on topic' as we like to say, anyone who remotely knows t-o-m from his posts here at CC, will recognise Twill's description as accurate even if it does miss out on cataloguing every deed in detail ... and equally anyone will recognise the description as being one of someone who had a ban coming, was told repeatedly they had a ban coming and - somewhat surprisingly I guess - got banned.

But, come on, let's keep 'discussing' this ...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:47 pm
by cena-rules
cicero wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan?yes Why?because we always seem to be picked up on everything unlike other people and clans

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:48 pm
by timmytuttut88
cicero wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan? Why?
Or take it as important that 2 members of the moderation team are members of any particular clan?
I can barely believe that I'm about to agree with owen and frop in one fell swoop, but frop is being impressively restrained in his posts.

And, 'back on topic' as we like to say, anyone who remotely knows t-o-m from his posts here at CC, will recognise Twill's description as accurate even if it does miss out on cataloguing every deed in detail ... and equally anyone will recognise the description as being one of someone who had a ban coming, was told repeatedly they had a ban coming and - somewhat surprisingly I guess - got banned.

But, come on, let's keep 'discussing' this ...

You shouldn't get perma-banned for baiting. That simple...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:49 pm
by hecter
cicero wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan? Why?
Or take it as important that 2 members of the moderation team are members of any particular clan?
I can barely believe that I'm about to agree with owen and frop in one fell swoop, but frop is being impressively restrained in his posts.

And, 'back on topic' as we like to say, anyone who remotely knows t-o-m from his posts here at CC, will recognise Twill's description as accurate even if it does miss out on cataloguing every deed in detail ... and equally anyone will recognise the description as being one of someone who had a ban coming, was told repeatedly they had a ban coming and - somewhat surprisingly I guess - got banned.

But, come on, let's keep 'discussing' this ...

He was banned for spam... We've been waiting for the mods to define spam for over 2 weeks now.

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:49 pm
by cicero
cena-rules wrote:
cicero wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan?yes Why?because we always seem to be picked up on everything unlike other people and clans
That's one serious paranoia complex cena ...
I've never really taken much notice of clans in my time here until I was asked to join TUC in the last week or so. Certainly I've never made a point of checking clan membership before moderating a thread which seems to be what you're suggesting. Even now I'd be hard pushed to list any more than two or three members of my own clan without resorting to the Usergroup list ...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:50 pm
by timmytuttut88
hecter wrote:
cicero wrote:
cena-rules wrote:Instead lets all stay on topic of why he's been permabanned

is it really that twill hates TUC

does he feel threatened that we have 2 mods within our ranks???

Almost speechless ... :roll:
Does anyone honestly think that Twill - or any other member of the admin team or the mod volunteers - is going to find the energy to 'hate' a CC Clan? Why?
Or take it as important that 2 members of the moderation team are members of any particular clan?
I can barely believe that I'm about to agree with owen and frop in one fell swoop, but frop is being impressively restrained in his posts.

And, 'back on topic' as we like to say, anyone who remotely knows t-o-m from his posts here at CC, will recognise Twill's description as accurate even if it does miss out on cataloguing every deed in detail ... and equally anyone will recognise the description as being one of someone who had a ban coming, was told repeatedly they had a ban coming and - somewhat surprisingly I guess - got banned.

But, come on, let's keep 'discussing' this ...

He was banned for spam... We've been waiting for the mods to define spam for over 2 weeks now.

Spam also? God forbid someone to spam and bait people...

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:51 pm
by cena-rules
yeah it probably is paranoia but if you compare t-o-m to frop they are about equal and only one of them is posting in here

Re: t-o-m

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:51 pm
by Optimus Prime
cena-rules wrote:because we always seem to be picked up on everything unlike other people and clans

Because of course it has nothing to do with the behavior of multiple members of your clan? No, of course not. Don't be naive cena-rules, you know as well as everyone else here that several members of your clan can be listed as baiting, flaming, and being general nuisances across the forums.

If you can't open your eyes to see that, and to see that t-o-m was involved in all those things, it isn't the problem of the public at large. I never had issues with t-o-m at any point, he's a nice enough guy, and we even had a fun battle between ourselves after he challenged me to a game on my favorite map.

However, he did push the lines on many occasions, and he was warned as outlined by Twill. He suffered the consequences, and a "revolt" or "campaign" to get him reinstated simply isn't going to work. You know that, we all know that.