[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null
Conquer Club • most dominant nation/nations by 2100 - Page 3
Page 3 of 8

Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:43 am
by mattywuh
Scrap that last post. It's like 6 metres...

Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 10:37 am
by onbekende
BELGIUM WILL RULE THE WORLD!!

and it is 7 meters

Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:18 pm
by Willgfass
Who ever said south america is going to form a south american E.U. is wrong because the countries can't get along together, even when spain ruled it. also, the E.U. will never be a single country if the U.K. and some other countries have anything to say about it. U.S. will be the top if they get people who actually have plans. that's why i'm reviving the Whig Party! Membership starts when you Pm me[/quote]

Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 6:55 pm
by mattywuh
Who ever said south america is going to form a south american E.U. is wrong because the countries can't get along together, even when spain ruled it.


Hey we're talking a hundred years. Take Europe 65 years back.


Also, if the event was to arise where the UK would have to join the single currency or leave Europe, we'd be in the single currency. We're pretty much stalling on the issue until it can be sold to the majority of the population.


I doubt that will ever happen but the UK would be completely insignificant without the benefits Europe holds. We're fairly insignificant with them...

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:23 pm
by Willgfass
the E.U. is a bunch of shit

other countries would not want to join the E.U. and France can not fight to keep the countries together

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:27 pm
by PaperPlunger
just to prove you wrong, I am going to go to libya, and start a rebellion, and then join the E.U.

Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 10:46 pm
by realdeal1
Why does no one think the U.S. can stay as the strongest world power. The U.S. has the strongest army. As some other people said China and India have too many internal problems. The E.U. will never be totally joined to be able to be a world power. And not to be mean but Canada's Canada that will never work.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 12:22 am
by Hoff
Canada is just the USA's little brother...

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 8:48 am
by vtmarik
Holland and Switzerland.

The stoners and the Swiss will survive us all.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 2:08 pm
by Willgfass
canada will be american, that i assure you of

Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 2:07 pm
by Bozo
What I find funny is that almost nobody has talked about the middle east at all, granted some of them are third world counrtys but it don't matter how poor your country is if it has some nukes

Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 8:21 pm
by jay_a2j
We won't see 2100.

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:14 pm
by Caleb the Cruel
none of the above
or should i say none of anything

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:19 pm
by P Gizzle
i think that too many people think of the future as a world like a sci fi movie, or a totalitarian government that rules the world. i think that in 2100, world power will be the same, with US on top. i mean, what has changed from 1900? Germany fell out of power, but the Americans were still near the top.

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:20 pm
by wcaclimbing
notice when this thread was started:

Posted: 08 Mar 2006 17:40 Post subject: most dominant nation/nations by 2100

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:21 pm
by P Gizzle
wcaclimbing wrote:notice when this thread was started:

Posted: 08 Mar 2006 17:40 Post subject: most dominant nation/nations by 2100

and......?

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:32 pm
by jay_a2j
P Gizzle wrote:i think that too many people think of the future as a world like a sci fi movie, or a totalitarian government that rules the world. i think that in 2100, world power will be the same, with US on top. i mean, what has changed from 1900? Germany fell out of power, but the Americans were still near the top.




The US will not be around in 2100 believe me.

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 pm
by P Gizzle
why wont the US be around?

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:52 pm
by jay_a2j
Well, if liberalism doesn't destroy us from within. Gods wrath as mentioned in Rev. 18 will. :wink:

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:53 pm
by P Gizzle
i think that if God put us on this Earth, he's in no hurry to just take us out llike that

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 pm
by wcaclimbing
P Gizzle wrote:
wcaclimbing wrote:notice when this thread was started:

Posted: 08 Mar 2006 17:40 Post subject: most dominant nation/nations by 2100

and......?

thats just the biggest bump ive seen ever

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 pm
by jay_a2j
P Gizzle wrote:i think that if God put us on this Earth, he's in no hurry to just take us out llike that



its been 6,000 years. Not long enough?

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:56 pm
by P Gizzle
well, i believe that in your creation argument u said that 1,000 years wasn't even a day to god, which is probably true. so, it's only been like a week. i think we'll be on the Earth for a very, very, very, very long time

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:59 pm
by jay_a2j
P Gizzle wrote:well, i believe that in your creation argument u said that 1,000 years wasn't even a day to god, which is probably true. so, it's only been like a week. i think we'll be on the Earth for a very, very, very, very long time


"When the Jews are gathered back to their land, THIS is the generation that will see ALL these things come to pass" (Isreal was established in 1948)

Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:10 pm
by P Gizzle
but, most jews don't even live in Israel