Page 3 of 5
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:14 pm
by s.xkitten
CBlake wrote:s.xkitten wrote:its couldn't care less...
if he could care less, that means he cares some, which is not what you were trying to stay...
when you try to defend your cheater friend, at least get the grammar right...
any chance you're leaving too?

I didnt say pyro didnt cheat i just said uca didnt take advantage of pyros score they have been playing doubles forever
i was talking about UCA was cheating (abusing the system) by playing doubles with someone that has a score hat low...but whatever, i'm done...
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:22 pm
by Phobia
UCAbears wrote:s.xkitten wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:s.xkitten wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:s.xkitten wrote:That is just stupid...you know that what he did was wrong, and the fact that you continue to defend him is just stupid. I'm glad that you're leaving if thats the kind of person you really are.
What did he do?
he joined 100+ doubles and triples games, and then dead beated until he got down to one point...he was warned, but he continued to deadbeat all the games except for the games he was playing with UCABears (that he started after he got down to 1 point) so he was banned
Oh. So, why would anyone support him?

I blame the heat wave.

because technically there is nothing in the rules against this behavior...yet...
Then technically he shouldn't have been banned. And I think lack can get in trouble for that. And pyro's parents are pretty mad. But we'll see what happens.
Like lack has said a few times before, if someone hacks the site, is it ok because it is not in the rules? No, it's just common sense, of course you would be banned if you hack the site. This is the exact same case, don't expect not to be banned if you annoy hundred's of people simultaneously.
As for lack getting into trouble, I don't see a case there, how can lack get into trouble for banning someone who purposely annoys people? I don't know pyro was expecting, he was warned, that means he has to adjust to follow that warning, which means he has to take his turns, no matter how many games he has joined. It's like forgiving a multi for "forgetting" that you can't make extra accounts, no excuses.
UCA, you shouldn't leave for your friend's wrong doing, he got himself into his own mess, he should fix it on his own.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:25 pm
by Lord_Paul
s.xkitten wrote:CBlake wrote:s.xkitten wrote:its couldn't care less...
if he could care less, that means he cares some, which is not what you were trying to stay...
when you try to defend your cheater friend, at least get the grammar right...
any chance you're leaving too?

I didnt say pyro didnt cheat i just said uca didnt take advantage of pyros score they have been playing doubles forever
i was talking about UCA was cheating (abusing the system) by playing doubles with someone that has a score hat low...but whatever, i'm done...
That would hurt UCA a lot...Score is calculated by this formula:(loser's score / winner's score) * 20 (max of 100 from any one player)
So, if UCA was playing pyro, It means that he would only get 1 point or something like that...
In doubles games, however, then it's unfair, since the scores are averaged, then calculated...
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:30 pm
by UCAbears
vtmarik wrote:Ok, bye.
Cya

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:11 pm
by treefiddy
CBlake wrote:uca wasnt playing doubles with pyro just to get his score up bc they play doubles all the time and uca played doubles with him when he sucked and they lost alot and he stilled played with him because they are friends....trust me uca could care less about his score...
Funny that pyro didn't deadbeat *any* games that he was in with UCA. Apparently, they play all the time though.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:22 pm
by comic boy
UCAbears wrote:vtmarik wrote:Ok, bye.
Cya

You still here !
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:40 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
wicked wrote:That warning also meant to stop missing turns in his current games. I'm in two games with him, and he never took a turn, even after lack's warning. So you information is faulty there UCA.
hes in like 10 games with me. i saw him move once after the warning and than deadbeated after that.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:24 pm
by UCAbears
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:wicked wrote:That warning also meant to stop missing turns in his current games. I'm in two games with him, and he never took a turn, even after lack's warning. So you information is faulty there UCA.
hes in like 10 games with me. i saw him move once after the warning and than deadbeated after that.
hes been taking his turn in atleast one of the games with you in it cuz he was really excited and kept showing me that his team was about to win.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:26 pm
by UCAbears
AK_iceman wrote:Not really CBlake...
Do you think he should've been banned?
Yes
84% [ 21 ]
No
16% [ 4 ]
Since when do polls matter ak_iceman? Most of us voted for you to be kicked off the mod squad but it didnt happen.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:00 pm
by BeakerWMA
Then why did you start the poll?
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:17 pm
by UCAbears
BeakerWMA wrote:Then why did you start the poll?
To see what people thought.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:18 pm
by s.xkitten
i thought you were leaving...
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:28 pm
by BeakerWMA
Right, but it seems unless they agree with you you discount them.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:56 pm
by UCAbears
BeakerWMA wrote:Right, but it seems unless they agree with you you discount them.
When have I dscounted anyone?
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:12 pm
by BeakerWMA
UCAbears wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Not really CBlake...
Do you think he should've been banned?
Yes
84% [ 21 ]
No
16% [ 4 ]
Since when do polls matter ak_iceman? Most of us voted for you to be kicked off the mod squad but it didnt happen.

Sorry I must have misinterpreted this.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:16 pm
by mrhuhn
i think lack made the right move. if it were my site i wouldnt stand for what pyro55, bolle85, and anyother player like them does. they are ruening the experience for PAYING and POTENTIAL customers even if they are paying customers themselves. GOOD JOB LACK!
UCA you must be pretty upset because your "low points buffer" will now be gone in those team games again if it were my site i would strip you of some if not all of the points that you win in those games because i see that as cheating...but this isnt my site now is it
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:35 pm
by UCAbears
BeakerWMA wrote:UCAbears wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Not really CBlake...
Do you think he should've been banned?
Yes
84% [ 21 ]
No
16% [ 4 ]
Since when do polls matter ak_iceman? Most of us voted for you to be kicked off the mod squad but it didnt happen.

Sorry I must have misinterpreted this.
Guess you did.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:37 pm
by UCAbears
mrhuhn wrote:i think lack made the right move. if it were my site i wouldnt stand for what pyro55, bolle85, and anyother player like them does. they are ruening the experience for PAYING and POTENTIAL customers even if they are paying customers themselves. GOOD JOB LACK!

UCA you must be pretty upset because your "low points buffer" will now be gone in those team games again if it were my site i would strip you of some if not all of the points that you win in those games because i see that as cheating...but this isnt my site now is it
Nope, its not. And, players are players. There are bad players and good player. I think he should strip you of your points that you win for playing the the leader of the scoreboard if this was my site.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:05 pm
by kwanton
UCAbears wrote:Nope, its not. And, players are players. There are bad players and good player.
I think he should strip you of your points that you win for playing the the leader of the scoreboard if this was my site. 
Yeah that makes sense. Beat the best player (point-wise) on the site and that's considered the same as cheating.
Find a different way to boost your score.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:22 pm
by comic boy
I wonder how many times somebody has to say they are leaving, or will never post again, before they lose the last semblance of credibility ?
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:56 pm
by bomb_dt
what he did was wrong. flat out. seeing as you are saying he is so upset, and he obviously could not play all those turns since the warning, it may be *nice* but by no means necessary to give him one more chance once all those games are done.
you've stated what he did was wrong, yet you continue to support him saying that it was not directly in the rules. rules are interpretted and are also supported by common sense. not everything needs to be directly in the rules as it is known as wrong, you shouldn't have to be told that.
i don't play here often and don't know you but for the people that do know you, this has shown them a lot about your morals. you appear to be one of those people that would sue because your coffee was hot and no one told you that. you don't appear to be unintelligent so it seems as if you are just a lowlife. i'm sure your presence won't be missed
He's back and deadbeating like made
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:59 pm
by bbum
pyro55 is deadbeating like mad again and has collected at least another 20 deadbeat negatives in the last four or five days.
He should be banned.
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:05 pm
by kwanton
bomb: Wow very good first post. I'm impressed.
bbum: I think he was already banned.....check the title......
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:08 pm
by Fircoal
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:21 am
by UCAbears
I'm sorry kiddo this was before you even thought about joining this site. So please don't bring up anything else that you know nothing about. Thanks.