just out of friendly interest, where do you get the "ideal stats" from?
nice one for doing this.
suggs
Dice analyzer - statistics
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
DiM
- Posts: 10415
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: making maps for scooby snacks
suggs wrote:just out of friendly interest, where do you get the "ideal stats" from?
nice one for doing this.
suggs
dice analyzer utility for greasemonkey
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
Hmm. I bumped this for a joke, but obviously this has piqued at least one person's interest in the dice analyzer. Having a picture of it seems to be a good advertisement for it.
Maybe if this thread was kept alive, there'd be fewer complaints about the dice, as more people would get the analyzer, and be less inclined to complain when they see their results.
'Course, I'm probably underestimating the ability of people to find cause for complaint, no matter how obscure and wacky...
Maybe if this thread was kept alive, there'd be fewer complaints about the dice, as more people would get the analyzer, and be less inclined to complain when they see their results.
'Course, I'm probably underestimating the ability of people to find cause for complaint, no matter how obscure and wacky...
Code: Select all
Attacker dice distribution Defender dice distribution
1s █████████████████████████ 6004 / 35692 (16.82%) █████████████████████████ 2941 / 17528 (16.78%)
2s █████████████████████████ 5859 / 35692 (16.42%) █████████████████████████ 2911 / 17528 (16.61%)
3s █████████████████████████ 5907 / 35692 (16.55%) █████████████████████████ 2962 / 17528 (16.9%)
4s █████████████████████████ 6052 / 35692 (16.96%) █████████████████████████ 2845 / 17528 (16.23%)
5s █████████████████████████ 6007 / 35692 (16.83%) █████████████████████████ 2907 / 17528 (16.58%)
6s █████████████████████████ 5863 / 35692 (16.43%) █████████████████████████ 2962 / 17528 (16.9%)
Battle Outcomes Actual Stats Ideal Stats
3v2 1995 / 1854 / 1587 (36.7% / 34.11% / 29.19%) (37.17% / 33.58% / 29.26%)
3v1 4144 / 2125 (66.1% / 33.9%) (65.97% / 34.03%)
2v2 7 / 16 / 16 (17.95% / 41.03% / 41.03%) (22.76% / 32.41% / 44.83%)
2v1 114 / 88 (56.44% / 43.56%) (57.87% / 42.13%)
1v2 2 / 10 (16.67% / 83.33%) (25.46% / 74.54%)
1v1 38 / 45 (45.78% / 54.22%) (41.67% / 58.33%)
Overall stats
Attacker threw 35692 dice.
Defender threw 17528 dice.
Wins / Ties / Loses 6300 / 1870 / 3871
I had been hoping my 3v2 distribution would get closer to normal distribution as I play more games and the law of large numbers come into play, but it's actually been slowly moving away from ideal stats. Ie. In 3v2 lately I've been taking a hammering.
Just having a whinge.
Anybody else have worse dice than that for that amount of dice thrown?
ideal statistics
although many people already have the ideal percentages for the dice, does anyone know how to calculate these statistics? i'm one of those people who can't accept knowing an answer without also knowing how to come up with that answer.