Conquer Club

Thank you Tisha! Last one is nice :).

It's funny how things change and images in the media influence what is visually appealing. I remember back in the nineties, just before tattoos went mainstream. Women would very rarely have a single tattoo unless they ran with a motorcycle club. It seemed gross usually. Now done well even a sleeve seems normal.

Tisha wrote:




[bigimg]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3grtbHGyf1r0cmpuo1_1280.jpg[/bigimg]

If you're into the trashy look then yes. I however still enjoy the innocent looking girls!

Maybe I'm just getting old. I like both!

These two in particular are absolutly spectacular and the ink does nothing to detract from them!

Gillipig wrote:If you're into the trashy look then yes. I however still enjoy the innocent looking girls!

It's weird that you'd use a Suicide Girl to denounce the beauty of women with tats...

-TG

Agreed tailgunner but she has that look he's talking about. She could be the worst most dangerous woman in the world but she sure looks like a sweet innocent girl. I find that really attractive too. It's one of my stupidest ideas that I can't let go.

I want so badly to believe she wouldn't at some point make me want to drive my car into a wall!

Thanks to the late Sam Kinison for that truth.

Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

+1

I respect that opinion but I don't agree anymore. While I wouldn't encourage anyone to get them. I can appreceate them. Like any art they are subjective and I like some better than others. These two women are equall in beauty and my favorite of the batch. If the tattoos where reversed they would not affect it for me. They have just become normal like jewelry that can't be changed.

ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?

ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

Different strokes for different folks.

-TG

natty dread wrote:

ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?

Of course! Where have you been the last.............100 000 years?

Gillipig wrote:

natty dread wrote:

ender516 wrote:Tattoes may be more common now, but I still find them generally unattractive. To me, they are a lot like graffiti: one can admire the artistry, and they may brighten up something that would be otherwise drab or even downright ugly, but don't put that stuff on something that is beautiful already in its pristine state.

Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?

Of course! Where have you been the last.............100 000 years?

+1

Gillipig wrote:

natty dread wrote:Is the purpose of a female body to be watched & approved by men?

Of course! Where have you been the last.............100 000 years?

Mostly, not existing.

Where were you when they were handing out brains?

You're such a pedo natty lol


I don't know why but I get the sense andy will like this pic.

sorry yentlemen no not how to embed the link. Go here and have something soft to catch your jaw ready to go. The one with dark hair is my number one, prior to this th etitle was held by jessica biel for a solid 7 or 8 years

http://youtu.be/9lbr8w5rUsg


enjoy.

Use the YouTube tags and just the end video identifier code. So it looks like this.

Then if it allows imbedding you'll get this.

GTFO Gillipig. You suck.

nietzsche wrote:GTFO Gillipig. You suck.

This! You're a sick f*ck

I don't particularly like the photos, but seeing those ^^^ reactions more than makes up for it. So keep it up G-pig.

those legs


*shivers*