Conquer Club

jusplay4fun wrote:If there was massive FRAUD, SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

DBandit70 wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:If there was massive FRAUD, SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

lol they've been showing it since Nov.4

Dukasaur wrote:

Evil Semp wrote:

jimboston wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote: Do we need another Muller-type special prosecutor investigation to get die-hards like Saxi to FINALLY CONCEDE that Trump LOST?

That's all I'm asking for, just a quick two-year investigation by 80 independent prosecutors accompanied by daily media updates and simultaneous committee hearings in the Senate helped by dozens of subpoenas of his staff, family and acquaintances. It just needs to last long enough to take us through to the midterms. It's really not an unreasonable request.

Anyway, in other news, 43% of registered voters (including 49% of independents) now view Biden's election as "illegitimate." Great news - the trendline is ticking up! Our goal is for at least 1 out of 2 Americans to see what they believe to be an elderly insider politician stealing the presidency for his own enrichment - and that of his millionaire, cocaine addict, possibly pedophile son - on January 20. Just 7 points to go!

https://today.yougov.com/topics/politic ... biden-poll

It’s funny how you mood the accuracy of polls and surveys when it suits you, and you use them as evidence you’re ‘right’ when that suits you.

Maybe we found Trumps CC account.

What's 3 x 0?
Saxi's I.Q. is at least 3 times Trump's.

jusplay4fun wrote:Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

HitRed wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

Every state has laws on the books that regulate elections. Setting days, hours, early voting, absentee voting, oversite and on and on. My best result is the Supreme Court says states must enforce their election laws that are on the books. Meaning governors and local judges don't have the power to change/modify/alter state election laws unless the law says so.

Example: Texas law says all voting stations close at 8:00 pm on election day. When a local Judge says his can stay open to 10:00 pm due to COVID-19 he isn't following the law he's changing or disregarding it.

HitRed

President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee have raised $207.5 million since Election Day, according to a statement on Thursday.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN28E012

mookiemcgee wrote:

HitRed wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:Show me the evidence. NOT YET given.

Every state has laws on the books that regulate elections. Setting days, hours, early voting, absentee voting, oversite and on and on. My best result is the Supreme Court says states must enforce their election laws that are on the books. Meaning governors and local judges don't have the power to change/modify/alter state election laws unless the law says so.

Example: Texas law says all voting stations close at 8:00 pm on election day. When a local Judge says his can stay open to 10:00 pm due to COVID-19 he isn't following the law he's changing or disregarding it.

HitRed

First, this really isn't evidence... it's a legal argument. A very good and valid legal argument but proof/evidence would involve more than you just saying a judge said it can stay open til 10pm without provide a link to a news article or something to validate what you are saying.

Secondly, Texas is not a state that would help change the results of the election. Do you have an example of evidence something in this vein occurred in GA,WI,MI,PA,AZ? As far as I am aware the supreme court has not ruled on any cases in these states for the 2020 election as of yet. I have also not seen any evidence that local judges changed the laws in these states because of covid. I have seen that in PA the rules were changed and there was some debate (mainly just by saxi) on if it was done legally or not (this didn't involve a judge changing the laws ad hoc due to covid). My understanding is this case has been resolved in favor of validating the PA election results.

jusplay4fun wrote:Show me the evidence.

There is more.

There is more.

HitRed wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote:Show me the evidence.

When this news came out God said,

There is more.

HitRed wrote:Mr. Negative

jimboston wrote:

HitRed wrote:Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

saxitoxin wrote:

jimboston wrote:

HitRed wrote:Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

Great. Why don't you educate use all by posting the other side of the story then. The logical explanation.

We'll be waiting here ...

jimboston wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

jimboston wrote:

HitRed wrote:Mr. Negative

Mr. Negative?

Or Mr. Common Sense?

Does anything I just wrote make sense to you?
Or are you only accepting the One America News narrative without critical thought?

Great. Why don't you educate use all by posting the other side of the story then. The logical explanation.

We'll be waiting here ...

The other side of the story for that video?

The election workers, which includes people from both sides of our political divide, were moving around the office processing ballots.