Conquer Club

Davie.K wrote:Hmmmm...intriguing.

CaptainJTuttle wrote:We have no obligation to monitor the Websites, Services, any Third Party Platform, or the Forums, or any Submissions or other materials that you or other third persons or parties transmit or post on the Websites, in the Services, on any Third Party Platform, or in the Forums. You acknowledge and agree that Conquer Club has the right (but not the obligation) to do any or all of the following, at its sole discretion: (i) alter, remove, or refuse to post or allow to be posted or stored any Submission or message; (ii) monitor and/or filter any of your communications through the Forums (including without limitation, by means of blocking or replacing expletives or other language that may be deemed harmful or offensive); and/or (iii) disclose any Submission or message or any communication through the Forums, and the circumstances surrounding the transmission thereof, to any third party in order to operate the Websites or any Services available thereon or through any Third Party Platform to (a) protect Conquer Club and its sponsors, employees, officers, directors, shareholders, agents, representatives and affiliates, and Conquer Club's users and visitors; (b) to comply with legal obligations or governmental requests; and (c) to enforce these Terms; or for any other reason or purpose.

2dimes wrote:The main reason I wrote you had a fetish, was to help you see how unfair it is for you to accuse Davie.K of it.

jusplay4fun wrote:...The main points are 1) concern Davie.K's fetish about the number 69, ...

He merely made a common pop-culture reference a few times. Less than five, I believe. Granted he did express lots of excitement but I presume that to be an important part of the joke.

Meanwhile who can count how often you write about a certain former member, who has been gone for quite a while now? Does Davie.K even know who you are talking about?

Sure you don't do it as much as Saxi, but here we are, you've done it yet again, as has occurred so many times before.

by Davie.K on Tue Nov 17, 2020 11:58 pm
God,please let it get to 6,969 again and just stop there for 15 minutes,that's all I'll need

2dimes wrote:Your claim of moving on, is hilarious. If you and Saxi ever actually move on, discussion about "person in question" will grind to a halt.

CC is declining again!
Postby Davie.K on Tue Aug 18, 2020 9:50 pm

6969 right now .... the ONLY highlight of the decrease mrswdk

jusplay4fun wrote: 2) the game does not appeal to those who grew up playing NES (or other such gaming systems) or video games with all the "Bells and Whistles";

Nut Shot Scott wrote:Who's got a line to BigWham? Ask him if he's interested in some professional biz development help for free. I'd be willing to discuss creating a plan and implementing it. PM me.

niMic wrote:

jusplay4fun wrote: 2) the game does not appeal to those who grew up playing NES (or other such gaming systems) or video games with all the "Bells and Whistles";

My dude, the NES was released 35+ years ago. I doubt the site is struggling because it's not hip enough for all those 40 year-old youngsters.

The rest of the points made sense, I just thought this was funny.

Nut Shot Scott wrote:Who's got a line to BigWham? Ask him if he's interested in some professional biz development help for free. I'd be willing to discuss creating a plan and implementing it. PM me.