Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2016 2:02 pm**

madmitch wrote:Maybe I do jump the gun sometimes and get on the band wagon or in this case camel train, but that is better than not voting at all . Tal not voting or not going through with his vote is just scummy, He sits there and gets everyone else to do his dirty work for him. Another thing he brags hat he doesn;t need Democracy and has a WMD , he sounds dangerous and should be stopped.

LOL, me not voting for a player that turned out to not be scum is scummy...hilarious. FYI, I haven't gotten anyone to do my dirty work either, not really sure what you think is there. But with players like you reading things like this out of stuff and players like this:

HotShot53 wrote:
For Talapus, I can see the case on him, however he is (or was?) at L-2, so I will wait until he posts his claim before deciding to vote him or not. If he is scum or recruiter, ragian posted a nice diversionary post against madmitch right while Talapus was getting some heat, could be a buddy.

...

Who obviously can't even be bothered to read posts in the game then yes I stand by my decision that at this rate town is screwed. My vote will remain on myself to save you all the trouble.

BuJaber wrote:
Basically, I'm down to switch only if mitch becomes the lynch favorite.

Because gems like this makes any logical thought or effort useless in this game. So yes, let's please end this day already and see how quickly ISIS wins.

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2016 2:42 pm**

Well how about you stop the pessimistic attitude and try to enlighten us with your wisdom.

I feel strongly about my case against you, ragian feels strongly about his case on mitch. With no better candidates in sight, lynching one of you is good for town because no lynch means another ISIS recruit without us at least trying to reduce their numbers.

Also you know just like everybody else that them not turning scummy is not really relevant; you had a case on multiple people several times and yet you chose to ignore your instinct. All it took for them to convince you was say "I am country x, my role is to help NATO"

At least you unvoted me and aren't pointing your finger at anyone so I take it you think we're all town (people actually posting) but we're all just idiots.

Frankly there is not one single personality that a scum role has, but you continue to play like someone who, if not scum, is not pro-town. I refuse to believe that someone who requested to join the game will just stop trying halfway through just because they feel they will lose.

If you don't want to play anymore request to be switched out and I will unvote for this day to give the replacement at least some time playing.

The way I see it you're giving us more reasons to vote you out.

(sorry if I come across aggressive.. I don't mean to offend. I just don't like your recent attitude because it's demotivating and takes the fun out of the game)

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2016 3:16 pm**

BuJaber wrote:

(sorry if I come across aggressive.. I don't mean to offend. I just don't like your recent attitude because it's demotivating and takes the fun out of the game)

Says the guy who claims openly he wants to jump from one bandwagon to the next based solely on the fact that the other may gain more votes than the one you are on...and based on nothing else. It is your attitude sir and that of others already pointed out that merited my first comment and things like this change nothing.

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2016 5:35 pm**

Talapus wrote:
BuJaber wrote:

(sorry if I come across aggressive.. I don't mean to offend. I just don't like your recent attitude because it's demotivating and takes the fun out of the game)

Says the guy who claims openly he wants to jump from one bandwagon to the next based solely on the fact that the other may gain more votes than the one you are on...and based on nothing else. It is your attitude sir and that of others already pointed out that merited my first comment and things like this change nothing.

Okay then we're clearly not on the same wavelength.. I'm not understanding your actions and posts, you're not understanding my actions and posts, and when either of us tries to explain it to the other it just leads to more confusion.

Good thing it's a team game and we can still win together if we're on the same team if the rest of the players can understand us lol.

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2016 7:40 pm**

Hi all had pneumonia last week. Haven't been able to keep up. Will catch up tomorrow and this weekend. Pt

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 2:37 am**

Hi guys.
I'm taking over from BGtheBrain. Wow - looks like a complicated set up. I'm busy with work all day today til late so I will try and catch up properly tomorrow Saturday and get into the flow.
Cheers

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 6:15 pm**

Welcome Pershy, may the fleas of a thousand camels invade your home :lol:

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 8:35 pm**

madmitch wrote:Welcome Pershy, may the fleas of a thousand camels invade your home

You do realize that posting some nonsense text is extremely scummy? You did not said anything with your last sentence, not to say last x sentences.

Unvote BuJaber
Vote Mitch

... again lol... between these two, I'll go for Mitch and don't won't change a vote again.

BTW this day needs a deadline.

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 8:36 pm**

EBWOP "and I won't change a vote again"

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 8:37 pm**

Deadline will be late Tuesday night CST when I get back into town for work.

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2016 9:40 pm**

dakky21 wrote:
madmitch wrote:Welcome Pershy, may the fleas of a thousand camels invade your home

You do realize that posting some nonsense text is extremely scummy? You did not said anything with your last sentence, not to say last x sentences.

Unvote BuJaber
Vote Mitch

... again lol... between these two, I'll go for Mitch and don't won't change a vote again.

BTW this day needs a deadline.

I have to agree with you here... mitch does have a habit of posting flavor when scum... so I will vote mitch

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2016 1:42 am**

Hi all, my participation level this weekend will be sparse as I'm on holiday in Amsterdam with the missus.

Good to see you, Persh :-*

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2016 2:37 am**

I AM TIRED OF THIS BULLSHIT ! Dakky you have been on my ass since Day 1 . I welcome Persy and make a small joke and you jump all over me and vote for me again . vote mitch ,unvote mitch ,vote mitch ,the only one that needs to be voted out is you. Both Mandy and PT thought you were scum and PT even told us he was a NATO country and had two allies and Jordan was not one of them . becareful who you align with H.S. because Dakky is Jordan.

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2016 11:04 am**

I didn't find Madmitche's welcome scummy, I liked it. However it seems that my predecessor BG did find him scummy and since I'm following in BG's footsteps I have to take that into account. Also I didn't like where MM was on the vote list for Mandy, but then same could be said for BG.

I've done some major skimming and my head is spinning. Can't quite get a handle on what is going on, agree with some theories - not with others (I don't think that was a town vig kill for example). I looked back at Epi's posts but didn't find many clues as to who would target him. He voted Jbfloyd early on. Doesn't say much.

Agree that there looks to be some kind of recruiting faction.

I have to go over the last few pages again which I think will help orient me. Right now I have a couple of suspects but not too much to go on. Need a bit more time and anyway it's still quite early in the game despite 20 pages of material (i.e. early D2). I feel though that we should have plenty to go on if we can see through the fog, but I have to go over a lot of ground.

Would appreciate a vote count

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2016 2:29 pm**

pershy wrote: (I don't think that was a town vig kill for example)

most people have assumed this based on LSU's description of the night, which makes it sound that way.

looking forward to a new perspective to this game. maybe you'll see something others have missed.

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2016 11:16 pm**

Vote Count: 13 alive 7 to lynch

5 Talapus: Bujaber, Wing, JBFloyd, Mitch, Talapus
3 Mitch: Ragian, Dakky, Hotshot
2 IB: Tobikera, TWR

Posted: **Sun May 15, 2016 1:56 pm**

I admit skimming because I just returned from a work trip, but did Talapus give a full claim? Or has his only response been to vote himself. I did actually try to go back and check, but I didn't find anything in his posts - but for some reason, I tend to struggle searching through these threads more than most.

Posted: **Sun May 15, 2016 2:00 pm**

jbfloyd wrote:I admit skimming because I just returned from a work trip, but did Talapus give a full claim? Or has his only response been to vote himself. I did actually try to go back and check, but I didn't find anything in his posts - but for some reason, I tend to struggle searching through these threads more than most.

Talapus wrote:I'm Oman, and I'm NATO sided.

Why claim?, Why not. Apparently the masses seem to like to target the town so let's see where this goes.

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 10:04 am**

Is there anyone out there ? :cry:

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 3:57 pm**

Yes. Thanks for the vote count LSU. I'm still deciding where to put my vote. I'm reluctant to vote Talapus. Tal, we need to hear from you. I think he might be telling the truth but his claim got him heat. Over him and MM I'd be more likely to vote Mitch.

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 5:09 pm**

pershy wrote:Yes. Thanks for the vote count LSU. I'm still deciding where to put my vote. I'm reluctant to vote Talapus. Tal, we need to hear from you. I think he might be telling the truth but his claim got him heat. Over him and MM I'd be more likely to vote Mitch.

You certainly don't need to hear from me...there is no point. Deadline is tomorrow so what will happen is people will lynch me regardless to end the day and get a kill. And honestly, at the rate this game is going with how some people choose to play, I'm fine with it, thus my vote will remain on me.

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 10:14 pm**

Tobikera wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:[
Interesting.
We have 2 dead survivors. One lynched and one night killed. Why would you say that the one recruited last night was a survivor as well? It is obvious there is NATO.We know there is ISIS. We also know there are Villager Survivors. Survivors can win with anyone so their deaths are not a loss.

I DO NOT think there are any significant numbers of NATO players, in fact, I think there are none. There are NATO-sided survivor villagers (NSSV), each from a different country. Mandy and Epi were two (see page 1). I am a third. However, I am withholding my country for the present in case someone else tries to falsely claim it. So we have NSSVs shooting themselves in the foot by killing each other, we have recruiting ISIS mafia scum, and perhaps we have a NATO-sided vigilante or 3rd party vigilante survivor who killed EPI.

I don't think there is evidence for any other roles at present. Once again, Iron Butterfly tried to hammer dakky, but hotshot had unvoted right before him. His posts are unrevealing of himself, and mainly pose questions that give him the appearance of being above the rest of us, and sow seeds of doubt about the loyalty of whomever his subject is. My vote stays on him. Y'all killed Mandy with much less evidence.

You are wrong, however I do believe you that you are a NSSV, unless ISIS converted you last night. There is a NATO.

jbfloyd wrote:Looking back at D1 votes, can I see anyone who might have bandwagoned? Maybe IB or Ragian. More likely IB, but maybe he has an excuse.

When I've been mafia, I'm usually careful not to appear to be bandwagoning. HotShot's vote on Epi sticks out to me as accomplishing little while trying to appear participatory, but given what we sort of know about the setup, we can't give too much credence to what happened D1, but still, not sure what else we can do.

I do worry about agressive, seemingly competent players like WCG driving the action. It's more paranoia, but it's a good preemptive way to keep pressure off yourself. But for now my opinion is to wait and watch, because I wouldn't want to loose a good player.

vote HotShot

Other observation: game moving slowly is fine by me as I am busy this week. I probably can't post Wednesday to Saturday as I will be travelling quite a bit for work. I, too, wait to see about BG's replacement.

Hotshot feels scummy this game. Just his posts and overall actions.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Talapus

A) for sheer effort in the post above
B) i think bujaber is town
C) i told you all talapus was scum yesterday....

Your real quite today wingy. Not normal for you as town. Were you the recruited one?

The ones I find off today are Hotshot, Wing, and Mitch. Leaning Wing just because hes normally leading the charge on people to be hung.
However Dakky is right. Mitch is odder than normal.

vote mitch

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 10:15 pm**

Talapus wrote:
pershy wrote:Yes. Thanks for the vote count LSU. I'm still deciding where to put my vote. I'm reluctant to vote Talapus. Tal, we need to hear from you. I think he might be telling the truth but his claim got him heat. Over him and MM I'd be more likely to vote Mitch.

You certainly don't need to hear from me...there is no point. Deadline is tomorrow so what will happen is people will lynch me regardless to end the day and get a kill. And honestly, at the rate this game is going with how some people choose to play, I'm fine with it, thus my vote will remain on me.

Seems like you have given up. If you are going to vote yourself you mind as well claim.

Posted: **Mon May 16, 2016 10:18 pm**

Talapus wrote:
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Talapus

LOL, shocker from wing. With this playstyle no wonder town is going down.

And my god Bujaber, talk about a lot of hot air. I'm scum because I didn't want to vote for people so far who have been proven town...hilarious. Well let's see what we do with the information than because I think the trend will continue at this rate.
I'm Oman, and I'm NATO sided.

Why claim?, Why not. Apparently the masses seem to like to target the town so let's see where this goes.

nvm guess this was your claim. hard for you to fake being such a tiny country lol.

Posted: **Tue May 17, 2016 2:02 am**

@ PT , you said you were a Nato country, you also said you had two allies , so you should be able to enlighten us on this claim

ptlowe wrote:
Talapus wrote:
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Talapus

LOL, shocker from wing. With this playstyle no wonder town is going down.

And my god Bujaber, talk about a lot of hot air. I'm scum because I didn't want to vote for people so far who have been proven town...hilarious. Well let's see what we do with the information than because I think the trend will continue at this rate.
I'm Oman, and I'm NATO sided.

Why claim?, Why not. Apparently the masses seem to like to target the town so let's see where this goes.

nvm guess this was your claim. hard for you to fake being such a tiny country lol.

Conquer Club

War on terrorism Dakky lynched: Nato & Russia win

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)

Re: War on terrorism Day 2: Iran airbombed(Epitaph dies)