Wrong Turn Mafia Cannibals win

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:44 pm

FOS yorkiepeter. Being very scummy.

philh · Post by **philh** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:08 pm

I may have missed something; I go out for the day and like 10 pages pop up.

William's thinking that the cop claiming to protect a town would be a mistake is silly, but not necessarily scummy. The same goes for yorkie's thinking that William's silliness is scummy.

If there are four mafia, and all the claims are correct, that leaves two towns out of the six who haven't claimed. I know one of them to be myself, and if Iliad is cop we (I) deduce that william, cena, skoffin and ice are the scum. I'm going to wait for Iliad to claim or not before I do anything, though.

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:11 pm

philh wrote:I may have missed something; I go out for the day and like 10 pages pop up.

William's thinking that the cop claiming to protect a town would be a mistake is silly, but not necessarily scummy. The same goes for yorkie's thinking that William's silliness is scummy.

If there are four mafia, and all the claims are correct, that leaves two towns out of the six who haven't claimed. I know one of them to be myself, and if Iliad is cop we (I) deduce that william, cena, skoffin and ice are the scum. I'm going to wait for Iliad to claim or not before I do anything, though.

Well then that means there's only 3 scum, if the claim are correct.

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:11 pm

philh wrote:I may have missed something; I go out for the day and like 10 pages pop up.

William's thinking that the cop claiming to protect a town would be a mistake is silly, but not necessarily scummy. The same goes for yorkie's thinking that William's silliness is scummy.

If there are four mafia, and all the claims are correct, that leaves two towns out of the six who haven't claimed. I know one of them to be myself, and if Iliad is cop we (I) deduce that william, cena, skoffin and ice are the scum. I'm going to wait for Iliad to claim or not before I do anything, though.

Nice to see you pop your periscope up

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:12 pm

william18 wrote:The only reason im not voting for you or explainThis is because im have a strong feeling that Ilaid is Godfather.

Do you really think I'm the godfather? Do you really think I would be pushing for people's lynches if I knew they were town and I knew that I would get killed.

No I'm not a godfather but I'm not a cop either

ExplainThis · Post by **ExplainThis** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:14 pm

Iliad wrote:
william18 wrote:The only reason im not voting for you or explainThis is because im have a strong feeling that Ilaid is Godfather.
Do you really think I'm the godfather? Do you really think I would be pushing for people's lynches if I knew they were town and I knew that I would get killed.

No I'm not a godfather but I'm not a cop either

Cop aside are you any sort of information role at all?

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:14 pm

I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:15 pm

Vote Iliad

I don't really trust him.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:16 pm

icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad

Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?

I am a simple townie

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:18 pm

Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad
Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?

I am a simple townie

Explain the case against yorkie

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:18 pm

Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad
Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?

I am a simple townie

Yes, yorkie was very scummy.

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:18 pm

icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad
Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?

I am a simple townie

Explain the case against yorkie

yes explain

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:28 pm

It seems he has dodged the question, my vote still stays.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:40 pm

icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:I'm gonna revert my vote then. It's the best lead we've got

vote Iliad
Our best lead huh? Since when was yorkie peter out in the clear?

I am a simple townie

Explain the case against yorkie

I will go back to re-read in a mintue but yorkie made a shitty argument agaisnt ET which frankly to my eyes was a very blunt attempt to off a power role

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:40 pm

william18 wrote:It seems he has dodged the question, my vote still stays.

it seems that I'm not on cc every minute sorry!

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:51 pm

You see yes I did push for some people's lynches. But they were scummy. Yorkie on the other hand pushed for
sam's lynch

yorkiepeter wrote:
sam_levi_11 wrote:i say we vote no lynch

Hmm, this puts sam back in the spotlight....surely a no lynch can only help scum.....now why would sam want to do that?

I'm on the verge of changing my vote back to sam but for now I want to hear him answer as to why he is pushing for a scum preferred option

ET's lynch

yorkiepeter wrote:
sam_levi_11 wrote:so u didnt get anyone...

so wait, we have how many townies left? and my role is now nothing. we better have a cop or sumin...

well ET claims to be ranger which I think is the same. But he says he was blocked last night and so can't give us any information.

I don't know, it could be an excuse not to commit to giving us a name to clear or lynch on the other hand scum knew his role and i suppose blocking him could be expected.

Surely though if he is not scum then he would have been killed last night instead of lovo. There has been no counter claim, but then if he weren't ranger would the real ranger have blown his cover by counterclaiming? probably not.

Evidence is a little shaky, but in the absence of anything else vote ET

So pretty much everyone who had claimed and everyoen who claimed a power role.

So what's more scummier go after noob town who were scummy, or going after town after they claimed?

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:16 pm

Unvote Vote YorkiePeter

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:43 pm

He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:54 pm

icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.

I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very important

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:20 pm

Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very important

Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:22 pm

icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very important

Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja

yeah I did once I got back to the thread

icedagger · Post by **icedagger** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:26 pm

Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very important

Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja
yeah I did once I got back to the thread

Not true. You posted maybe 8 or 9 times before unvoting. I can provide quotes if nessecary

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:31 pm

icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:
Iliad wrote:
icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.
I was on the wagon BEFORE ET claimed. That's very important

Yes but you didn't unvote after he claimed didja
yeah I did once I got back to the thread

Not true. You posted maybe 8 or 9 times before unvoting. I can provide quotes if nessecary

I personally don't remember but I remember believing him. In fact I later posted when the deadline was issued and voted kiwi who was submarining(I think)

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:51 pm

icedagger wrote:He pointed out Sam acting scummy when he was, he didn't actualy vote for him though. And you were also on the ET wagon. Evidence against you is better imo.

William is either very easily swayed or is mafia just trying to jump on anything.

It's not that im easily swayed it just the fact that both are being very scummy. So I don't arouse suspiscion i will unvote

Skoffin · Post by **Skoffin** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:39 am

icedagger wrote:Ok I've just read through the entire thread and here are my thoughts on everyone-

1. Skoffin- Skoffin has contributed very little, could be scum or could be town. Was on Kiwi bandwagon but no others- undecided on her.

2. ExplainThis- Having read through the thread I feel very strongly ET isn't scum, but does have a strange play style. Was on Kiwi and Amazzony wagons. However, if he's lying about being tracker I think we probably either have a real tracker or a cop. If it's a tracker, he would have counterclaimed. If cop, ET would almost certainly have been investigated by now, so I think ET's town.

This post seems to contradict itself, at that time you believed ET to be town and yet even though I was an advocate of keeping ET alive early on you can't get a read on me? wut?

I don't really believe Iliad to be scum, also I can't blame him for pushing amazzony or ET for hammering as Amazzony was being a bloody idiot. And when someone be's a bloody idiot they deserve what they get.

I have more of a scum feeling towards yorkie and william. We are close to the end, for every person we confirm as town the higher the odds are of hitting scum, I think he is just trying to save his own tail. He seems to be following every word icedagger says aswell, and it is a somewhat common newb mafia tactic to pick a protown player and follow along with whatever they say to look town themselves.

william18 wrote:I suggest philh or Skoffin. The probability of getting a mafia is 50%.

Right now, do you have any decent reasons for suspecting either of us? Otherwise you deserve to be slapped in the face with a rather large trout.