
Moderator: Cartographers
a-person1192 wrote:has any1 else complained about Lakewood? All im saying is that Tacoma is much larger than Lakewood and it should be fixed. I know this because I live in the Puget Sound
a-person1192 wrote:has any1 else complained about Lakewood? All im saying is that Tacoma is much larger than Lakewood and it should be fixed. I know this because I live in the Puget Sound
wicked wrote:a-person1192 wrote:has any1 else complained about Lakewood? All im saying is that Tacoma is much larger than Lakewood and it should be fixed. I know this because I live in the Puget Sound
Sorry T, but looks like he's right. Lakewood is a suburb of Tacoma, according to Wikipedia. And it appears to be further south, not reaching up towards Gig Harbor. It's highlighted red here.....
The bigger grey U-shaped area north of the red Lakewood is Tacoma. How about calling Lakewood "West Tacoma" and Tacoma "East Tacoma"?
and RK... Tacoma got the DOME!
wicked wrote:a-person1192 wrote:has any1 else complained about Lakewood? All im saying is that Tacoma is much larger than Lakewood and it should be fixed. I know this because I live in the Puget Sound
Sorry T, but looks like he's right. Lakewood is a suburb of Tacoma, according to Wikipedia. And it appears to be further south, not reaching up towards Gig Harbor. It's highlighted red here.....
The bigger grey U-shaped area north of the red Lakewood is Tacoma. How about calling Lakewood "West Tacoma" and Tacoma "East Tacoma"?
and RK... Tacoma got the DOME!
Tisha wrote:i don't know what the big deal is. the size or the territory does not have anything to do with the size of the city, or Kanaskat would be the place to be. i am not moving federal way.. then the city would be in the wrong county.
i'll do either university place and tacoma or east and west tacoma..