Page 18 of 33

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:28 am
by The1exile
Aimless wrote:It's 3:30 AM


SERIOUSLY?!?

Jeez, I thought I'd slept through the whole of the morning and it was 8pm. :?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:30 am
by Aimless
The1exile wrote:
Aimless wrote:It's 3:30 AM


SERIOUSLY?!?

Jeez, I thought I'd slept through the whole of the morning and it was 8pm. :?


Look, I know I'm tired, but you can't fool me that easily. I don't care what timezone you're in, it can't possibly be 8PM. It's either 8:30 or 7:30. Or possibly 9:30. But it's not 8.

:P

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:41 am
by The1exile
Aimless wrote:
The1exile wrote:
Aimless wrote:It's 3:30 AM


SERIOUSLY?!?

Jeez, I thought I'd slept through the whole of the morning and it was 8pm. :?


Look, I know I'm tired, but you can't fool me that easily. I don't care what timezone you're in, it can't possibly be 8PM. It's either 8:30 or 7:30. Or possibly 9:30. But it's not 8.

:P


Well, I posted a 4:20 am and I regularly sleep for 12 hours.

Today though, I apparently slept for 3-4 hours and got the decieving impression that I actually slept for longer...

Bleh.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:07 am
by Fircoal
The1exile wrote:
Aimless wrote:
The1exile wrote:
Aimless wrote:It's 3:30 AM


SERIOUSLY?!?

Jeez, I thought I'd slept through the whole of the morning and it was 8pm. :?


Look, I know I'm tired, but you can't fool me that easily. I don't care what timezone you're in, it can't possibly be 8PM. It's either 8:30 or 7:30. Or possibly 9:30. But it's not 8.

:P


Well, I posted a 4:20 am and I regularly sleep for 12 hours.

Today though, I apparently slept for 3-4 hours and got the decieving impression that I actually slept for longer...

Bleh.


lol, that's good though, sleep sucks.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:14 am
by ga7
Yay for messed-up sleep rythm! :lol:
Well, I suppose you have a good reason Aimless but to me that's too many coincidences/scum tells there... Ah well, we'll see...

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:29 am
by Skoffin
Aimless wrote:14. Skoffin - Missed both lynches.


Check again, buck-o.
LSU wrote: Chad22342 (MAFIA DOCTOR) 9 VOTES (Pancake, red bull, Aimless, Koesen, Pain Killer,Fircoal, ga7, kwanton,Spin ) (firth's and skoffin's vote came too late)
red bull (SERIAL KILLER) 8 VOTES (ga7, Mandy, Aimless, skoffin.Firth, Balsiefen, Koesen, Fircoal )

I voted Chad, unfortunetly I didn't know we already had enough votes on him so I voted anyway.
As you can see, I DID vote Red. So I did not miss the lynches. Cheers.

I'm still reading what I've missed thus far so thought I'd just clear this bit up first.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:33 am
by Pain Killer
Aimless wrote:Unless further evidence comes forth, I'm willing to give pcm, Koesen and Pain Killer the benefit of the doubt, as they were among the first to vote against Chad (and did so before his lynch became fait accompli).


i didn't vote for red bull, because i wasn't around, had a trip to the country planned, that why there's (just gor back) at my name :wink:

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:38 am
by Pain Killer
red bull wrote:confirm and you know who i am coming after :twisted:


does anybody thought about this? :roll:

wouldn't mafia try to kill red bull before he can say all that he knows and suspects?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:39 am
by Pain Killer
and i'm pretty sure that fircoal was joking about the claim, a Fos: fircoal will do for now.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:49 am
by kalishnikov
Pain Killer wrote:
red bull wrote:confirm and you know who i am coming after :twisted:


does anybody thought about this? :roll:

wouldn't mafia try to kill red bull before he can say all that he knows and suspects?


I assumed it meant Spamalot members because he's the arch enemy of them or whatever.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:02 pm
by Aimless
Pain Killer wrote:
Aimless wrote:Unless further evidence comes forth, I'm willing to give pcm, Koesen and Pain Killer the benefit of the doubt, as they were among the first to vote against Chad (and did so before his lynch became fait accompli).


i didn't vote for red bull, because i wasn't around, had a trip to the country planned, that why there's (just gor back) at my name :wink:


So you're defending yourself against my accusation that you're town?

Suit yourself. FOS Pain Killer

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:15 pm
by Pain Killer
:-k i was thinking you were expecting an explanation from me.

oopsie! my bad! :oops:

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:18 pm
by kalishnikov
Speaking of pcm, he's been pretty quiet last few pages.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:01 pm
by mandalorian2298
ga7 wrote:8. mandalorian2298
-Didn't want to vote for Chad on page 8, tried to switch the heat on me
-page 13 Only FOSing Chad when the deadline was coming??
-page 21 First to vote No Lynch after Redbull's lynch
-Tried to start a bandwagon on Spin for inactivity
Besides the facts above, Mandy has been quite low-key, and his posts trying to move the heat were pretty subtle. Now, I realize I'm yet again pretty agressive and that can be seen as an attempt to put the heat off me, but I've been convinced since long and don't want to let him get away with all this. :twisted:

Vote Mandy.


(This is also answer to Ica's FOS, I just didn't want to make the quote too big.)

First and formost: vote ga7 for being mafia.
To respond your accusations:
1) I didn't vote for Chad because I didn't know that he was scum
2) I was FOSing chad, but you were voting Red Bull. I think that it is abundantly obvious who was 'moving the heat from him'. Also, I NEVER protect my scum-buddies. "If you get yourself in trouble, you won't pull me in with you :P ", is my motto.
3. Didn't you read my whole post? I think I presented good reasons for stoping at two blind lynches (though I changed my mind when Aimless pointed out the advantages of killing one more.)
4. I'm pissed of at Spin because of his behaviour of late (He is on my black list). And since we were going to blind-lynch someone I wanted to mix buissnes with pleasure. :twisted:

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:04 pm
by Incandenza
ga7 wrote:Ok, I looked back mostly at Chad's lynch because as RB was SK, I'm not sure it brings us as much info.


Not true. I guarantee that there were scum onboard the red bull lynch, probably more than were on the chad lynch.

ga7 wrote:Scum took at shot with Balsie, a not obvious NK choice as he was in the heat at the end of the day. Wouldn't that be perfect to incriminate his accusers? (And yeah, that includes me too :P)


Also not true. It doesn't work like that. What's the point of the mafia drumming up suspicion against someone and then NKing them, unless the rest of the town was adamant about not killing said person (which was not the case with balsie)

Aimless wrote:That said, a couple of people have FOS'ed/Voted mandy. I would like to reiterate my above statement : I have good reason to believe he is not scum.

That said, my reason is not perfect (that is, there's the possibility that he's still scum; what I know regarding him is not a 100% guarantee); however, I'll know for certain if he roleclaims. Thus, if you believe him to be scum, pressure him, but don't hammer until I get a chance to see his claim.


Mmmmmkay. That's one to think on. Between your list and the above statement, I gotta say, I'm a touch worried. But your voting record is reasonably good, and I have a feeling that if you really were scum, it wouldn't be quite so obvious. :D

Besides, I think I see where you're going with this.

mandalorian2298 wrote:First and formost: vote ga7 for being mafia.


An interesting vote from mandy, which against has the air of an OMGUS to it.

Now I'm torn, and the deadline is sooner than we think. Personally, I think if we try and vote mandy to get him to roleclaim, we won't have enough time to put together a case for another lynch before the deadline expires. And all things considered, I'd rather have the devil I know than the devil I don't, so to speak.

So let's go ahead and

VOTE ga7

and see if he can give a compelling reason why he shouldn't be lynched.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:11 pm
by Aimless
Aimless wrote:That said, a couple of people have FOS'ed/Voted mandy. I would like to reiterate my above statement : I have good reason to believe he is not scum.

That said, my reason is not perfect (that is, there's the possibility that he's still scum; what I know regarding him is not a 100% guarantee); however, I'll know for certain if he roleclaims. Thus, if you believe him to be scum, pressure him, but don't hammer until I get a chance to see his claim.


Mmmmmkay. That's one to think on. Between your list and the above statement, I gotta say, I'm a touch worried. But your voting record is reasonably good, and I have a feeling that if you really were scum, it wouldn't be quite so obvious. :D

Besides, I think I see where you're going with this.[/quote]

Well... I've basically given away all but the details by saying what I have; so I'll come out with it.

I'm a power role. I'm not a cop; but I do have an investigative ability. I targeted mandy with it last night, and my result suggests that he's town; however, I won't know for certain unless he claims. If he does claim, though, I will basically be able to tell if he's lying, and thus that should confirm what I know.

I'm not going to give the specifics of my role, because knowledge of it will defeat it.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:12 pm
by Aimless
EBWOP : The quoting got messed up in the above. Here's how it should read.

Aimless wrote:
Incandenza wrote:
Aimless wrote:That said, a couple of people have FOS'ed/Voted mandy. I would like to reiterate my above statement : I have good reason to believe he is not scum.

That said, my reason is not perfect (that is, there's the possibility that he's still scum; what I know regarding him is not a 100% guarantee); however, I'll know for certain if he roleclaims. Thus, if you believe him to be scum, pressure him, but don't hammer until I get a chance to see his claim.


Mmmmmkay. That's one to think on. Between your list and the above statement, I gotta say, I'm a touch worried. But your voting record is reasonably good, and I have a feeling that if you really were scum, it wouldn't be quite so obvious. :D

Besides, I think I see where you're going with this.


Well... I've basically given away all but the details by saying what I have; so I'll come out with it.

I'm a power role. I'm not a cop; but I do have an investigative ability. I targeted mandy with it last night, and my result suggests that he's town; however, I won't know for certain unless he claims. If he does claim, though, I will basically be able to tell if he's lying, and thus that should confirm what I know.

I'm not going to give the specifics of my role, because knowledge of it will defeat it.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:44 pm
by Incandenza
Okay, you want to hear something entertaining? I just googled 'ebwop' as I couldn't recall exactly what the acronym stood for, and CC popped up in results 3 and 4. Do it, it's funny.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:20 pm
by Koesen
unvote
vote ga7


Explanation will follow tomorrow when I have more time.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:13 pm
by Fircoal
Incandenza wrote:Okay, you want to hear something entertaining? I just googled 'ebwop' as I couldn't recall exactly what the acronym stood for, and CC popped up in results 3 and 4. Do it, it's funny.


On google ya, but on YAhoo, it's not. ;)

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:16 pm
by The1exile
Incandenza wrote:Okay, you want to hear something entertaining? I just googled 'ebwop' as I couldn't recall exactly what the acronym stood for, and CC popped up in results 3 and 4. Do it, it's funny.


try OMGUS.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:54 pm
by pancakemix
kalishnikov wrote:Speaking of pcm, he's been pretty quiet last few pages.


Yeah... I've kind of been addicted to my Wii lately...

Pain Killer wrote:
red bull wrote:confirm and you know who i am coming after :twisted:


does anybody thought about this? :roll:

wouldn't mafia try to kill red bull before he can say all that he knows and suspects?


Are you implying something?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:13 pm
by Fircoal
pancakemix wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:Speaking of pcm, he's been pretty quiet last few pages.


Yeah... I've kind of been addicted to my Wii lately...


What game(s)?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:16 pm
by pancakemix
Fircoal wrote:
pancakemix wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:Speaking of pcm, he's been pretty quiet last few pages.


Yeah... I've kind of been addicted to my Wii lately...


What game(s)?


Paper Mario (26 hours... :shock: ), Starfox 64, and Zelda II: Adventure of Link.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:46 pm
by Fircoal
pancakemix wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
pancakemix wrote:
kalishnikov wrote:Speaking of pcm, he's been pretty quiet last few pages.


Yeah... I've kind of been addicted to my Wii lately...


What game(s)?


Paper Mario (26 hours... :shock: ), Starfox 64, and Zelda II: Adventure of Link.


Cool, Paper MArio is a fun game, I might have S64 for N64, I'm not into any games that much right now.