Page 18 of 23
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:00 pm
by red bull
alright this is my take on this game ..... I LOOK SCUMMY im really sorry guys

but i would have to say it is not a doc but a roleblocker but right now i would not push for a claim beacuse there are atleast 2 more maifa
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:15 pm
by I GOT SERVED
Neither a doc nor a roleblocker has died, so we can't rule out either of them.
And I would advise against a roleclaim.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:25 pm
by MountainLion
Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:27 pm
by red bull
MountainLion wrote:Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
take your vote off mt ..... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:32 pm
by Fircoal
MountainLion wrote:Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
Why because if the roleblocker blocked scum twice, he can claim, tell the person, and we'll know one more scum. Where's the bad? After that the doc protects Mandy, and we get another investigation.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:49 pm
by MountainLion
IF there is a roleblocker and they've blocked two days in row, what's to stop them from continuing to block again? Maybe there's a godfather and that player is the only mafia member who can send in the kill. If the roleblocker doesn't claim, then they can just keep blocking the godfather, right?
Let's say the roleblocker claimed and pointed out the player that turns out to be the godfather. We get the godfather, but the next night there would be a kill because the blocker wouldn't know who to block. The mafia NEEDS it's night kills, but would they trade the godfather for more night kills?
This is confusing...what do the rest of you think?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:23 pm
by I GOT SERVED
MountainLion wrote:Let's say the roleblocker claimed and pointed out the player that turns out to be the godfather. We get the godfather, but the next night there would be a kill because the blocker wouldn't know who to block. The mafia NEEDS it's night kills, but would they trade the godfather for more night kills?
This is confusing...what do the rest of you think?
That's an excellent point you have there....
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:29 pm
by Fircoal
MountainLion wrote:IF there is a roleblocker and they've blocked two days in row, what's to stop them from continuing to block again? Maybe there's a godfather and that player is the only mafia member who can send in the kill. If the roleblocker doesn't claim, then they can just keep blocking the godfather, right?
Let's say the roleblocker claimed and pointed out the player that turns out to be the godfather. We get the godfather, but the next night there would be a kill because the blocker wouldn't know who to block. The mafia NEEDS it's night kills, but would they trade the godfather for more night kills?
This is confusing...what do the rest of you think?
I agree, that is the one thing that is bad. Maybe, we should save the roleblocker claim until later. But still we can get a free chance at scum. Then another investagation, either way I think this game is pretty much won by the town.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:59 pm
by I GOT SERVED
Fircoal wrote:either way I think this game is pretty much won by the town.
I wouldn't go so far to say that yet. Maybe once we get another scum bag.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:07 pm
by MountainLion
red bull wrote:MountainLion wrote:Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
take your vote off mt ..... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
why should I take my vote off, red bull?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:11 pm
by red bull
MountainLion wrote:red bull wrote:MountainLion wrote:Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
take your vote off mt ..... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
why should I take my vote off, red bull?
beacuse i saw something.... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:13 pm
by Fircoal
red bull wrote:MountainLion wrote:red bull wrote:MountainLion wrote:Well we've heard from everyone on this day except Exile.
Fircoal suggested that if there's a roleblocker they should claim. But would that be a good idea? The last two nights no one has been killed and Mandy has been able to survive and help us with his investigations. The way this game is going, I agree with IGS that a roleclaim would be bad. I think Fircoal knows this...
Vote Fircoal
take your vote off mt ..... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
why should I take my vote off, red bull?
beacuse i saw something.... fircoal who do you think is being blocked ?
Sadly, I have no idea.
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:14 pm
by MountainLion
huh?
Unvote
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:42 pm
by mandalorian2298
MountainLion wrote:huh?
Unvote
I sense a theory a-brewing!

Let's hear it red bull.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:57 pm
by MountainLion
mandalorian2298 wrote:Intead finding scumminest in people, I try to find who is a goodness and towneines.
Hmmm....is towneines a word?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:52 pm
by Aimless
Well, I'm going to
Vote: red bull.
I know he has an excuse with his work, but that makes easy cover if he were actually submarining scum. Plus, I don't want us to no lynch again, so I'm going to have to vote for someone. Out of the people who haven't been confirmed by mandalorian (assuming he's not naive), red bull is the one I'm least certain of, so he seems like the best lynch target.
That said, I'm not really getting a scum vibe from anyone at the moment (this game is too slow

), so I don't really have much confidence in that vote. It's likely to change if a better target comes up.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:57 pm
by MountainLion
red bull, tell us what you're thinking! The suspense is killing me

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:26 pm
by I GOT SERVED
Aimless wrote:Well, I'm going to
Vote: red bull.
I know he has an excuse with his work, but that makes easy cover if he were actually submarining scum. Plus, I don't want us to no lynch again, so I'm going to have to vote for someone. Out of the people who haven't been confirmed by mandalorian (assuming he's not naive), red bull is the one I'm least certain of, so he seems like the best lynch target.
That said, I'm not really getting a scum vibe from anyone at the moment (this game is too slow

), so I don't really have much confidence in that vote. It's likely to change if a better target comes up.
I concur.
Unvote (just in case)
Vote: red bull
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:10 pm
by MountainLion
why are you guys voting red bull when it's obvious he has something to say?
Please no one else vote him until he posts! It only takes 5 to lynch.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:23 pm
by Aimless
MountainLion wrote:why are you guys voting red bull when it's obvious he has something to say?
Please no one else vote him until he posts! It only takes 5 to lynch.
I want to hear what he has to say, but we can't wait forever. Like I said, I don't want another no lynch.
If he has a good lead, though, I'll unvote.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:44 pm
by red bull
MountainLion wrote:why are you guys voting red bull when it's obvious he has something to say?
Please no one else vote him until he posts! It only takes 5 to lynch.
i think i know who the role blocker is ...... but thats all lol sorry

but dont vote me i am town {and aimless has some kind of vendata against me since our last game when i would not shut up about him and fircoal

} so dont listen to him

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:47 pm
by MountainLion
alright then red bull, who do you think we should look at voting then?
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:50 pm
by jnd94
Im still trying to figure out if IGS's roleclaim is believable. I will have atleast a paragraph coming up soon.
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:54 pm
by red bull
vote pancake two reasons one he has not posted for three pages and what he did post was "so mandy what ya get " and he did not vote for dummies but for gb. thats all i got sorry
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:01 pm
by MountainLion
Not voting for dummies and voting Biscuit does look pretty bad. What do you have to say about that, pancake?