Wow, I don't really know where to start with this one.
Aleena wrote:a lot of this is subjective...
What one of you might think looks better - used more of a so called skillful touch - might be "trash" in my opinion - where a more simple approach might actually give some maps a little more class - what is currently happening is a few of you have decided how ALL maps should look - now instead of having a beautiful selection of different types of artistic views on a map style - slowly they are all starting to look alike...
You're right about the process being subjective, but when multiple people have the same "subjective" opinion about the mountains not fitting the map, then wouldn't you as the map maker think there might be something that needs to be changed, and want to challenge yourself to come up with something better?
Aleena wrote:I can point out 4 or 5 maps that are either in BETA right now or recently just got out of BETA which have worst mountains or art work - in my opinion then this map does.....
Again, some of these are certainly subjective, but to say the graphics of a map that is in BETA, and has undergone the same, most likely more, scrutiny then this one, is somewhat ridiculous and insulting. Two of your examples are my maps, and while I welcome all opinions, positive and negative, I think your passion, and need to reject authority is clouding your artistic judgement. Tribal War - Ancient Israel, which caries the theme of desert, the middle east, wind swept sand, etc. has mountains that fit that theme. They are desert mountains and colored as such, like the land itself. While not every set of mountains is perfect, they all blend into the map, and again fit the OVERALL theme.
To that point. You like to mention the "theme" of this map, and the mountains, which is great, and a great thing to discuss, but you can't have one theme for the map, and one for the mountains, and that's exactly what it seems you're trying say. Basically, let the mountains stand as they are, they are the best that he can do, etc. etc. One, they don't fit the OVERALL theme because they stand out like a sore thumb, and as a map maker I would challenge myself to come up with something that looked "great", not just "average", as you say they are. As for Three Kingdoms of China, and the mountains which are just a line, to me they actually one of my favorite, and best parts of the map. They are obviously just lines, but it's the variation in size, and final placement that takes a lot of patience, time, and skill. Also, they fit the OVERALL theme of the map, which is obvious when you look at the older versions of the map with the crappy mountains. These didn't come along until I was almost completely done with the map, and had already done the small map. I wasn't happy that I had to redo them, as I was happy with the ones I had at the moment, but thanks to people telling me they could be better, I worked on them again. I didn't bitch and complain, too much

, and I certainly never considered giving up because of a little more work.
Aleena wrote:It's obvious you guys are not using the same standard to judge all these maps... What are some your friends from past games, that is why their art work passes and this guys does not? Or did they slide ya something under the table?? If so how much, I want to know... I might need to do the same...
This is funny, a joke right? So you think that instead of spending over a year and a half to produce Tribal War - Florida, and the months and months spent on my other 3 maps, all I had to do was PayPal a couple of people? As isaiah said, we would hate to lose someone who has so much game-play knowledge, but when it comes to graphics, come talk to me once you have a map or two finally in production, and you really know what it takes to voluntarily sacrifice your time and energy for thousands of people you don't know, who may or may not think your work is crap.
I am certainly not trying to be rude, and apologize if it comes off that way, but I too am passionate about the site, maps, and certainly my maps.