Conquer Club

cena-rules wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:how uneventful....

meh I couldnt be bothered writing s long scene

thats fine

vote mtg just feels right

vote lord voldemort
random votes are for day one!

The Weird One wrote:vote lord voldemort
random votes are for day one!

i didnt plan on keeping it...i jst dnt know wat to do....

unvote

well, I'll unvote once I have reason to.

The Weird One wrote:well, I'll unvote once I have reason to.

thats nice

I say FOS: Anyone who didn't vote for Rictus.

Freezie made a fine point on why to vote him. I think it would have been in any pro-town player's interest to vote him.

FiveThreeEight wrote:I say FOS: Anyone who didn't vote for Rictus.

Freezie made a fine point on why to vote him. I think it would have been in any pro-town player's interest to vote him.

We the town got lucky with night 2 with no casualty! As for votes, I am not sure who to vote...

I am voting: Daring Overlord5

on a hunch.

FiveThreeEight wrote:I say FOS: Anyone who didn't vote for Rictus.

Freezie made a fine point on why to vote him. I think it would have been in any pro-town player's interest to vote him.

I disagree with this point. If rictus was a day killer he would have worked alone. It is in scums best interest to always vote anyone who looks scummy so if they get called on it later they would be justified in their beliefs.

Too much spam. I really wish there wasn't so much crap to search through to try to find anything out.

But I agree in that as 3rd party, there's not going to be any connection between Rictus and the mafia.

And AD, it's unlike you to vote solely based on a hunch. I'm guessing that there is something more behind your reasoning.

F1fth wrote:Too much spam. I really wish there wasn't so much crap to search through to try to find anything out.

But I agree in that as 3rd party, there's not going to be any connection between Rictus and the mafia.

And AD, it's unlike you to vote solely based on a hunch. I'm guessing that there is something more behind your reasoning.

Perhaps... But I ain't saying nothing!

I guess we'll have to see what DO5 has to say, then. You can't even drop a little tidbit?

Anarkistsdream wrote:I am voting: Daring Overlord5

on a hunch.

i too would like to know what this hunch is

an investigative role maybe?

That's what my guess would be.

but then why not say it outright? without saying it upfront, you risk people shouting "SCUM". It could be he's scum and just didn't want to claim cop because then he'd have a quick counterclaim; instead, he'd leave that up to us to assume.

The Weird One wrote:but then why not say it outright? without saying it upfront, you risk people shouting "SCUM". It could be he's scum and just didn't want to claim cop because then he'd have a quick counterclaim; instead, he'd leave that up to us to assume.

So you're saying that whether or not he claimed cop, he'd be called scum? I think you answered your own question.

The Weird One wrote:but then why not say it outright? without saying it upfront, you risk people shouting "SCUM". It could be he's scum and just didn't want to claim cop because then he'd have a quick counterclaim; instead, he'd leave that up to us to assume.

He is trying to be subtle there in avoiding mafia attention grabbing as we do not want to compromise a princess and cop... That would be bad...

I honestly think that we have good reason to believe him, because there's a lot to be lost of him if he's lied, but nothing to lose if he kept quiet (assuming he's scum).

F1fth wrote:

The Weird One wrote:but then why not say it outright? without saying it upfront, you risk people shouting "SCUM". It could be he's scum and just didn't want to claim cop because then he'd have a quick counterclaim; instead, he'd leave that up to us to assume.

So you're saying that whether or not he claimed cop, he'd be called scum? I think you answered your own question.

Well, I'm just wondering if he did that to avoid a counterclaim

I think we can believe him. Think about it. If he is scum, and not some sort of investigative role, then what he did could be considered a huge scum tell. People would call him on it, and he would have to try and sidestep a lynch with a roleclaim, which could really hurt him.

I just don't think he would come out and say "I have a hunch" without really having a good reason.

FiveThreeEight wrote:I think we can believe him. Think about it. If he is scum, and not some sort of investigative role, then what he did could be considered a huge scum tell. People would call him on it, and he would have to try and sidestep a lynch with a roleclaim, which could really hurt him.

I just don't think he would come out and say "I have a hunch" without really having a good reason.

Come on, mate. That's exactly what I just said.

Well, here it goes. Vote - - - Iliad because I think he's scum. So far, all he's done is spam the game and make completely random comments. On top of that, he posted this right after the we had enough votes to lynch Rictus:

Iliad wrote:So I take it we lynched rictus

What amuses me so much about this is the fact you never even voted for him yet you had to use the term "we' to make it sound like you did something. Rictus was scum, it was fairly clear. Then you FOS'ed all of us for lynching him before we suppossedly gave him time to claim. He had the time, he just didn't use it!

You have posted not one sigle thing of substance this entire game and didn't even help lynch the last guy becuase you never even voted. Covering for your scum buddy?!? Anyway, your reak of scum, so you get my vote. Congrats!

Talapus wrote:Well, here it goes. Vote - - - Iliad because I think he's scum. So far, all he's done is spam the game and make completely random comments. On top of that, he posted this right after the we had enough votes to lynch Rictus:

Iliad wrote:So I take it we lynched rictus

What amuses me so much about this is the fact you never even voted for him yet you had to use the term "we' to make it sound like you did something. Rictus was scum, it was fairly clear. Then you FOS'ed all of us for lynching him before we suppossedly gave him time to claim. He had the time, he just didn't use it!

You have posted not one sigle thing of substance this entire game and didn't even help lynch the last guy becuase you never even voted. Covering for your scum buddy?!? Anyway, your reak of scum, so you get my vote. Congrats!

a) first of all I said we as in the town. No I didn't have a major part in it but that's because it happened while I was asleep
b)Second of all that was
i)he was at -1 and he hadn't claimed tet and some-one hammered. I just thought he should've waited
ii) a small joke
c) I did accuse rictus during the twilight of day 1
d) rictus was third-party!

Talapus wrote:Well, here it goes. Vote - - - Iliad because I think he's scum. So far, all he's done is spam the game and make completely random comments. On top of that, he posted this right after the we had enough votes to lynch Rictus:

Iliad wrote:So I take it we lynched rictus

What amuses me so much about this is the fact you never even voted for him yet you had to use the term "we' to make it sound like you did something. Rictus was scum, it was fairly clear. Then you FOS'ed all of us for lynching him before we suppossedly gave him time to claim. He had the time, he just didn't use it!

You have posted not one sigle thing of substance this entire game and didn't even help lynch the last guy becuase you never even voted. Covering for your scum buddy?!? Anyway, your reak of scum, so you get my vote. Congrats!

Oh and sorry if my posts weren't to your pleasure but at least I added to the game this is your what 3rd post in this thread?