Conquer Club

what are you going to say I'm voldemort now

dustn64 wrote:what are you going to say I'm voldemort now

No, I am plain old voting you for voting left and right like you don't care whom you lynch.

If I didn't care, why wouldn't I just leave my vote and not post?

dustn64 wrote:If I didn't care, why wouldn't I just leave my vote and not post?

for dummies wrote:i believe mandy. he is an experienced player and i don't think he would stick his head out this far without solid proof (investigation perhaps?). of course if he is wrong. then we can just lynch him. also even though nagerous claimed a power role i want a real claim before i even think of letting him off the hook. to this point in time his defense has been: " waah waah don't vote for me, he has no evidence" wel i think he must have evidence and so far you have givven me no evidnce that you aren't scum. to that effect:

Vote: nagerous

this is the second time that for dummies has asked for specific role claim/name. the first earned you an fos the second time gets you a
vote for dummies
your asking every player accused to give themselves a target on their heads. its like you want a checklist for all your mafia buds. cop dead - check. doc dead - check. i don't trust you. your only posts have been to ask peeps for their roles, its so scummy i need to go wash my hands

WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

Fircoal wrote:WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

mandalorian2298 wrote:

Fircoal wrote:WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

Fircoal wrote:

mandalorian2298 wrote:

Fircoal wrote:WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

Of course. The only way to be cleared by the "lynch me if he turns out pro-town" manouver is to lynch a scum (and even then, Town must be consider the posibility that mafia is sacrificing one of their own to gain credibility. I don't belive that anyone should be compleatly cleared untill the game ends. )

mandalorian2298 wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

mandalorian2298 wrote:

Fircoal wrote:WOAH! Long day.

now I'm not sure. Mandy seems to drop the Nagerous case out of random. It seems odd. Maybe he caught onto something. I was thinking that Mandy might be a certain role, but now I'm not as sure. Fos: MAndy Nagerous I think Nagerous's defense was fine for the amount of evidence Mandy put on the table. But I still think that he could be scum. Fos: Dustn64 Either, he's that n00by, or he wants a vote to stick and lynch. I think For Dummies wanting a claim, again is a bit suspicious but not that suspicious. FOs: FD

[size=0]Btw- I think I know what he means by look at my last posts. I just couldn't find it.[/size]

I am not suspecting nagerus any more, due to his hint-claim, wich cou ld explain my results.

Dustn, care to explain why you have re-voted nagerus (excepting the lame attempt to save your ass, after 1 vote )

Hmm, well until I can find the hint, I'm don't think you're cleared.

Of course. The only way to be cleared by the "lynch me if he turns out pro-town" manouver is to lynch a scum (and even then, Town must be consider the posibility that mafia is sacrificing one of their own to gain credibility. I don't belive that anyone should be compleatly cleared untill the game ends. )

ok, cleated from teh top of my suspision list more like.

The reason, I didn't belive his claim is that I would of thought Albus would have more a power role, rather than a simple Cop.

I was trying to belive him by asking questions but Talapus dropped the hammer before he could answer my last question.

XenCobra wrote:

haoala wrote:PLS, pls give me one day
ill show you what i am on day 2

How can you show yourself on day 2? If you don't get lynch, you more or likely will get night killed by claiming Albus Dumbledore.

Depending on his answer I would of unvote him, but he never got the chance to answer. Was to busy waiting for an answer, to unvote.

And he looked very scummy with all the CAPS and what not.

dustn64 wrote: Vote: nagerous

Care to start putting reasons on to your votes/foses?

Vote: Dustn64 all of your unvotes and votes look scummy or noobish.

I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

ok guys, I am going to be honest. It is completly noobish.

Vote for dummies

doesnt seem right with me...

Last edited by dustn64 on Jun 06 2007 22:29; edited 1 time in total

You bet it is.

Dustn, I'm only going to tell you this once. It is against the rules to edit a post. No matter what your reason is. Be it spelling, a mistake, wrong name, putting that error back to try and fix the problem, don't do it.

Geez Thanks guys, look at all the work I have to do...*sigh*

And yes Skoffin, you could lynch me if you want. It'll force a no lynch and I will stop making vote counts, just death scenes..but you can

VOTE COUNT

Nagerous (5) - Alexwales93,firth4eva,Pancakemix, for dummies, Dustn.
Dustn (3)-Xencobra, skoffin, Wiggybowler.
Xencobra (2) -Kernal Kronic, Talapus.
For dummies (2) - Gimpythewonder, Danodukebb

Mandy (1) - Nagerous

18 Alive, 10 to lynch. Deadline in 2 days exactly.

wiggybowler wrote:I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

sorry I meant to add vote--dustn

wiggybowler wrote:

wiggybowler wrote:I do think that dustin is acting the scummiest, throwing votes around. I say we should lynch him then see who he hasn't thrown votes at they might be scum if he is.

sorry I meant to add vote--dustn

Right after my vote count..

I was told I am the mod. Actually, I am a self-proclaimed mod.

freezie wrote:Geez Thanks guys, look at all the work I have to do...*sigh*

And yes Skoffin, you could lynch me if you want. It'll force a no lynch and I will stop making vote counts, just death scenes..but you can

We rule for lynching the mod is better. SAy hello to modkills.