Page 16 of 24
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 5:28 am
by nagerous
lord voldemort wrote:I got it early, gave it to raigan. Got it late yesterday, gave it to samlen
Do you have time stamps?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:13 am
by lord voldemort
When I get home and sober. Happy to provide
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:11 am
by lord voldemort
nagerous wrote:lord voldemort wrote:I got it early, gave it to raigan. Got it late yesterday, gave it to samlen
Do you have time stamps?
it was earlier than i thought...gave it to sam wednesday night
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:18 am
by Ragian
nagerous wrote:Can we establish a douche timeline please too? Where is it now. Who gave it to me?
I cannot trust who gave it to me. Skoffin who did you give it to at first instance... ragi who did you give it to?
I gave it to you. You already don't trust me, so that's no problem anyway. I gave it to chu the second time. I give it to people I trust to be town. Is everyone hellbent that this is a bad thing?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 1:08 pm
by Fircoal
nagerous wrote:As per my last post I am mostly suspicious of ragian. I am not convinced by the vanilla claim. However as we are a bit of a stand off I am willing to vote pika to continue the game moving though I will say I am not comfortable with it .
If chu got told pika was a roleblocker as part of my bussy I don't understand why he would now be suspicious? Chu do you mind explaining further ?
I'm not sure how much I can say. I just know that it might not be all that there is to know about Pika. I don't know anything about his actual role except that it's in the roleblocker family. Combined with his nameclaim which I don't believe I get the feel he's hiding something.
I gave the douche to LoVo a while back.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:47 pm
by nagerous
Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:As per my last post I am mostly suspicious of ragian. I am not convinced by the vanilla claim. However as we are a bit of a stand off I am willing to vote pika to continue the game moving though I will say I am not comfortable with it .
If chu got told pika was a roleblocker as part of my bussy I don't understand why he would now be suspicious? Chu do you mind explaining further ?
I'm not sure how much I can say. I just know that it might not be all that there is to know about Pika. I don't know anything about his actual role except that it's in the roleblocker family. Combined with his nameclaim which I don't believe I get the feel he's hiding something.
I gave the douche to LoVo a while back.
Could be the godmother hooker than ga7 was trying to usurp? I wish you would disclose more as if there is a lead here it is worth pursuing .
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 6:40 pm
by Samlen
I gave it to ragian after i got it. I sent it ragian a little after 12 hours so it mighta been randomly given to someone. @nag I can volunteer to be bussy'd with ragian to help prove/disprove his role tonight. It's probably the best way to verify his role.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:54 pm
by Fircoal
nagerous wrote:Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:As per my last post I am mostly suspicious of ragian. I am not convinced by the vanilla claim. However as we are a bit of a stand off I am willing to vote pika to continue the game moving though I will say I am not comfortable with it .
If chu got told pika was a roleblocker as part of my bussy I don't understand why he would now be suspicious? Chu do you mind explaining further ?
I'm not sure how much I can say. I just know that it might not be all that there is to know about Pika. I don't know anything about his actual role except that it's in the roleblocker family. Combined with his nameclaim which I don't believe I get the feel he's hiding something.
I gave the douche to LoVo a while back.
Could be the godmother hooker than ga7 was trying to usurp? I wish you would disclose more as if there is a lead here it is worth pursuing .
It could be. Sadly I don't really know that much.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:05 pm
by Skoffin
Thing is, if it's not pika then who do you think thw two scum are? While he is a confirmed roleblocker, hooker is also a very popular scum role and we don't know his actual alignment. And if he is a scum roleblocker he can seriously mess up our night plans.
And no one has given me the douche at all. lol
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:35 pm
by lord voldemort
that was my theory on pika a few rl days ago...(almost a week)
my feeling is still on pika and raigan being the two scum
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:40 pm
by Skittles!
Vote Count
Pika (2) - samlen, LOVO
Skoffin (1) - pika
It takes 4 to lynch with 7 alive.
I am implementing a deadline because this Day has gone on too long imo, and the topics have only just started to pick up again. Deadline is Thursday, 16th at 6PM AEST. Meaning at 8 AM GMT the Day will end.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:03 pm
by Pikanchion
I am not a hooker though, I'm a roleblocker. If Fircoal was told about about ga7's usurper half why am I suspected of having some hidden additional half which they weren't told about?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:50 pm
by Ragian
I'm insanely busy this week with exams and farmsitting and loads of other shite. I can confirm that I have the douche. I still have not understood why some are adamant that the douche is bad news. The plan was to swap it between Samlen and me, but I can give it to Skoffin if you prefer?
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:21 pm
by Fircoal
Pikanchion wrote:I am not a hooker though, I'm a roleblocker. If Fircoal was told about about ga7's usurper half why am I suspected of having some hidden additional half which they weren't told about?
Because I was basically told that I wouldln't be told about any "extras".
I don't know your alignment, just your role.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:59 pm
by Skoffin
Speaking of extras, I'm guessing chu wasn't told anything about ga7 being a cult leader. So I get the feeling that they are told a players 'main' parts of their role but not the side parts of it. Besides, let's say Pika is scum; his role would be roleblocker which is what was told via nag's action, but assuming any mafia member can do the kill, that's not directly part of their role and unlikely to be mentioned anyway.
So I suggest we go with a pika lynch. But first we might want to discuss how to best make use of our night actions. Vote pika
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:10 pm
by Samlen
I already gave my opinion on what nag should do. Fircoal should choose their action completely independent of our influence imo to give the best chance to confuse whatever mafia is left.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:40 am
by Ragian
I'm not voting unless Nag or chu are on board. I'm not comfortable following the two I suspect the most on someone I suspect somewhat.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 12:59 pm
by Fircoal
Eh 12 hours left to the deadline and I don't think we're going to be getting any new information so I'll go and Vote: Pika.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:48 pm
by Ragian
Sigh... I really didn't want to side with skoffin and LoVo... vote Pika
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:11 am
by Skittles!
Vote Count
Pika (5) - Samlen, Lovo, Skoffin, Fircoal, Ragian
Samlen (1) - Pika
With only 4 to lynch, I'm sorry Pika but you got fucking rekt.
-----
After much uhming, ahhing, and thumb tumbling, the town did not really doing anything for about a week. Good work guys, so productive! But, alas, it finally happened. A dirty breeder had been found out, hiding amongst the bushes, staring at the villages. "I just wana be like you, I'm so curious, it'd be so interesting!". "Yeah, right", the townsfolk yelled. "Totes believe you, but now you die but your biggest kink."
Pika (Tweedle-Dee (Mafia Roleblocker)) was fisted to death by a pup.
It's now Night 3, please send in your actions etc. etc.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Night 3, Let the fist pummel.
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:10 am
by ga7
Took you long enough

Re: No Theme Mafia - Night 3, Let the fist pummel.
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 6:38 am
by lord voldemort
ga7 wrote:Took you long enough

I said it at the start of the day
Re: No Theme Mafia - Night 3, Let the fist pummel.
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 11:45 pm
by Ragian
Haha. He was already lynched when I voted. What a tool... (Me, not Pika.)
Re: No Theme Mafia - Night 3, Let the fist pummel.
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:11 am
by Skittles!
Hey ho, the night was quiet. Once again.
Day 4 has begun. With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.
Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 4, wolololo
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:16 am
by Skoffin
Who learnt what etc
No one selected me last night so I guess you don't get to learn my role