Page 16 of 27
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:07 pm
by Qwert
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:10 pm
by hulmey
Im sure it could be arranged for the signature to be yours on the map....I would suggest to give youor works to a map maker who you know and trust will carry out the final changes according to your wishes..
But please qwert we only live once and life is too short for all this bitterness.
Good luck in what ever you decide
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:57 am
by Qwert
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:32 pm
by hulmey
My suggestion to you would be:
1. have a break for a while
2. Ask andy to delete all topics
3. start a new and positive thread if you decide to start these maps again
4. dont be in a rush to get your maps finished (the long the wait the greater the appreciation)
5. There are many maps out there make yours so its the biggest and baddest map out
Good luck
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:35 pm
by Qwert
Hulmey you finaly give me good sugestion, i agree with all 5.

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:05 pm
by Qwert
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:21 pm
by AndyDufresne
Are we playing a game Qwert? I didn't know we were.

What are you trying to get at? Your topics won't be deleted. They aren't just 'your topics'.
--Andy
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:39 pm
by Qwert
im back,and i present new look of WWII IWO JIMA military strategic map.
Here large image of map.

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:50 pm
by AK_iceman
The army circles should be centered on all the small territories on the sides of the map. Also, how do you get to Kangoky and Kama Rocks?
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
by boberz
the land looks slightly cartoony is it possible the colour could not have a gradient and just be block colour (but not quite as bright).
SOmebody may need to explain that in proper words as im sure mine are not technical
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:36 pm
by KEYOGI
There's a few territory lables over army shadows. I also wonder if it might look better with the grid system in the background being faded a bit more, I find it very distracting.
Are you doing away with the tunnels?
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:51 pm
by Qwert
AK_iceman
Moderator & Tournament Director
The army circles should be centered on all the small territories on the sides of the map. Also, how do you get to Kangoky and Kama Rocks?
well these is a large version of map,and when i resize these map to be small version,the army circle will go over borders.Maybe its better without army circle?Kangoky-i not create all rout conection yet.
boberz
the land looks slightly cartoony is it possible the colour could not have a gradient and just be block colour (but not quite as bright).
SOmebody may need to explain that in proper words as im sure mine are not technical
You mean normal colours?I put colours to be bright that can be see background.
KEYOGI
Cartography Assistant
There's a few territory lables over army shadows. I also wonder if it might look better with the grid system in the background being faded a bit more, I find it very distracting.
Are you doing away with the tunnels?
I know i just put new version,i will fix these.(i must say that i dont understand these word faded,what these mean).
No im not,tunnels not created yet.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:05 pm
by Teya
faded - make them lighter.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:13 pm
by Ruben Cassar
What happened to the older version? It was much much better...
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:03 pm
by Qwert
old version have some mising things,like maps coordinate, and here things look more realistic.
As concerne of colours i agree with boberz,the colors must be normal without any special efect. Im very close to create military strategic map.Ofcourse only in real military map you dont have 6 diferent country colours.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:17 pm
by WidowMakers
Ruben Cassar wrote:What happened to the older version? It was much much better...
I agree. The one in your sig was much better.
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:48 pm
by Gilligan
What kind of background is that?

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:04 am
by reverend_kyle
I'm a fan of the gradient.
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:06 am
by DiM
the old one was much better this one is kinda crappy.
especially the background with all those numbers.
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:24 am
by Qwert
You guys is incredible,you like old version who is much bad?
very good i will present old version with these new to se diference.
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:26 am
by Qwert
Gilligan
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1324
Location: Conquer Club, where else?
Posted: 09 Jul 2007 00:48 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of background is that?
How can people dont understand that i want to creat strategic military map,and these backgroud its original bacground of attack in iwo jima.
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:45 am
by Qwert
here it a old version:
And new version.

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:49 am
by DiM
old one is much better.

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:55 am
by Qwert
DiM
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2338
Posted: 09 Jul 2007 10:49 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
old one is much better.
Can you explane why is old version better?
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:58 am
by reverend_kyle
Colors are easier on the eyes.