Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:51 pm
...
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
Supermax: Prison Riot! [Quenched]
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=21014
Page 15 of 38
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:00 pm
that poll is old news.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:20 pm
Which do you prefer
1 - 2% - [ 1 ]
2 - 0% - [ 0 ]
3 - 2% - [ 1 ]
4 - 5% - [ 2 ]
5 - 30% - [ 12 ]
6 - 7% - [ 3 ]
7 - 0% - [ 0 ]
8 - 15% - [ 6 ]
9 - 0% - [ 0 ]
10 - 2% - [ 1 ]
11 - 20% - [ 8 ]
None - 12% - [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 39
1 - 2% - [ 1 ]
2 - 0% - [ 0 ]
3 - 2% - [ 1 ]
4 - 5% - [ 2 ]
5 - 30% - [ 12 ]
6 - 7% - [ 3 ]
7 - 0% - [ 0 ]
8 - 15% - [ 6 ]
9 - 0% - [ 0 ]
10 - 2% - [ 1 ]
11 - 20% - [ 8 ]
None - 12% - [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 39
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:22 pm
The xml for this is more complex then I anticipated, but it is doable. Still working on it.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:24 pm
still dont know how this map is being considered...its ridiculous in my opinion.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:26 pm
It isn't ridiculous in the opinion of a significant portion of other people. So that is how it is still being considered. Should the foundry change in such a way that only your preferences are employed I shall let you know.ParadiceCity9 wrote:still dont know how this map is being considered...its ridiculous in my opinion.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:28 pm
just sayin my opinion...
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:41 pm
ParadiceCity9 wrote:just sayin my opinion...
People said their opinions about Doodle Earth, that turned out to be great.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:09 pm
ParadiceCity9 wrote:just sayin my opinion...
i wouldn't have called that so much an opinion as a blatent attack at someone's hard work. and it's awfully crummy of you to be such a jerk.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:23 pm
Coleman wrote:It isn't ridiculous in the opinion of a significant portion of other people. So that is how it is still being considered. Should the foundry change in such a way that only your preferences are employed I shall let you know.ParadiceCity9 wrote:still dont know how this map is being considered...its ridiculous in my opinion.
Can't please everyone all the time, especially with an outside the box idea.
but as --- says...
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:29 pm
ghostlygirl wrote:ParadiceCity9 wrote:just sayin my opinion...
i wouldn't have called that so much an opinion as a blatent attack at someone's hard work. and it's awfully crummy of you to be such a jerk.
well actually it was my opinion since i stated "in my opinion"
notice the quotes
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:36 am
Mibi...
Me and Coleman have been discussing the XML for the guards...
It's not massively easy to get it exactly right with the current plan (despite what I said on page 6(?) - I was wrong...
However I have a plan that might work...
If you could pair or group the guards somehow - then we could work it easily...
So pairs could be...
Each 2 in each cell section. (x9)
The two turret guards 003, 004
The two hall guards 001, 005
The two door (ish) guards 601, 501
And 602 and 002 could be singular groups as they're special.
Alternatively - if you have Warden + 1 guard = +1... then it would be spectacularly easy!!
C.
Me and Coleman have been discussing the XML for the guards...
It's not massively easy to get it exactly right with the current plan (despite what I said on page 6(?) - I was wrong...
However I have a plan that might work...
If you could pair or group the guards somehow - then we could work it easily...
So pairs could be...
Each 2 in each cell section. (x9)
The two turret guards 003, 004
The two hall guards 001, 005
The two door (ish) guards 601, 501
And 602 and 002 could be singular groups as they're special.
Alternatively - if you have Warden + 1 guard = +1... then it would be spectacularly easy!!
C.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:38 am
On another note - I reckon 501 - should be 601, and then 601 and 602 goto 602 and 603 respecively...
C.
C.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:50 am
I actually have something I think may work so we don't have to do that. I don't have a lot of time to work on xml at the moment though. I have a fairly large paper due tomorrow morning that I need to work on. 
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:03 am
yeti_c wrote:Mibi...
Me and Coleman have been discussing the XML for the guards...
It's not massively easy to get it exactly right with the current plan (despite what I said on page 6(?) - I was wrong...
However I have a plan that might work...
If you could pair or group the guards somehow - then we could work it easily...
So pairs could be...
Each 2 in each cell section. (x9)
The two turret guards 003, 004
The two hall guards 001, 005
The two door (ish) guards 601, 501
And 602 and 002 could be singular groups as they're special.
Alternatively - if you have Warden + 1 guard = +1... then it would be spectacularly easy!!
C.
im not a big fan of the pairs, and hte 1 guard =+1 would be ok if there wasn't so many guards, 32. if coleman can't work it out then there will be much reconfiguring to do.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:07 am
I'm going to be trying a warden is a guard version first and then a warden is not a guard version second. I wouldn't expect anything before Friday though with all my stupid college work.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:10 am
Coleman wrote:I'm going to be trying a warden is a guard version first and then a warden is not a guard version second. I wouldn't expect anything before Friday though with all my stupid college work.
Don't let school get in the way of your education.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:20 am
Off topic but I need a shirt that says that.mibi wrote:Don't let school get in the way of your education.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:21 am
What would be really cool is if we could do the following in the XML
But hey - such is life!!!
Code: Select all
<continent>
<name>Warden + 2 guards</name>
<bonus>1</bonus>
<components>
<component>Warden</Warden>
<optionalcomponents>
<component>Guard 001</component>
......
<required>2</required>
</optionalcomponents>
<components>
</continent>
But hey - such is life!!!
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:24 am
I'll send it to lack. Having worked with a schema or two for work I know that may actually be really easy to do. If he is willing to code it for just one map is a different matter though. Although it may be used again, and it will make the gang bonus easier to write as well.
Although it may be used again, and it will make the gang bonus easier to write as well.Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:24 am
Or - if we could specify 0.5 as a bonus!!
C.
C.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:25 am
Coleman wrote:I'll send it to lack. Having worked with a schema or two for work I know that may actually be really easy to do. If he is willing to code it for just one map is a different matter though.
I think DiM wanted it as well so it was in the XML suggestions thread...
C.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:32 am
Coleman wrote:I'll send it to lack. Having worked with a schema or two for work I know that may actually be really easy to do. If he is willing to code it for just one map is a different matter though.
isnt the guard bonus the same structure as the gang bonus, considering you need the gang leader requirement?
is it possible to just do
+1 for 2
+2 for 4
+3 for 6
etc
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:58 am
Hmmm - the problem is the requirement to have the leader...
I was thinking about just writing it out the old school way - but unless I'm mistaken - I make 496 different combinations of 2 guards!!
C.
I was thinking about just writing it out the old school way - but unless I'm mistaken - I make 496 different combinations of 2 guards!!
C.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:05 am
yeti_c wrote:Hmmm - the problem is the requirement to have the leader...
I was thinking about just writing it out the old school way - but unless I'm mistaken - I make 496 different combinations of 2 guards!!
C.
so both the gang and guard bonus will be a problem?