USA 2.1 [10 Mar 2013] Beta Baby!!

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [10 July 2012] V.24 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

sannemanrobinson wrote:As there are no superbonuses why stick to the common colours? Alaska could be light blue and Hawai ocean blue for example.

No no superbonuses, but I need them broken up still for the "Hold all Capitals for X" bonus
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [10 July 2012] V.24 Pg 24

Post by iancanton »

koontz1973 wrote:D.C. a 5 neutral but a +3 auto

this is well worth considering. at present, killing 5 neutrals for +1 auto isn't worth it and, since dc isn't part of any other bonuses, it seems destined to be ignored unless we increase its attractiveness.

iancanton wrote:
nolefan5311 wrote:In the legend I think D.C. needs to list what regions assault it. As is, it looks like its just placed on top of the interstate, and not necessarily in the assault path. You might also make it border both Annapolis and Richmond.

dc currently borders baltimore and richmond. a further connection to annapolis is logical because of its proximity.

the road from annapolis to dc is still missing. adding it will give more ways to reach dc.

the bonuses for alaska and montana look as if they ought to be reduced to +2 and +3 respectively; although they sort of border each other, this is only a half-border, since it's thru a killer neutral.

wyoming can easily go from +3 bonus to +2 because all four cities are on interstates, which gives plenty of potential for the interstate +3 bonuses.

perhaps n4 instead of n5 is better for the state capitals, so that the capital bonus comes into play a bit earlier?

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
ask me2
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:50 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Texas

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by ask me2 »

The proportions are way off Texas and Alaska are way bigger than California.
User avatar
Nola_Lifer
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:46 pm
Location: 雪山
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by Nola_Lifer »

Pretty sure Louisiana is in the Southeast and not Southwest
Image
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

ask me2 wrote:The proportions are way off Texas and Alaska are way bigger than California.

Yes they are. If I had to do the map in proportions - within CC's size restrictions - it would look something like this:
[bigimg]http://gyazo.com/17005a9049ea54f931807a400baaeaed.png[/bigimg]
Nola_Lifer wrote:Pretty sure Louisiana is in the Southeast and not Southwest

That is somewhat correct, and Delaware is not part of the Great Lakes either. Things are out of proportion, in different regions for gameplay reasons, and also to adhere closely to the USA map packs.
User avatar
kmhebert
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:13 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Brimfield Massachusetts USA
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by kmhebert »

Hartford and Boston need airports.
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by AndyDufresne »

kmhebert wrote:Hartford and Boston need airports.

I think Isaiah just intends to keep it at 1 per bonus zone (save the West which has 2 special cases).


--Andy
User avatar
crazymilkshake5
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 3:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Georgia.

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by crazymilkshake5 »

looks as if MT is missing a territ from the original. Glendive which connects to parshall and Billings.

salem might need to connect with Burns (it does in the orginal.)
highscore
Image
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

AndyDufresne wrote:
kmhebert wrote:Hartford and Boston need airports.

I think Isaiah just intends to keep it at 1 per bonus zone (save the West which has 2 special cases).


--Andy

This is true. I used the largest airports in each region. It was a toss up as to which was the largest airport between Los Angeles and San Francisco, so I choose San Francisco for the cross map airport.
User avatar
sportsgod24
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:38 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by sportsgod24 »

You left the 16th biggest city in the country with a population of 750,000 off the map. Add Fort Worth or I cannot take it seriously.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

sportsgod24 wrote:You left the 16th biggest city in the country with a population of 750,000 off the map. Add Fort Worth or I cannot take it seriously.

How about I rename Dallas to DFW? Would that satisfy you?
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by AndyDufresne »

Thumbs up, do it.


--Andy
User avatar
The Bison King
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by The Bison King »

kind of surprised this is going to the forge. The graphics could be so much better. The states could at least be in the right shapes. Yada yada yada I know I've said it all before.
User avatar
cairnswk
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Australia

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by cairnswk »

The Bison King wrote:kind of surprised this is going to the forge...

i think this is still in gameplay isn't it? hasn't been stamped on front page for GP!
so graphic-wise, i know isaiah40 will do much better than this. :)
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
nolefan5311
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Gender: Male
Location: Florida

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by nolefan5311 »

cairnswk wrote:
The Bison King wrote:kind of surprised this is going to the forge...

i think this is still in gameplay isn't it? hasn't been stamped on front page for GP!
so graphic-wise, i know isaiah40 will do much better than this. :)


cairns is correct. This is currently stickied for the GP stamp.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

crazymilkshake5 wrote:looks as if MT is missing a territ from the original. Glendive which connects to parshall and Billings.
salem might need to connect with Burns (it does in the orginal.)

Glendive was remove per iancanton's suggestion, as for Salem to Burns, that connection is now Medford to Burns.
The Bison King wrote:kind of surprised this is going to the forge. The graphics could be so much better. The states could at least be in the right shapes. Yada yada yada I know I've said it all before.

Cairns and nolefan area correct, this is still in GP, and I know you've said it before, and as I have said before, if it doesn't pertain to gameplay clarity, it can wait until graphics.
User avatar
mr_chopper
Posts: 379
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:34 pm
Gender: Male
Location: near the Baskervilles in a barn

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by mr_chopper »

If it is alright, I will start a tourney with this map and gather info for you from the participants!

:)
nolefan5311
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Gender: Male
Location: Florida

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by nolefan5311 »

mr_chopper wrote:If it is alright, I will start a tourney with this map and gather info for you from the participants!

:)


Your tourney will not start for quite a while, as this still has some time to go before it will be released into Beta.
User avatar
charmir
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:43 am
Gender: Male

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by charmir »

nolefan5311 wrote:
mr_chopper wrote:If it is alright, I will start a tourney with this map and gather info for you from the participants!

:)


Your tourney will not start for quite a while, as this still has some time to go before it will be released into Beta.

Lets start it now. This is more than good enough for me.

But as for game play which the thing on the home page says you want, this looks OK to me. But one question, why does Hawaii only have one way in or out and Alaska have two? Hawaii has one extra region to take but it is only a +2 to a +4. Should these be a bit closes together. Maybe add another connection to Hawaii and both be +4 or just make Alaska a +3.
User avatar
Nola_Lifer
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:46 pm
Location: 雪山
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by Nola_Lifer »

I can't see the map still.
Image
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2487
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by ViperOverLord »

It's much harder to see the state lines than in earlier versions.
isaiah40
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by isaiah40 »

Nola_Lifer wrote:I can't see the map still.

Clear your cache and try again.
ViperOverLord wrote:It's much harder to see the state lines than in earlier versions.

I will be working on them while in graphics.

I think I got everything now! 8-[
[bigimg]http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/6168/megausav26small.png[/bigimg]
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [2 Aug 2012] V.25 Pg 24

Post by iancanton »

a progress report while i'm midway through checking bonuses. states that have a yellow airport appear to be undervalued by about 2 troops. my gut feel is that very large states, such as california, texas and florida, will be rarely attempted unless their bonuses are increased, simply because higher-paying combined bonuses, such as state plus highway, are available for the same number of cities held. more after i've completed my analysis of bonuses!

ian. :)
Image
User avatar
RjBeals
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: USA 2.1 [13 Aug 2012] V.265 Pg 25

Post by RjBeals »

any reason you chose green, yellow and blue for the colors? Wouldn't red/white/blue be more fitting?
Image
User avatar
iancanton
Foundry Foreman
Foundry Foreman
Posts: 2452
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:40 am
Location: europe

Re: USA 2.1 [13 Aug 2012] V.265 Pg 25

Post by iancanton »

what a good job u've made of the state bonuses! 90% of them are good as is, which is some achievement on a map of this size and complexity.

as mentioned before, the large states with yellow airports will need bigger bonuses to compensate for both their vulnerability to attack and the delay in actually starting to pay out: +9 instead of +6 for california, +8 instead of +5 for texas, +5 instead of +3 for illinois, +7 instead of +5 for new york and +6 instead of +5 for georgia.

the corner location of florida just about compensates for the large number of cities that it has, so we can leave it at +4. for dc, +2 auto-deploy instead of +3 is probably more balanced, since it's initially accessible only from baltimore and will almost certainly form part of a strategy that combines dc with i-95.

for the bonuses that involve state capitals, perhaps include the star symbol to make it clear that dc doesn't count.

the road from plattsburgh to burlington has somehow gone through canada. straighten out the border to fix this.

ian. :)
Image
Post Reply

Return to “The Atlas”