Page 15 of 22
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:56 pm
by TheForgivenOne
Victor Sullivan wrote:ender516 wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:TheForgivenOne wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:IT WAS JUST FOR COMIC EFFECT STOP OVER-ANAL-YZING, GOD!!!
Not possible.
I... uh... don't really know what to say to this...except post something on topic like, when is this gonna be heading to the "Archived Implemented Suggestions" to be put on the *To Do* list?
I think Submitted Suggestions is the closest thing we have to a To Do List any more. The Archived Implemented Suggestions are the ones that have been
done.
Yet there are ones that say *To Do* and others that don't but have yet to be done...
It was already made clear in "How Suggestions Works" That the *To do* list was being thrown out. I think it would just be a waste of time to go through suggestions as a whole to find every suggestion on the To do list and remove it from the title
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:54 pm
by Pirlo
12 players thing sucks
I'll play it a lot though
it would be tough to find 5 decent players to team up
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:39 pm
by ender516
Pirlo wrote:12 players thing sucks
I'll play it a lot though
it would be tough to find 5 decent players to team up
The nice thing about twelve is you can have 3 teams of 4 or 4 teams of 3 (or even 6 pairs).
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:49 pm
by Victor Sullivan
ender516 wrote:Pirlo wrote:12 players thing sucks
I'll play it a lot though
it would be tough to find 5 decent players to team up
The nice thing about twelve is you can have 3 teams of 4 or 4 teams of 3 (or even 6 pairs).
And quin- and sex-tuples!
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:25 pm
by Pirlo
oh cool... i already voted 12.. can I vote again?
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:52 pm
by Victor Sullivan
Think we can implement this for the 10,000,000th game?
5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:45 am
by Blitzaholic
5 vs 5 gamesIf this has been suggested, I apologize, I scrolled thru the pages and found nothing.Concise description:- we have singles, dubs, trips, quads, now we need 5 vs 5 games.
Specifics/Details:- When adding 5 vs 5, we would also need to add 2 colors: purple and brown maybe?
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:- There are some large maps out there where 5 vs 5 would be great on, adds more team unity and could be great for clans and clan activity.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:53 am
by BoganGod
Could be a lot of fun, how hard would the coding be? If it is possible, would love to see this happen
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:23 am
by Joodoo
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:40 am
by Blitzaholic
I'd love to see up to 12 players, at least 10, but, 12 is great and the poll seems to support that. So, there would be a 5 vs 5 options and 6 vs 6, and even 4 vs 4 vs 4.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:17 am
by hiddendragon
I didn't open a topic but I did suggest a couple of years ago that 5v5 games be implemented.
Dubs, trips, quads, now fists
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:27 am
by Natascha
Blitzaholic wrote:I'd love to see up to 12 players, at least 10, but, 12 is great and the poll seems to support that. So, there would be a 5 vs 5 options and 6 vs 6, and even 4 vs 4 vs 4.
I already get lost in 8p games quads.... lol
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:40 am
by Qwert
i think that these is cover with joodo sugestion,because if these sugestion be implemented(increase to 12 player),then your sugestion will be no need. I think that even now these can be merged to these topic.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:42 am
by Mageplunka69
i think this would be a great thing as well, i would love to see this for bigger maps
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:02 pm
by MyTurnToWin
Fantastic idea. When we play quads then I have to decide which of the five of us doesn't get to play!!! On larger maps this would really increase the challenge, strategy and fun.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:16 pm
by firth4eva
Would ruin smaller maps. I vote no
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 1:00 pm
by Gold Knight
firth4eva wrote:Would ruin smaller maps. I vote no
Kinda agree with this, especially with the random map choice. If they were able to code the random map choices to choose from small, medium, and large maps, then I would give this my full support.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:11 pm
by hwhrhett
Gold Knight wrote:
Kinda agree with this, especially with the random map choice. If they were able to code the random map choices to choose from small, medium, and large maps, then I would give this my full support.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 5:32 pm
by reptile
Gold Knight wrote:firth4eva wrote:Would ruin smaller maps. I vote no
Kinda agree with this, especially with the random map choice. If they were able to code the random map choices to choose from small, medium, and large maps, then I would give this my full support.
I agree with no... It would be good for clan battles, but lets not kid ourselves. This is just a setting that farmers would love to see. Lets keep Conquer Club as competitive as we can. 5v5 imo is not a good option. We have plenty to choose from already, we dont need 5v5. I agree that 4v4 is a great inclusion (though farmers are just waiting to scare away all those new recruits that get chased away from the game already because of it). And do not kid yourselves, this does happen, i know people personally. I hate farming and farmers, and this is a game that will show new CC scores of 10,000 + which is impossible to get to now... (with the exception of 100% farming games). It would take a lot of competition out of the game. The only benefit would be clan games but that is it. It is not worth it. If you include 5v5, next comes 6v6 etc...
If this is put up to lack for serious consideration then i think there needs to be a minimum point requirement. Something like 1500 at least! I already think this should be implemented in 4v4 games. I should start a thread to see what other people think about 1500 point minimum to be able to play quads, i think it would pass depending on what lack thought about it.
I am very interested already to what lack has to say about this.
Sorry blitz, i dont think this is a good idea at all. Clan battles and 1500+ (or even 2000) point players maybe, but beyond that it is just farming. I dont have any respect for people that just farm for score... it takes no skill and is pathetic imo. CC should be fun for EVERYONE, not scare them away.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:13 pm
by Qwert
reptile,i must say that i agree with you-i look blitz games,and he play quads with inexperience players to pump hes score, and i hope that one day will put some blocade that these stop.
Just look on last 30 games on woodboro-i dont understand how its possible that hes opponent are cooks-privates corporal-in all games? how can these be possibile-coincidence or something else? Ofcourse that he want 5vs5,because get chance to grab more easy points, nothing else.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:19 pm
by reptile
Well i know blitz is a skilled player (he's got my #
) so i wasn't talking about him in particular. i am just saying overall.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:22 pm
by Qwert
yes,its skilled player,but these is not good way to show hes skill, killing cooks,privates and cadets in maps who they not understand.
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:41 pm
by ChewyBlu3y
5 v 5 sounds like a great idea, espeically for clan wars. Except the one thing is the size of the map, what happens if it's doodle earth, how would things such as having one territory work out, or classic where you might end up with 3 or 2 territories.
Re: Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitte
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:29 pm
by Pirlo
hey.... you can spare 5v5 or 6v6 for the big maps
you don't have to always play it 12 or even 10 players
Re: 5 vs 5
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2010 11:53 pm
by Pirlo
qwert wrote:reptile,i must say that i agree with you-i look blitz games,and he play quads with inexperience players to pump hes score, and i hope that one day will put some blocade that these stop.
Just look on last 30 games on woodboro-i dont understand how its possible that hes opponent are cooks-privates corporal-in all games? how can these be possibile-coincidence or something else? Ofcourse that he want 5vs5,because get chance to grab more easy points, nothing else.
lol man...... these games are open for all.....
experts can join them..... he doesn't mind you gathering a good squad and challenge him
if you think this way will give you more points, feel free to use it
