Conquer Club

nope, Although after a confusing day one and two, I have now learned that I have been town the whole time, despite being let to believe I was scum, which is nice. Did anyone read my bit on wercool?

captainwalrus wrote:nope, Although after a confusing day one and two, I have now learned that I have been town the whole time, despite being let to believe I was scum, which is nice. Did anyone read my bit on wercool?

So you're basically saying wercool is submarining and not making strong stances. I have no other leads right now. I'm willing to apply some pressure.

vote wercool

With the deadline looming, I'm going to have to vote wercool.

vote wercool

I want to point out that after my comment about LSU he went back to submarining. I think he got caught and would be a good person to investigate tonight.

how do i defend agaist a submarining, mabey by saing im not

wercool wrote:how do i defend agaist a submarining, mabey by saing im not

you defend against it by posting and being active.

Aog is a good example of what happens when you don't read your role pm properly.
I don't find the wercool case very conclusive, but we don't have much else and a bit low activity. Might as well.
Vote Wercool

I have been observing but have not posted. I'm pretty sure that, even if it could be suspicious, this doesn't make me positively guilty, does it?

I am suspicious of wercool now, but don't want anyone to come in and hammer him after me. For now, I'll unvote, but wercool needs to make a better defense than "I'm not submarining."

Wolverine Mutant wrote:I have been observing but have not posted. I'm pretty sure that, even if it could be suspicious, this doesn't make me positively guilty, does it?

Again, with the wercool case, simply observing can be misconstrued as submarining. Even if you don't really have anything to accuse anyone about, posting about someone who may be submarining is a good way to stay active. Especially in a relatively large game such as this one.

UTAlan wrote:I am suspicious of wercool now, but don't want anyone to come in and hammer him after me. For now, I'll unvote, but wercool needs to make a better defense than "I'm not submarining."

I agree. I think L-2 is the safe number here to force the claim and not risk anyone hammering too soon.

While that's true, there's no way to know whether the person doing so is simply pointing out someone else's lack of activity to take the attention off of their own lack of activity, because that person is in fact mafia and is submarining.

vote count

wercool(5) CW, safariguy, cubfan, RE, ga7
with 13 alive it will take 7 to lynch wercool is at L-2

not voting
Wercool
/
strike wolf
LSU Tiger Josh
UTAlan
duday53
Metsfanmax
Wolverine Mutant

If nothing happens between now and morning, I'm gonna have to v-te Wercool...

Can you give us a specific time Friday when you plan to end the day?

that would depend upon how you all are doing discussing the game how active people are but in general probably sometime in the after noon

safariguy5 wrote:

Wolverine Mutant wrote:I have been observing but have not posted. I'm pretty sure that, even if it could be suspicious, this doesn't make me positively guilty, does it?

Again, with the wercool case, simply observing can be misconstrued as submarining. Even if you don't really have anything to accuse anyone about, posting about someone who may be submarining is a good way to stay active. Especially in a relatively large game such as this one.

That's a good point, I hadn't even thought of that. It seems that everyone knows what to do here but me..

No word from wercool and no more suspects popping up. I hope this doesn't come back to haunt me, but I don't want to sit by and do nothing.

Vote wercool

still reading, still not sub-ing. should i claim?

wercool wrote:still reading, still not sub-ing. should i claim?

I would you are at L-1

You're at L-1, so probably.

im a doc

wercool wrote:im a doc

specifics?

Rainbow Eater wrote:

wercool wrote:im a doc

specifics?

a claim this vague in your current position will not get you anywhere but dead.

Rainbow Eater wrote:

Rainbow Eater wrote:

wercool wrote:im a doc

specifics?

a claim this vague in your current position will not get you anywhere but dead.

You need to claim more than just a doc. Tell us specifics, like who you used your night action on? Everyone should be ready to verify his claim by the way. We are running out of time?