Conquer Club

5454

We need a one day challenge to make this more fun. We can use Eastern Standard time. Guesses in by 6:00 pm. I'll end it around Noon the next day. If your within three up or down 1 point. If you nail it then 10 points.

Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

looks like the 100-1000 group is holding pretty strong.

5434 today

1 week ago it was 5512, so 78 in 7 days.

Need open letter from BigWham

HitRed wrote:5434 today

1 week ago it was 5512, so 78 in 7 days.

Need open letter from BigWham

Newly revised timeline for CC demise is t-minus 494 days

HitRed wrote:5434 today

1 week ago it was 5512, so 78 in 7 days.

Need open letter from BigWham

LOLOLOLOL

You are kidding right?

His idea of improvement is to push you into his other sites like conquer forces.

This took a ton of time to develop, and basically has 4 people that plays it including BW. It has been out more than a year and is a huge flop.

Just think how much he could have updated and improved CC instead.

King_Herpes wrote:Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

I think you missed callouts by a few forum areas there champ

IcePack wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

I think you missed callouts by a few forum areas there champ

Just trying to be friendly, bubb.

I forgot that you were in a bad mood still.

King_Herpes wrote:

IcePack wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

I think you missed callouts by a few forum areas there champ

Just trying to be friendly, bubb.

I forgot that you were in a butthurt mood still.

*fixed

riskllama wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:

IcePack wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

I think you missed callouts by a few forum areas there champ

Just trying to be friendly, bubb.

I forgot that you were in a butthurt mood still.

*fixed

Still butthurt I didn’t take you off foe eh? Poor llama.

Another Kodak moment brought to you by forgiveness.

IcePack wrote:

riskllama wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:

IcePack wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Care for a 1vs1 game, Ice?

Your map and settings are fine, Goose.

I think you missed callouts by a few forum areas there champ

Just trying to be friendly, bubb.

I forgot that you were in a butthurt mood still.

*fixed

Still butthurt I didn’t take you off foe eh? Poor llama.

very much so, yes/indeed.

No foeing anymore. Players are valuable.

HitRed wrote:No foeing anymore. Players are valuable.

we're both still here, HR - IP can foe whomever he chooses.

riskllama wrote:

HitRed wrote:No foeing anymore. Players are valuable.

we're both still here, HR - IP can foe whomever he chooses.

You know what I'm saying also.

Times are changing.

HitRed wrote:

riskllama wrote:

HitRed wrote:No foeing anymore. Players are valuable.

we're both still here, HR - IP can foe whomever he chooses.

You know what I'm saying also.

Times are changing.

I would like everyones foe list to be publicly available from their wall. I would fin this interesting

Maybe a simple change like calling "foeing" "fearing" instead might help, just as an opening idea for an improvement. I doubt many of the folks who have foes at the moment use the "foeing" function to confront their "foes"- most use it to avoid contact with them altogether.

We are down to 5,425. The foe button, even well intended, will hasten our already deep decline. Nothing is so infuriating than seeing a great game with lots of great players and your blocked by a someone you only played one game against, EVER....and there were no complaints during the game!

HitRed wrote:We are down to 5,425. The foe button, even well intended, will hasten our already deep decline. Nothing is so infuriating than seeing a great game with lots of great players and your blocked by a someone you only played one game against, EVER....and there were no complaints during the game!

your theory on removing the foe feature = CC salvation is ludicrous, HR. if anything, foeing keeps people around as it enables them to block out anyone they deem undesirable and carry on with their CC experience. what is your fascination with this crusade???

That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....

Symmetry wrote:That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....

I get it, machoism would make most avoid it.

HitRed wrote:

Symmetry wrote:That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....

I get it, machoism would make most avoid it.

Exactly. Consider "fearing" more as a placeholder. Someone will come up with a better way of phrasing it.

lol - it's like you two are in a burning building, deciding what type of footwear is appropriate to put on to go outside in. carry on, i guess...

riskllama wrote:lol - it's like you two are in a burning building, deciding what type of footwear is appropriate to put on to go outside in. carry on, i guess...

RL- you don't have to burn down every suggestion.