Re: OFFICIAL ELECTION THREAD
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:58 pm
shhshhshh...hush now, saxi - we'll see you in 4 years.
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?t=234754
riskllama wrote:shhshhshh...hush now, saxi - we'll see you in 4 years.
Your statement is so convoluted...if it was meant to be funny the humor was lost.DoomYoshi wrote:Media keeps saying there is no evidence of voter fraud. Yet people voting for Biden is, by definition, fraud. Because they mean one thing (Trump) but then they put something else in writing.
Supreme Court of the United States wrote:The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892), that the State legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by State legislatures in several States for many years after the Framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28—33.
The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 (“[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated”) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess.).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html
saxitoxin wrote:Supreme Court of the United States wrote:The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892), that the State legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by State legislatures in several States for many years after the Framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28—33.
The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 (“[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated”) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Cong., 1st Sess.).
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html
Fixed, yes.mookiemcgee wrote:These people are protesting for democracy?

Why stop there? Why not 2056?saxitoxin wrote:Fixed, yes.mookiemcgee wrote:These people are protesting for democracy?
Donald Trump is the democratically elected president of the United States until January 20, 2025.
Actually he just passed them on his way to play golf.saxitoxin wrote:Two hours before the start of today's MAGA March in DC, the president drove out to inspect the thousands of his supporters who had already congregated pledging to defend his second term. Nearly 100 other protests are scheduled across the country today!
We will meet the Biden-Harris campaign's outstretched hands, pleading for unity ... and we will cut them off.
Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Themsaxitoxin wrote:Fixed, yes.mookiemcgee wrote:These people are protesting for democracy?
Donald Trump is the democratically elected president of the United States until January 20, 2025.
Ok, perhaps it is the wrong word. What is the legal term for when you lie on a document?jimboston wrote:Your statement is so convoluted...if it was meant to be funny the humor was lost.DoomYoshi wrote:Media keeps saying there is no evidence of voter fraud. Yet people voting for Biden is, by definition, fraud. Because they mean one thing (Trump) but then they put something else in writing.
If you lie by mail it’s mail-fraud or postal fraud.DoomYoshi wrote:Ok, perhaps it is the wrong word. What is the legal term for when you lie on a document?jimboston wrote:Your statement is so convoluted...if it was meant to be funny the humor was lost.DoomYoshi wrote:Media keeps saying there is no evidence of voter fraud. Yet people voting for Biden is, by definition, fraud. Because they mean one thing (Trump) but then they put something else in writing.
Point?HitRed wrote:Arizona calling?
Jdsizzleslice wrote:BTW, CNN is up for sale. Wouldn't it be something if Trump purchased CNN...

I'm hoping Sinclair Broadcasting buys CNN. The Sinclair family are big Trump supporters. I can see a Sinclair-owned CNN producing wall-to-wall coverage of Biden scandals (real or imagined) from now until the midterms, in the same way CNN did with Trump.Jdsizzleslice wrote:BTW, CNN is up for sale. Wouldn't it be something if Trump purchased CNN...
speaking as a right-wing douchebag myself, I agreeriskllama wrote:Sinclair = right wing douchebags
McEntee is not just firing people. The Pentagon general counsel this week hired former Republican operative and political appointee Michael Ellis as general counsel of the National Security Agency, making him a civilian member of the senior executive service. That gives Ellis civil service protections that will make it hard for Biden’s team to push him out. Several officials said McEntee also wants to help campaign allies secure jobs in the White House.
Some officials said they worry the new hires could destroy briefing documents prepared for the incoming Biden administration. Others criticized McEntee’s choices for key government roles.
The post-election firings are the culmination of a months-long crusade by McEntee, who reports directly to the president and sits just outside the Oval Office.
Since the election, the pace of removals seems to have accelerated. Some of the removals appear to create opportunities for policy gains in the waning days of the Trump administration.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
Did you read any of these?saxitoxin wrote:62 affidavits, sworn and notarized under penalty of perjury, by official observers documenting ballot rigging and other misdeeds they witnessed in Michigan; a chilling read for those who care about democracy - a jubilant chronicle for those who care only about empowering elderly Joe Biden like jimboston -
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/tr ... ageNum=138
He can’t afford it.Jdsizzleslice wrote:BTW, CNN is up for sale. Wouldn't it be something if Trump purchased CNN...
Fortunately for us all, if China did buy CNN, the US Government would immediately seize all of the assets.jimboston wrote:He can’t afford it.Jdsizzleslice wrote:BTW, CNN is up for sale. Wouldn't it be something if Trump purchased CNN...
Maybe China will by it for him?