Greenland [Quenched]

[Dr.Winnerman]

I like this map
It has teh madest Wifi

[AndyDufresne]

Any additional thoughts? I'm assuming your last post, Killing, links to the final images and XML?


--Andy

[LED ZEPPELINER]

Any additional thoughts? I'm assuming your last post, Killing, links to the final images and XML?


--Andy

*crickets* *crickets* i say quench it now, so we can play later

[the.killing.44]

Yeah you got it Andy … final links post:
viewtopic.php?f=64&t=78391&start=285#p2017903

.44

[LED ZEPPELINER]

so lets get this baby out on the road, i can't wait to play

[sailorseal]

When I say QUENCH

You say IT

[AndyDufresne]

Beta - Quenching

---The Final Forge period has concluded for the Greenland Map. All objections have had their time. The Foundry and I hereby brand this map with the Foundry Brand. Let it be known that this map is now ready for BETA Play. After an extended period of time in BETA and once all quirks and issues have been resolved, the map will be put into Full Play (barring any Lack vetoes).

Conquer Club, enjoy!

--Andy

[AndyDufresne]

Map Medals will be given out once the map is removed from BETA.


--Andy

[the.killing.44]

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you to everyone who contributed to the thread, and esp. mibi & gim !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

.44

[sailorseal]

Nice job!

[LED ZEPPELINER]

Hurraahhh


FINALLY


YAY

[RjBeals]

beautiful map - congrats !

[thenobodies80]

A rematch is needed, this time on your map....

Good work friend

P.s. Your map is on the Italian forum, as usual

[saaimen]

Congratulations

[Bruceswar]

I got all excited ... then I see it is not up for play yet

[LED ZEPPELINER]

I got all excited ... then I see it is not up for play yet

me too

[SultanOfSurreal]

congrats, I've watched this map all the way from new drafts/projects and it is great to see it quenched.

now hopefully we don't have to wait a month and a half like with oceania....

[sailorseal]

Just noticed, Andy was in perfect timing with my post

[Bruceswar]

This map needs to be fixed for 1 vs 1 games. So many unneeded neutrals. Can something be done?

[LED ZEPPELINER]

This map needs to be fixed for 1 vs 1 games. So many unneeded neutrals. Can something be done?

but the great thing about 4 player games is that every territory is filled, and the only neutrals are the ones on the attack route

[Bruceswar]

This map needs to be fixed for 1 vs 1 games. So many unneeded neutrals. Can something be done?

but the great thing about 4 player games is that every territory is filled, and the only neutrals are the ones on the attack route

Yes it is nice... for that.. doubles, or a 4 way.. but can't something be done about the 1 vs 1 neutrals?

[Dublanous1]

I really can't wait to see this come out playable.

[the.killing.44]

I really can't wait to see this come out playable.

Already playable

This map needs to be fixed for 1 vs 1 games. So many unneeded neutrals. Can something be done?

Well in 1v1 games it's split three ways, so instead of splitting the 33÷2 R1 (neutral), it has to be 33÷3 no R, so it's 11 starting terts for p1, p2, and np.

.44

[iancanton]

according to the opening post, there are only 32 starting regions plus 3 neutral regions. this means each player starts with 10 regions in 1v1, with 12+3 neutral. i suggest that we code peary land as start positions, so that each player will start with 1+10=11 regions, with 10+3 neutral. this is not a huge reduction in neutrals, but is a step in the right direction and also has the beneficial side-effect of cutting from 5% to less than 1.5% the chance of player 1 starting with a +2 or +3 bonus in 1v1.

ian.

[the.killing.44]

Sounds good to me

http://h1.ripway.com/killing44/GreenX.xml

.44