Conquer Club

I don't mind the spam. Just make night shorter.

meh I like nagerous anyway so Im not bothered replacing you

enjoy being lonelyon my blacklist.

Nope not even NES is there

vote rictus
reason>>>>>>freezie

FiveThreeEight wrote:I don't mind the spam. Just make night shorter.

It was 2 days

oh and nagerous has officialy replaced freezie

prod some people please

freezie wrote:Alright, so there is a day killer? Otherwise, how a daytime bomb would ever be of use?

i believe a daytime bomb kills the person who hammers them.

This is a dumb bandwagon - I'm glad we nailed scum on day 1, but hammering without allowing for a roleclaim is bad play, period. Freezie, you of all people should know this, so this blatant stirring (from someone who's leaving particularly) makes me suspicious. There's nothing suspicious about my decision not to want to kill off anyone on day 1 without a claim.

I'm far more suspicious now of anyone who didn't vote for the dead person, as they're more likely to be scum IMO...

Dead person being McSnipe?

If you lot make a list of who you want prodded Ill prod them

cena-rules wrote:If you lot make a list of who you want prodded Ill prod them

No need to prod me... that is for sure... let rictus claim before we rain the anvils upon his head.

How about Talapus (who I don't think has even posted), and Iliad.

prodded

Wow, half this game so far is complete spam. Instead of just filling up this thread with random useless crap, learn to use the chatroom. Anyway, after rereading everything, I fully agree with Freezie's logic. Rictus is so far our best bet. Wether he's just a noob who doesn't know better, or really bad at covering his tracks, his actions are suspicious. So, Vote - - - Rictus

NESconqueror wrote:vote count

NES-3-mcsnipe -Iliad-Talapus
lv-1-boro-
Mcsnipe-9-freezie-NES-rictus- AD-538- lord voldemort- f1fth-MTG-two
538-1 - lsu
Rictus-1-mib-
fir-1-fir-

17 alive so 9 to lynch
Apologies about that... We got a lynch then! (now to wait for mod)

That looks like the vote count from the last day.

vote count
rictus-538,Do5,talapus=3

No needto prod, I was out of the house for most of the day. And I read through what has happened, and freezie has an excellent point.

vote rictus

Rictus wrote:This is a dumb bandwagon - I'm glad we nailed scum on day 1, but hammering without allowing for a roleclaim is bad play, period. Freezie, you of all people should know this, so this blatant stirring (from someone who's leaving particularly) makes me suspicious. There's nothing suspicious about my decision not to want to kill off anyone on day 1 without a claim.

I'm far more suspicious now of anyone who didn't vote for the dead person, as they're more likely to be scum IMO...

Bandwagon, eh? Freezie made a very solid point about your actions, so throwing around words like that help nothing mate.

I can understand wanting to wait for a role claim, but looking back - as McSnipe was scum and his actions were very suspicious - it was the right decision. McSnipe of course would have lied, just confusing the matter.

Now I'd like you to note the coincidence of Borox's death and your reprimand. It's not absolutely conclusive evidence, but in mafia, it hardly ever is. So: Vote Rictus

F1fth wrote:

Rictus wrote:This is a dumb bandwagon - I'm glad we nailed scum on day 1, but hammering without allowing for a roleclaim is bad play, period. Freezie, you of all people should know this, so this blatant stirring (from someone who's leaving particularly) makes me suspicious. There's nothing suspicious about my decision not to want to kill off anyone on day 1 without a claim.

I'm far more suspicious now of anyone who didn't vote for the dead person, as they're more likely to be scum IMO...

Bandwagon, eh? Freezie made a very solid point about your actions, so throwing around words like that help nothing mate.

I can understand wanting to wait for a role claim, but looking back - as McSnipe was scum and his actions were very suspicious - it was the right decision. McSnipe of course would have lied, just confusing the matter.

Now I'd like you to note the coincidence of Borox's death and your reprimand. It's not absolutely conclusive evidence, but in mafia, it hardly ever is. So: Vote Rictus

Suspicious? I just said NES was a n00b.

confirm

McSnipe wrote:

F1fth wrote:

Rictus wrote:This is a dumb bandwagon - I'm glad we nailed scum on day 1, but hammering without allowing for a roleclaim is bad play, period. Freezie, you of all people should know this, so this blatant stirring (from someone who's leaving particularly) makes me suspicious. There's nothing suspicious about my decision not to want to kill off anyone on day 1 without a claim.

I'm far more suspicious now of anyone who didn't vote for the dead person, as they're more likely to be scum IMO...

Bandwagon, eh? Freezie made a very solid point about your actions, so throwing around words like that help nothing mate.

I can understand wanting to wait for a role claim, but looking back - as McSnipe was scum and his actions were very suspicious - it was the right decision. McSnipe of course would have lied, just confusing the matter.

Now I'd like you to note the coincidence of Borox's death and your reprimand. It's not absolutely conclusive evidence, but in mafia, it hardly ever is. So: Vote Rictus

Suspicious? I just said NES was a n00b.

Showing a desire to kill anybody beyond randomness on day 1 is suspicious, even if it's NES.

sorry, I wasn't here all of today, (I had to clean my room before I could get back on )

vote count
rictus-5-538,Do5,talapus,MTG,F1fth

F1fth wrote:

McSnipe wrote:

F1fth wrote:

Rictus wrote:This is a dumb bandwagon - I'm glad we nailed scum on day 1, but hammering without allowing for a roleclaim is bad play, period. Freezie, you of all people should know this, so this blatant stirring (from someone who's leaving particularly) makes me suspicious. There's nothing suspicious about my decision not to want to kill off anyone on day 1 without a claim.

I'm far more suspicious now of anyone who didn't vote for the dead person, as they're more likely to be scum IMO...

Bandwagon, eh? Freezie made a very solid point about your actions, so throwing around words like that help nothing mate.

I can understand wanting to wait for a role claim, but looking back - as McSnipe was scum and his actions were very suspicious - it was the right decision. McSnipe of course would have lied, just confusing the matter.

Now I'd like you to note the coincidence of Borox's death and your reprimand. It's not absolutely conclusive evidence, but in mafia, it hardly ever is. So: Vote Rictus

Suspicious? I just said NES was a n00b.

Showing a desire to kill anybody beyond randomness on day 1 is suspicious, even if it's NES.

vote rictus

Freezie starts the bandwagon and then quits???

HAHAHAHAHA


YOU ARE ALL SHEEP!

And, on that note,
Vote: Rictus

Anarkistsdream wrote:Freezie starts the bandwagon and then quits???

HAHAHAHAHA


YOU ARE ALL SHEEP!

And, on that note,
Vote: Rictus

either that or mostly sheep with a few very well disguised wolves mixed in