Page 13 of 22
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:29 pm
by xtratabasco
soundout9 wrote:Ive watched about half of that so far and well i gotta give it to you it has some convencing things. im starting to not be so sure about the pentagon. The pentagon deff does look fishy. but the other things about the world trade centers i still belive the gov and the discovery channel.
well thanks for your honesty. Im not 100% sure either, just trying to get to the bottom of it.
hope you have the time to finish it and reply when your done.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:39 pm
by muy_thaiguy
I just watched a conspiracy video that
actually used a Wiley Coyote cartoon to "prove" that no jet hit the pentagon!
Here it is.
The video
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:42 pm
by xtratabasco
the only conspircy going on is the one done by this government.
PNAC (the neo-cons) choose to go to war before 911 and said they couldnt do it because the people of the US wouldnt go for it unless we had a Pearl Harbor type event.....
well thats exactly what happened.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:43 pm
by Backglass
All I gotta say after all this xtratabasco is that you must live a very angry, paranoid life.
I hope you get some help some day and quit looking in the bushes for big brother.
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:46 pm
by soundout9
xtratabasco wrote:soundout9 wrote:Ive watched about half of that so far and well i gotta give it to you it has some convencing things. im starting to not be so sure about the pentagon. The pentagon deff does look fishy. but the other things about the world trade centers i still belive the gov and the discovery channel.
well thanks for your honesty. Im not 100% sure either, just trying to get to the bottom of it.
hope you have the time to finish it and reply when your done.
Im working on it
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:48 pm
by soundout9
Backglass wrote:All I gotta say after all this xtratabasco is that you must live a very angry, paranoid life.
I hope you get some help some day and quit looking in the bushes for big brother.
This aint flame wars.......
and watch it its got some evidence i dont belive all of it but some of it hits some interesting points...and im still not done watching it
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:17 pm
by soundout9
All right i finished the movie i need to think abou this. Kinda hard to think w/ your gf on the phone. tell ya what i think tommarow
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:31 pm
by Backglass
soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence
No, it has no evidence at all. It has rumor, innuendo, speculation & doubt. Sometimes the truth is hard to swallow.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 12:32 am
by xtratabasco
Backglass wrote:soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence
No, it has no evidence at all. It has rumor, innuendo, speculation & doubt. Sometimes the truth is hard to swallow.
yeah thats why "your proof" cannot be viewed.
go get you some money backglass
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:52 pm
by xtratabasco
backglass this link
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=1 for some reason they pulled down the other link, this video shows 10 times more pictures than you showed. It even shows pictures this government took inside the rings of the pentagon, but like yours there is no pictures of the 757.
go figure.
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:58 pm
by Bavarian Raven
...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:38 am
by xtratabasco
Backglass wrote:soundout9 wrote:and watch it its got some evidence
No, it has no evidence at all.
kind of like the pentagon, no evidence of a 757
but lets not just take my word for it, let Major Douglas Rokke explain
Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project. 30-year Army career.
Article 8/19/05: Regarding the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001 "When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile."
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
next
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:47 pm
by Backglass
XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:03 pm
by xtratabasco
Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:
Rob Balsamo – Commercial airline pilot. Co-founder, Pilots for 9/11 Truth. 4,000+ total hours flown.
Statement to this website 7/23/07: "In May 2006, I was watching Glenn Beck’s show on CNN. The Department of Defense had just released the infamous "5 frames" of stop-action video of the pentagon attack. Beck showed the frames and commented, "You can see a 757 in 10 seconds flat! Either that or a naked Michael Moore heading for the buffet! This should put all those conspiracy theories to rest". While watching it, I'm thinking to myself, "I can’t see any 757.” And I'm asking myself, “Are there still unresolved questions regarding 9/11?"
So I started poking around on the Internet trying to find anything I can to back up the government’s story because I didn't want to believe our government might have had something to do with 9/11.
Early on, I came across Operation Northwoods. It blew me away that elements of our government had seriously planned acts of terrorism inside the United States to justify invading Cuba. Consider that 9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean had said, "The greatest failure of 9/11 was lack of imagination", yet just under 40 years prior, elements of our own government imagined perpetrating such an event!
In late summer of 2006, I co-founded the group Pilots for 9/11 Truth, to more formally conduct research on the aviation-related aspects of 9/11. In August 2006, Pilots for 9/11 Truth received from the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) a copy of the Flight Data Recorder data of Flight 77, which, according to the official account, hit the Pentagon.
We analyzed the data and announced our conclusion on 3/26/07 that "The information provided by the NTSB does not support the 9/11 Commission Report of American Airlines Flight 77 impact with the Pentagon." Much more information about this can be found in our video documentary and our press release.
So now, a year after I began looking into the events of 9/11 and having devoted a lot of time and effort researching those events, I'm frustrated because we haven't been able to find anything to confirm the government's story. And what's worse is that the FBI and NTSB refuse to even discuss with us the many obvious problems we found in the Flight 77 Flight Data Recorder.
I continue to work with my colleagues at Pilots for 9/11 Truth, to grow the organization and to continue our research into the aviation-related aspects of 9/11, looking for confirmation of the government’s story."
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:08 pm
by Backglass
Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:39 am
by Dancing Mustard
Backglass wrote:Backglass wrote:XTRA in his Tin Foil Hat:
Tee Hee
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:10 am
by Snorri1234
Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:13 am
by s.xkitten
Snorri1234 wrote:Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
seems?
no no, they really are comprised of idiots.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:15 am
by Snorri1234
s.xkitten wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
seems?
no no, they really are comprised of idiots.
But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:16 am
by s.xkitten
Snorri1234 wrote:s.xkitten wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
seems?
no no, they really are comprised of idiots.
But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!
you can't act that stupid
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:25 pm
by xtratabasco
s.xkitten wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:s.xkitten wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Bavarian Raven wrote:...well if they did cover it up, they are doing a better job of it then they are of saying they are "winning the war on oil" in the middle east
I think this is the best argument against these conspiracies. The government seems to be compromised of idiots!
seems?
no no, they really are comprised of idiots.
But maybe that is part of the conspiracy too?
Maybe GW Bush is actually a genius, but he acts like an idiot to trick us!
you can't act that stupid
true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing.
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:28 pm
by heavycola
xtratabasco wrote:backglass this link
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... &plindex=1 for some reason they pulled down the other link, this video shows 10 times more pictures than you showed. It even shows pictures this government took inside the rings of the pentagon, but like yours there is no pictures of the 757.
go figure.
Memo to all shadowy ubergovernment figures/al qaeda teenagers armed with nothing more than a bubble machine and some juicy fruit gum:
Please drive a 757 into this thread. Make the idiocy stop. I would suggest flying it into xtratabasco's head, but fear this would have no effect bar another thread claiming it never happened.
K tks
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:29 pm
by vtmarik
xtratabasco wrote:true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing.
Neither do we have any physical evidence that it was a drone or a missile.
Unless you have photos of drone parts...
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:32 pm
by Guiscard
heavycola wrote:Please drive a 757 into this thread. Make the idiocy stop. I would suggest flying it into xtratabasco's head, but fear this would have no effect bar another thread claiming it never happened.
K tks
No. They'll be fine to fly a plane into his head as long as they make sure he collapses sideways (as anyone who knows anything knows is the result of a 747 hitting the side of the head knows is the case) rather than collapsing straight down (which, as everyone must realise, is a ridiculous way to fall if hit in the head by a 747, and if it were to happen we would be forced to conclude that the 747 didn't exist and the collapse was due to dynamite in the shoes).
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:32 pm
by xtratabasco
vtmarik wrote:xtratabasco wrote:true, but we still dont have any evidence of a 757 hitting the pentagon or vaporizing.
Neither do we have any physical evidence that it was a drone or a missile.
Unless you have photos of drone parts...
I do, and it was in the many links provided.