Conquer Club

Ragian wrote:Rereading in order to make up my mind, having been posting without much merit mainly due to connection issues (I have to use my mobile wifi in order to get to CC as my dumbass router blocks it for...reasons I'm too thick to get). So, here's me trying to make sense of what's going on. I'm doing this chronologically in sort of note form...

homer_jay wrote:

SoN!c wrote:Loose stated that the resort is legit. But playing a poker game in the boiler room? That sounds "off grid resort" dodgy.. So with 13 players in a legit resort i guess the scum is to be found at that shady poker table? Who else has the same idea?

are the poker players also supposed to be guessing 5 players at the table in order to win the goodie bag? because if so, that means it's not typical "mafia" in that they don't know each other? but then that raises questions on how night kills work as a collective.

guess i'm a little confused

Homer's comment sounds like a big, "don't look here!" That raises an eyebrow.

SoN!c wrote:[
Charle ticking all boxes on a scum Charle version sofar/quote]

SoN!c wrote:FP by Charle who just unticked one of his boxes

Care to share some boxes for the benefit of town?

TrafalgarLaw01 wrote: I actually think that at leasst one Scum is at the table. but ofc I have nothing to back that up. But yeah town power roles might be at the table as well.

Why do you think this?

homer_jay wrote:there are two options for the table.

if it is a situation where it's a shady game, then maybe certain roles were selected for the table, and those randomly assigned those roles are there.. which would likely be a mix of scum and certain power roles (vigilante type, so not scum, but not a "by the book" character either)

or the table spots are randomly assigned, so it'll be a mix of scum, power roles, vanilla townies

i don't think we have any indications yet which way it goes

Here, again...I can't help but being pinged by this. These posts are speculations about a setup we cannot know about. Basically, it's a waste of time. It makes me think that Homer is trying to look as if he's participating when actually he's bringing nothing to the table (giggles). (This, incidentally, is also my answer to jfm's question, which I think I understand now rereading the thread.)

Jfm goes in a similar category with his post following Homer's. But to a lesser extent.

Extreme Ways wrote:Also correct me if I'm wrong but in one post, it gets highlighted that I'm still voting Rag and I respond that it's a d1 vote and just a single vote - whatever.

In another post, Sonic says I am getting too invested over a single vote.

Rag/Sonic, what do you make of your ideas surrounding this?

unvote

I highlighted that you were still voting me. I think. I was just suffering from a broken heart. That was meant as banter. I'm not too sure I understand your question correctly. But, on another note, where have you gone?

In the interest of balance, Homer made a comment on EW that has nothing to do with setup but is slightly accusatory. That takes some of the scummy away.

kongming3 wrote:I read you loud and clear EW.

Wow...what is this?

EW came back to vote Son!c. I can't tell if EW is geuinely annoyed with Son!c because it's frustrating to be in the hot seat due to merit or because Son!c actually stumpled upon something.

Charle wrote:I just have a feeling that Sonic might be onto something, so I am going to follow him. In the same breath I really like EW's strategy to lynch day 1 so that we keep the first move with Town.

So in this case, Vote Devante

This "feeling". What is that based on?

SoN!c wrote:
And unvote

I rattled enough cages and know all i wanna know on D1.

Vote no lynch

Son!c, what the fudge? I had you down as town and then you back down as if you're scared to have blood on your hands. What gives with the unvote?

---
So, that gave me some insight, but not too much.

1. Son!c - I like the probing and the unfounded accusations because it brings stuff to the table. But the unvote at the end. No.
2. Ragian - IT idiot but beautiful town.
3. Extreme Ways - I still find EW's posts less sane than usual. I just can't tell if genuine annoyance or caught annoyance.
4. Charle - Charle goes with Son!c, which seemed off, but also questions Son!c's disappearance from the train. That's good.
5. TrafalgarLaw01 - Can't tell either or right now, but handed me victory last game, so that's a D1 pass
6. Devante - Not sure I understood the votes on Devante, but interestingly Son!c unvoted when it started getting serious.
7. kongming3 - Made the oddest comment so far IMO. I want to investigate that.
8. *pixar* - Seems usual Pixar hiding in the corner till the weather looks nicer.
9. Maxleod - AWOL, banned, drunk, whatevs...
10. homer_jay - Too invested in guessing at setup for my liking, but drew some of it back with his comment on EW liking him to Traf last game
11. jfm10 - similar to Homer and seemed to disappear again.
12. strike wolf - Has kept it VERY neat and must always be scrutinised.
13. Kingm - Has he posted? I can only find something about the goodie bag.

---

So, right now I want to poke at the following:
1) Son!c, what's with unvoting and going for no lynch? Feels like a flan in a cupboard.
2) EW, what is going on? Please explain your vote on Son!c and why kong is saying that he reads you loud and clear.
3) Kong, feel free to add to that stuff above.
4) Homer, how do you feel about the stuff going on so far? Do you actually think that EW is scummy?
5) King and Max, could you post, please?

That should be enough for now. Gotta work, too, unfortunately. Could everyone be as goodie two-shoes as me and copy-paste the players into a post commenting on them? I'm not saying we HAVE to lynch, though I prefer it, but we should at least get a claim.

Depending on the answers to the inquiries above, I will vote. If nothing happens, I think I'll vote Son!c or EW.

Extreme Ways wrote:Rag stinks

SoN!c wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:Rag stinks

After Charle flipped MAFIA COP it was obvious im realy the town sheriff
..
But if you can haggle your way out of this you deserve to win EW.

So haggle away.

Extreme Ways wrote:Question Sonic, why would someone aligned with the mafia antagonise you instead of appease you?

Extreme Ways wrote:Rag stinks

*Pixar* wrote:I trust our cop to at least get a claim out of him

Vote EW

Extreme Ways wrote:

*Pixar* wrote:I trust our cop to at least get a claim out of him

Vote EW

Do you trust our cop or do you agree with our cop?

Looks like you're just hiding behind Sonic

TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Well there is no much to say. i completely missed D2 but afret reading it seems Sonic made a call on Charle and got it right which justifies his claims and is the most solid option.

So really tempted to vote EW.

Holding for now just in case, don't want to rush things if we can find more info today. But what are the chances Cop gets 2 mafia in a row in the firsts 2 nights as well.

EW what is your role?

@EW the Nurse Role as I configured it would have protected only - not roleblocked too.
Apologies if anything I have configured causes confusion from what guests are accustomed to.

The Nurse role didn't come into play though as both Rag and Strike were killed same night.

Hooker - "chooses one player per Night to block from performing his or her night action".

Extreme Ways wrote:PS the nurse role I am familiar with, would indeed be a reason you survived but got no result.

I am anticipating either 2 factional mafia kills or a serial killer and 1 of the 2 protective roles saved someone night 1.

homer_jay wrote:

TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Well there is no much to say. i completely missed D2 but afret reading it seems Sonic made a call on Charle and got it right which justifies his claims and is the most solid option.

So really tempted to vote EW.

Holding for now just in case, don't want to rush things if we can find more info today. But what are the chances Cop gets 2 mafia in a row in the firsts 2 nights as well.

EW what is your role?

Sonic targeting EW is because of day 1 activity. Sonic has said that he got a "no result" when trying to investigate someone last night

waiting for an answer from EW. because he hasn't said much to make himself look innocent. mostly seems like deflecting to me

Extreme Ways wrote:Sonic, once you give thread your read on the people following you I will gladly self-vote to be out of this game.

Extreme Ways wrote:Sonic, once you give thread your read on the people following you I will gladly self-vote to be out of this game.

SoN!c wrote:And please explain why you would think Strike used nurse (the roleblock) on me (other then you - as scum -creating smoke).