Bad Speler wrote: Yeah, you still have Feedback and Assassin able to attack eachother.
okay thanks, ill fix that
Bad Speler wrote:edit2: I ran it through the xml checker and got this: Warning: Territory Cards Deck has border Card 3, but not vice versa
that just means that u can attack card 3 from the cards deck, but not the cards deck from card 3.... oh oops, are u supposed to be able to attack cards deck from card 3???
Bad Speler wrote:edit2: I ran it through the xml checker and got this: Warning: Territory Cards Deck has border Card 3, but not vice versa
that just means that u can attack card 3 from the cards deck, but not the cards deck from card 3.... oh oops, are u supposed to be able to attack cards deck from card 3???
Yes, you have it right for all the others.
Highest Score: 2532 Highest Position: 69 (a long time ago)
Bad Speler wrote:edit2: I ran it through the xml checker and got this: Warning: Territory Cards Deck has border Card 3, but not vice versa
that just means that u can attack card 3 from the cards deck, but not the cards deck from card 3.... oh oops, are u supposed to be able to attack cards deck from card 3???
I like the way this is looking! When this idea first came around, I wasn't to enthused...but I think you've won me over...as most maps do.
As it's quite late in the development, feel free to disregard this, but perhaps to keep with the CC theme...remove "War Expenses" and replace perhaps "Deadbeats" (that'd be a good -1, I think), or perhaps "Expired Premium"
AndyDufresne wrote:I like the way this is looking! When this idea first came around, I wasn't to enthused...but I think you've won me over...as most maps do.
As it's quite late in the development, feel free to disregard this, but perhaps to keep with the CC theme...remove "War Expenses" and replace perhaps "Deadbeats" (that'd be a good -1, I think), or perhaps "Expired Premium"
Otherwise, I like it.
--Andy
i like that idea, speler, want to do that? its just a quick fix in the xml, and if gilligan wants to do it he could
AndyDufresne wrote:As it's quite late in the development, feel free to disregard this, but perhaps to keep with the CC theme...remove "War Expenses" and replace perhaps "Deadbeats" (that'd be a good -1, I think), or perhaps "Expired Premium"
Otherwise, I like it.
--Andy
I like that. I couldn't think of anything that would fit there CC related, and there's one
AndyDufresne wrote:I like the way this is looking! When this idea first came around, I wasn't to enthused...but I think you've won me over...as most maps do.
As it's quite late in the development, feel free to disregard this, but perhaps to keep with the CC theme...remove "War Expenses" and replace perhaps "Deadbeats" (that'd be a good -1, I think), or perhaps "Expired Premium"
Otherwise, I like it.
--Andy
i like that idea, speler, want to do that? its just a quick fix in the xml, and if gilligan wants to do it he could
mibi wrote:why is premium -1? Seems like a bad marketing idea.
I thought of that too, but as gimil said it costs money for most people. The rough draft I made for this was before the shop, maybe we can change it to something to do with the shop as that also costs money.
And Gilligan and bryguy (you guys can fight over who gets this one ) we can change war expenses to deadbeats.
Highest Score: 2532 Highest Position: 69 (a long time ago)
Deadbeat and Shop Purchases are in. Shop purchase has the extra benefit of fitting (barely) on one line for the small map, allowing me to move the -1 on territory text into the square. edit: forgot to reflect those changes in the legend. edit 2: fixed
Last edited by Bad Speler on Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Highest Score: 2532 Highest Position: 69 (a long time ago)
Perhaps since deadbeat doesn't really involve any money (like war expenses did), you should alter the $. Perhaps a red X? Kind of like our scarlet letter for deadbeats. Or something.