Page 12 of 24

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 3:29 am
by Skittles!
Vote Count

Pika (2) - samlen, lovo

7 alive, 4 to lynch.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 5:40 am
by lord voldemort
It's the timing. Instead of coming out and saying who he blocked he asked who was blocked. I respond. And then he says yeah I blocked lovo.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 5:41 am
by Pikanchion
So you're willing to believe that you were blocked by somebody other than me who isn't counterclaiming?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 6:36 am
by Ragian
lord voldemort wrote:It's the timing. Instead of coming out and saying who he blocked he asked who was blocked. I respond. And then he says yeah I blocked lovo.

So are you saying that he's not a roleblocker, then?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 7:12 am
by nagerous
Lovo my name is Bussy Server (chef)

The other diner knows who they are I am waiting for them to post!!

I see what you are saying lovo but frenchie chan was blocked night one and pika is the only one claiming to have done so. I blocked chu but it didn't work I seems

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:00 am
by lord voldemort
I'm super concerned that the 2 you bussyd are scum partners. And that pika is an actual hooker. Explain his actions and why he'd block a town power role. And his unwillingness to provide his name. And the role of his dining partner

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:15 am
by Ragian
Who's the town power role?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Fri May 26, 2017 9:46 am
by Skoffin
I think LoVo is suggesting that Pika should know that LoVo is a town power role and thus only scum would target LoVo.

Based on what has been said and roles I am concluding that the 'dining partner' cannot be nag, Lovo, pika, myself or ragian. Leaving it to be Sam or chu. I'd assume chu because he hasn't posted, but why pick him again? If it's Sam then he knows pika's role and that makes his line of questioning more interesting. If it's not one of those two somehow then it must be ragian. HERTRST
Pika knows their role, while nag who knows their identity so it will be very quick to sort this out based on those two anyway.

LoVo, I don't understand why you find pika's admissions suspicious. He has already proved he can block and no one else has claimed to have picked you. He could be scum but he's not lying about the block.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 4:00 am
by Ragian
I wasn't at any dinner party. Honestly, I feel like all the fun is going on without me :(

This game has stalled, and I'm losing track of things. Right now I find LoVo most suspicious: I didn't like his play that much D2, and he is too concerned with appearing townie (or wanting everyone to think that he must be townie, if you prefer). Also, he's the only one who has killed someone.

Vote LoVo

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 7:26 am
by lord voldemort
If you're confused raigan then go back and re read and make some notes. I explained why I killed sh. I literally had no choice.
I'm not too concerned about appearing town. I claimed my full role already. You either buy it or you don't.

Need to hear from nag about his bussy (it's been long enough)
Want to hear from chu
And I want to hear a claim from pika (unless nag gives us something else to go on)

I feel like I'm the only one trying to put all this together :(

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 9:26 am
by Fircoal
nagerous wrote:I roleblocked pika with my bussy. He claims to have roleblocked lovo and succeeded. Lovo also claims to have been blocked and there was no NK.

Fircoal did you learn anything?


I did not learn anything.

Skoffin wrote:
Based on what has been said and roles I am concluding that the 'dining partner' cannot be nag, Lovo, pika, myself or ragian. Leaving it to be Sam or chu. I'd assume chu because he hasn't posted, but why pick him again?


Yup It's me.

Pika is a Roleblocker. Skittles did not tell me any more than that.

SO the question is more along the lines of what side is Pika on? He's not lying about what he is but he could be a bad guy. I'm not sure if he is though.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 2:00 pm
by Ragian
Fine. We're getting nowhere. Let's mass claim. Yes?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 1:36 am
by Samlen
Now that we know pika's role is just 'roleblocker' and not hooker, it might be safe for me to claim. Then again, not completely sure. I'm fine with mass claim, especially since we're stalling big time and now that I know pika is not specifically a hooker, i'm fine with finishing my claim. My second part is virgin. If I die, I can prevent a lynch, next night's kills, or let my enabled role perform two actions. I also was told that there was a hooker out there to get me to make me loose my powers. I wasn't certain if there were multiple hookers (considering our townname/theme) and only one was after me or if ga was the only one. Also, since one of my abilities can let voldemort use his action twice, i'm fairly certain he's town, like me.

Meant to bring this up earlier but ga was hooker/usurper/cult leader. Does this mean they were to usurp a cult leader instead? Or that they were a town-sided cult? Or a cult leader that could usurp the mafia godfather as claimed? I'm not quite certain which is the case, but the dead list has ga listed as town/cult. Do we actually have a mafia or just ga's cult, or was ga's cult limited to trying to recruit me, the virgin? There was a death n1 so probably is a mafia and I think a full powered cult woulda been too much to add into this game as well, so I think ga's cult was supposed to start with me or that the 'gf' that ga could usurp was really a cult leader.

Quick thoughts on players:
Town
Samlen - Push-Push-Push it - enabling virgin - connected to voldemort - obviously town
lordvoldemort - monopoly guy - dreaming god - enabled by samlen - would be very cruel if he wasn't town
nagerous - bussy server - chef - seems pretty town from actions

Not Clear
Skoffin - (no concrete claim) - Fake-claimed doc. Bit all over the place yesterday for seemingly no reason. Would very much like a roleclaim, though fakeclaim doctor does seem more like a bold townie move.
Ragian - no claim - Actions could be of any alignment imo. Would also like roleclaim.


Scummier charecters
Pika - (name?) - Roleblocker - claims to have blocked fircoal n1 and voldemort n2 (first didn't work according to fircoal but second one did according to Voldemort, though he claimed his target after voldemort revealed)
Fircoal -(name?) - (Investigative role?) - cleared dj before he died BUT was blocked by pika night 1 (night that they claimed let them see dj as cleared). Considering Pika has been pretty much confirmed roleblocker by now (good or bad). Actually maybe they were lying and trying to appear town by 'clearing' dj. Then again, pika says fircoal's not a killing role. Honestly not sure. Maybe both fircoal and pika are scum buddies? Purposefully contradicting each other to make one seem town when other is killed.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 7:27 am
by Ragian
unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 8:08 am
by Skoffin
I'll give you guys a tiny hint at what type of role I might be. Because I'm so cool, but also cause I got bored and my plans are probably foiled anyway.
I claimed doc to hopefully get counterclaimed, but I didn't. Booo. Shame I can't vote myself
I'm happy to plod along to see how right I am about things

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 8:55 am
by Ragian
You claimed doc because you are doc and you wanted to out someone lying, or you randomly claimed doc because you wanted to out any real doc?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:47 am
by lord voldemort
unvote, vote skoffin

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:48 am
by Ragian
Care to add some words to that vote?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:49 am
by lord voldemort
i think trying to get a doc claim out of town early day 1/2 is a pretty big scum tell as any

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:54 am
by Ragian
I agree, but what if she's the actual doc and just phrased it poorly?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 2:54 pm
by Pikanchion
Well one of my two top suspects is trying to start a train on the other one it appears, the fact that Skoffin has definitely been lying one way or the other and claimed to know exactly why nobody was killed last night is also highly suspicious in that context. I'm willing to trust Samlen on lord voldemort for now, as their roleclaim certainly explains their prior wariness around my role, so...

Vote: Skoffin

Did you actually have any reason to believe scum would counterclaim you from your role description Skoffin? -If not I don't at all buy that you were lying for that reason.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 8:41 pm
by Samlen
Ragian wrote:unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?

I already had a vote on pika before the post, didn't think i needed to change it yet since I'm quite certain either pika or fircoal is scum and maybe both. I've been getting more and more jester vibes actually from skoffin, though my other theory is they had something in place already to protect themselves last night, not the doc (if we even have one).

Does anyone else have any thoughts on what the dealio is with ga's role? Could the other three of you guys actually claim? You started the massclaim idea, ragian, why not claim as well?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 9:41 pm
by Skoffin
II'm having a hard time resisting slapping you muppets with a fish and pointing out what I obviously meant. It's really hurting my inner pedant.

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 4:13 am
by Ragian
Samlen wrote:
Ragian wrote:unvote

Decent post, Samlen. I find myself in agreement. Now, why didn't you vote?

I already had a vote on pika before the post, didn't think i needed to change it yet since I'm quite certain either pika or fircoal is scum and maybe both. I've been getting more and more jester vibes actually from skoffin, though my other theory is they had something in place already to protect themselves last night, not the doc (if we even have one).

Does anyone else have any thoughts on what the dealio is with ga's role? Could the other three of you guys actually claim? You started the massclaim idea, ragian, why not claim as well?

Oh, you already voted. It's good that I'm not skimming...

And yes, I started the mass claim idea, but I would reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally like for skoffin to start. And then I want Pika to give us his name claim.

I've lost track. What's the vote count?

Re: No Theme Mafia - Day 3, let's protect the bussy

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 4:37 am
by Skoffin
My name is Mitch