Conquer Club

spiesr wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:Jonty, I side with you. That is the best you get until he answers

Care to explain this? Jonty hasn't had any substantial position for a while now, did you type the wrong name? If not explain what you are siding with him on.

Yeah, I've been sitting on the fence, until now. But now, I'm shifting towards voting Nark. Nark give a defense to Mets' accusation, or me votes you.

JamesKer1 wrote:I'm not sure about epic. I'll have to think on that.

Well, epic has had pretty weak gameplay the whole time. I don't think D2 should end before either epic is replaced, or comes back to play for real.

Metsfanmax wrote:

JamesKer1 wrote:I'm not sure about epic. I'll have to think on that.

Well, epic has had pretty weak gameplay the whole time. I don't think D2 should end before either epic is replaced, or comes back to play for real.

totally agree i would prefer a replacement, Get someone more active in, cause epic has been one-lining most of the time, and i believe it is his playing style, i rather have a more involved player instead.

If you all don't mind a noob replacement, I'd volunteer... I've already read this whole thread while bored at work lol.

The reason i voted lootifier was this quote ( I was)

Lootifer wrote:I am a vanilla townie #X*. I was told that on day X* there would be X* mafia alive (X is intentionally the same number I think), I was not allowed to disclose this information until day 2.

How can you know, there are uncertainties right? for instance us killing a mafia. only thing i could imagine is that you know how many mafia where alive day 1, (which you say is 1, to which i agree) but for any other day we could have killed a mafia so how can you deduce it?

answers given later make sense and add up to my intel so unvote

EBWOP:

virus90 wrote:The reason i voted lootifier was this quote ( I was)

Lootifer wrote:I am a vanilla townie #X*. I was told that on day X* there would be X* mafia alive (X is intentionally the same number I think), I was not allowed to disclose this information until day 2.

How can you know, there are uncertainties right? for instance us killing a mafia. only thing i could imagine is that you know how many mafia where alive day 1, (which you say is 1, to which i agree) but for any other day we could have killed a mafia so how can you deduce it?

answers given later make sense and add up to my intel so unvote

thought i removed the sentence since i already figured it out myself. sorry.

virus90 wrote:The reason i voted lootifier was this quote ( I was)

Lootifer wrote:I am a vanilla townie #X*. I was told that on day X* there would be X* mafia alive (X is intentionally the same number I think), I was not allowed to disclose this information until day 2.

How can you know, there are uncertainties right? for instance us killing a mafia. only thing i could imagine is that you know how many mafia where alive day 1, (which you say is 1, to which i agree) but for any other day we could have killed a mafia so how can you deduce it?

answers given later make sense and add up to my intel so unvote

Yeah, it doesn't really make sense to me either -- but isn't that what this game is about? Perhaps James has some weird things thrown in there -- like, town are automatically converted to mafia at a certain point, or mafia automatically die. You have to think outside the box for this game.

jonty125 wrote:

spiesr wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:Jonty, I side with you. That is the best you get until he answers

Care to explain this? Jonty hasn't had any substantial position for a while now, did you type the wrong name? If not explain what you are siding with him on.

Yeah, I've been sitting on the fence, until now. But now, I'm shifting towards voting Nark. Nark give a defense to Mets' accusation, or me votes you.

Jonty, didn't you forget something in this post?

That is why you should trust me, dude...

To everyone else, I have nothing to say to defend myself, because I don't feel I need to... Lootifer and Spiesr are still the bad guys in my eyes, and, until the day cop proves me wrong, I will continue to argue the same points.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

jonty125 wrote:

spiesr wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:Jonty, I side with you. That is the best you get until he answers

Care to explain this? Jonty hasn't had any substantial position for a while now, did you type the wrong name? If not explain what you are siding with him on.

Yeah, I've been sitting on the fence, until now. But now, I'm shifting towards voting Nark. Nark give a defense to Mets' accusation, or me votes you.

Jonty, didn't you forget something in this post?

That is why you should trust me, dude...

To everyone else, I have nothing to say to defend myself, because I don't feel I need to... Lootifer and Spiesr are still the bad guys in my eyes, and, until the day cop proves me wrong, I will continue to argue the same points.

Town. Town.

Town. vote Nark for been unwilling to provide a defense I reckon he gave me this PR (tongue in cheek)

jonty125 wrote:Town. vote Nark for been unwilling to provide a defense I reckon he gave me this PR (tongue in cheek)

Oh my God... I told you what I did so you would know why you could trust me, and instead you vote me??? You also outed my role, when no one else may have figured it out...

You know what, this is ridiculous...

Vote: Anarkistsdream

These are some ridiculous post restrictions.

Unvote Nark in case he's a jester

dont think there are jesters, not a "fun" game in anyone's book i guess..

Metsfanmax wrote:These are some ridiculous post restrictions.

Unvote Nark in case he's a jester

There would have been better post restrictions if the players that received them weren't whining little numbskulls. And, I had awesome post restrictions, which would have actually given us information, but they were not allowed.

I can force people to admit their alignment... But, only if they are town.

Hence, my earlier comment... I am not a Vanilla Townie... But I am not a Power Role... This role could be exceptionally powerful, but I can apparently be vetoed by either the mod or the player who I give the PR to, so what is really the point?

I have no intention of making someone say Flamingos in every post... Why? Because it doesn't help the game at all.

So, go ahead... Vote me... I am town... And I was outed by the person who should have trusted me... Whatever.

Anarkistsdream wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:These are some ridiculous post restrictions.

Unvote Nark in case he's a jester

There would have been better post restrictions if the players that received them weren't whining little numbskulls. And, I had awesome post restrictions, which would have actually given us information, but they were not allowed.

I can force people to admit their alignment... But, only if they are town.

Hence, my earlier comment... I am not a Vanilla Townie... But I am not a Power Role... This role could be exceptionally powerful, but I can apparently be vetoed by either the mod or the player who I give the PR to, so what is really the point?

I have no intention of making someone say Flamingos in every post... Why? Because it doesn't help the game at all.

So, go ahead... Vote me... I am town... And I was outed by the person who should have trusted me... Whatever.

Nark has been WARNED. This was not a forced claim.

Not forced, but necessary to make my case with Jonty.

Here is your rule...

Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities.

I did not quote anything... And you even say I can say associated abilities... Please explain how I broke ANY rule.

Anarkistsdream wrote:Here is your rule...

Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities.

I did not quote anything... And you even say I can say associated abilities... Please explain how I broke ANY rule.

There was a PM agreement we had. Warning stands.

JamesKer1 wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:Here is your rule...

Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities.

I did not quote anything... And you even say I can say associated abilities... Please explain how I broke ANY rule.

There was a PM agreement we had. Warning stands.

Very well.

TOWNIES

@ James: Can we talk about the post you have put a warning on?

Also @ virus the number X is not 1 as I have previously stated. However it was noted in the future prediction I was given that X is only accurate in the case when mafia do not get lynched or killed.

All.... Regardless of the above posts, everything I have said about Lootifer and Spiesr holds true, and NONE of you have done anything to dissuade me... Do you all think maybe you could try to dissuade me, and, if not, then that means you should vote WITH me??? C'mon, folks...

James, isn't our deadline tomorrow. So that night falls over Thanksgiving?

Also, what is up with replacing Epic Pie?

Anarkistsdream wrote:All.... Regardless of the above posts, everything I have said about Lootifer and Spiesr holds true, and NONE of you have done anything to dissuade me... Do you all think maybe you could try to dissuade me, and, if not, then that means you should vote WITH me??? C'mon, folks...

James, isn't our deadline tomorrow. So that night falls over Thanksgiving?

Also, what is up with replacing Epic Pie?

Lootifer's claim is solid, I don't see the issue there. As for Spiesr, he may or may not be town. I doubted him though which is why I have had my vote on him since the beginning if the day...

So far in my mind the only confirmed Townies are myself, nark, and lootifer.

Question for you nark if James allows. Only town is forced to say their alignment every time they post? Who have you used the ability on so far? Assuming you're allowed to answer that since we can't just pretend we don't have that info anymore.

I'm being called away early, as in leaving right now, since something came up. Hotshot will replace epic, and I'll get the PM to him shortly. You can ask whatever questions of nark that you want, however, I remind him to use discretion in answering them. I'm hoping to have access some of the time, but that may not exist, and it may be for me only to play games that my sitter isn't allowed to.

Happy Early Holidays. No one from this point until Monday will be held to two day posting requirements. I was hoping for night at this point, but it didn't end up adding up.

Anarkistsdream wrote:I can force people to admit their alignment... But, only if they are town.

Hence, my earlier comment... I am not a Vanilla Townie... But I am not a Power Role... This role could be exceptionally powerful, but I can apparently be vetoed by either the mod or the player who I give the PR to, so what is really the point?

Why would you have used it on jonty instead of me? You only need to know my alignment as I have already claimed, so it strikes me as odd that you wouldnt confirm via this means rather than waste a daycop action (half of day-role-cop report on me would be redundant).

@ Kratos I am not sold that Nark is town; what are you basing your assumption on?

Lootifer wrote:

Anarkistsdream wrote:I can force people to admit their alignment... But, only if they are town.

Hence, my earlier comment... I am not a Vanilla Townie... But I am not a Power Role... This role could be exceptionally powerful, but I can apparently be vetoed by either the mod or the player who I give the PR to, so what is really the point?

Why would you have used it on jonty instead of me? You only need to know my alignment as I have already claimed, so it strikes me as odd that you wouldnt confirm via this means rather than waste a daycop action (half of day-role-cop report on me would be redundant).

@ Kratos I am not sold that Nark is town; what are you basing your assumption on?

I'm basing my assumption on knowing that there was only 1 mafia alive yesterday who was likely a recruiter so I wouldn't imagine he would have additional powers on top of that. Also, that would be a useless role for mafia to have seeing as they would already know who is town and who isn't town. Finally there is some confirmation in his role seeing as Nark used his role on jonty and was even warned for sharing it likely adding to the confirmation that it is actually his role. Unless this game is all sorts of screwed up.