Conquer Club

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:46 am**

I would prefer to propound the "expose, and burn at the stake" pov

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:05 am**

Anonymity is better. Publishing the results would just make pre-existing grudges further developed and perhaps I'm being cynical here but I'd imagine that in later power ranking charts there is a possibility of revenge voting developing.

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:23 am**

I will never host this publically, I think everyone can agree that if these votes were hosted publically then there would be a lot of people in here critiquing other people's votes. That is exactly what we don't want. Remember, a vote like this represents a collective perception of what everyone thinks the clan is, it really doesn't represent the actual strength of a clan. And each person/clan that votes is entitled to their perception of it without being harassed by others for it as long as their vote doesn't seem malicious, which is what Dako, Incandenza and I check for. Like Lubawski said, there were a few outliers, but nothing too extreme. Like the last round of votes I did, I took out the highest and lowest score from every clan in order to eliminate any extreme outliers that are not even close to matching what everyone else thought and skew the results. I think the results are really pretty good and will be up very soon.

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:02 pm**

Yaaaaaaay!

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:40 pm**

JoshyBoy wrote:Yaaaaaaay!

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:36 pm**

reptile wrote:
JoshyBoy wrote:Yaaaaaaay!

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:45 pm**

very soon.... 3 weeks later... **Crickets**

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:05 pm**

chemefreak wrote:
nagerous wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:See no reason why they should. 2010 was a good year for them, with strong performances in both Cup and League. They have an outstanding player in their ranks who, if available for all future challenges, makes them possibly the most formidable opponent.

Josko?

Laughed so hard captain 'n coke came out my nose! It burns!

Say what you want about Josko, but anybody who has played vs him knows he is a very keen player as are many in KORT. I am glad not to be playing vs him in clan matches.

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:49 pm**

Bruceswar wrote:
chemefreak wrote:
nagerous wrote:
Chariot of Fire wrote:See no reason why they should. 2010 was a good year for them, with strong performances in both Cup and League. They have an outstanding player in their ranks who, if available for all future challenges, makes them possibly the most formidable opponent.

Josko?

Laughed so hard captain 'n coke came out my nose! It burns!

Say what you want about Josko, but anybody who has played vs him knows he is a very keen player as are many in KORT. I am glad not to be playing vs him in clan matches.

Well, that is because you are not that good bruce.

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:52 pm**

Blitzaholic wrote:Well, that is because you are not that good bruce.

Thats pretty low Blitz. Belittling others is a real step up for you eh? :roll:

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:58 pm**

Blitzaholic wrote:Well, that is because you are not that good bruce.

Shame you had to go there blitz... :shock:

6-1 vs THOTA in this war... That is all I will say to that

Posted: **Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:52 pm**

Bruceswar wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:Well, that is because you are not that good bruce.

Shame you had to go there blitz... 6-1 vs THOTA in this war... That is all I will say to that

I think it was a joke, and yeah, josko is top notch skill wise.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:21 am**

Just out of curiosity how many days does whoever is in your private group of over viewing the rankings have to check for corrections or whatever you do? I dont see the point of it taking more than 24 hours.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:16 am**

Maybe next time Blitz could do it. He's damned efficient at this kind of stuff, and if anyone wants to run a tourney based on rankings/seeds they could simply work off his list.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:34 am**

Chariot of Fire wrote:Maybe next time Blitz could do it. He's damned efficient at this kind of stuff, and if anyone wants to run a tourney based on rankings/seeds they could simply work off his list.

You have to have a non biased list to run something like this ie votes or math. A list comprised by one person is well just one persons opinion. I dont think that would be the way to run something as important as this

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:21 am**

First post has been updated with the new rankings. Enjoy!

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:25 am**

They suck. Booo!

Just kidding, thanks for the update Chuuuuck.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:29 am**

Booo!

Lol, At least we stay in the top 10. ID's jump was a surprise, not really sure where that came from.
The only other point of note at the current glance would be DB being below aod and bpb.

Otherwise, Grim reapers couldn't get an acronym?

Nice work with the rankings, looks good =D>

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:37 am**

Yay! Lowest deviation and passed #2 average rank! Fear us, THOTA :D.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:40 am**

l4d move one place up

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:40 am**

Wooot wooot! Go Nemesis!

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:41 am**

Disappointing we dropped after the decent year we had, but I guess I'll survive.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:47 am**

I can't believe it.... It's finally here

Thanks for your hard work, Chuck.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:09 pm**

Well It was what I expected. We just need to beat some more higher ranking clans to move up. I hope we move up.

Posted: **Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:38 pm**

doesnt look too bad, thanks for the update chuck.

TSM must be happy considering they sat out all last year and still ended up #4 lol

Conquer Club

Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings

Re: Power Rankings