Page 104 of 112
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:12 pm
by spurgistan
My main man Maroney? Kool-Aid.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:24 pm
by Incandenza
spurgistan wrote:My main man Maroney? Kool-Aid.
Somehow I doubt that.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:35 am
by FiveThreeEight
Could it be McGahee?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:58 am
by spurgistan
Incandenza wrote:spurgistan wrote:My main man Maroney? Kool-Aid.
Somehow I doubt that.

Dammit. I've been a lazy fan the last few weeks.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:10 pm
by Cheesemore
No one yet (I guess I have a good question here) ok here's 2 hints
1) He's on a below .500 team
2) He's in the AFC West
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:21 pm
by FiveThreeEight
I just read an article by Bill Simmons, and I think I have the answer. I would feel like I cheated, though, so I will wait a little bit.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:53 pm
by misterman10
That pretty much gives it away Cheesemore. San Diego and Denver are both over .500, and Kansas City has nobody.
It's Justin Fargus of the Oakland Raiders.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:54 pm
by Gold Knight
misterman10 wrote:That pretty much gives it away Cheesemore. San Diego and Denver are both over .500, and Kansas City has nobody.
It's Justin Fargus of the Oakland Raiders.
Ahem, it Justin Farg
as...

[/b]
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:54 pm
by misterman10
Gold Knight wrote:misterman10 wrote:That pretty much gives it away Cheesemore. San Diego and Denver are both over .500, and Kansas City has nobody.
It's Justin Fargus of the Oakland Raiders.
Ahem, it Justin F
argus...

That's what I put.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:55 pm
by Gold Knight
Highlighted the wrong a, wierd you check the same time...
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:56 pm
by misterman10
Gold Knight wrote:Highlighted the wrong a, weird you check the same time...
Ahem, its w
eird.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:01 pm
by Cheesemore
misterman10 wrote:That pretty much gives it away Cheesemore. San Diego and Denver are both over .500, and Kansas City has nobody.
It's Justin Fargus of the Oakland Raiders.
Correct, I thought that was a relatively easy question, I didn't think it would take that long
Justin rushed for 591 yards in those weeks (Ryan Grant was #2, he ran for about 560 yards)
You're up MM10
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:45 pm
by Gold Knight
Actually Cheesemore, Grant is the leader since week 8. Where did you get this question from? Grant has 717 rushing yards while Fargas only has 648...
Might want to recheck, i looked to ESPN for this one...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statistics?stat=rush&season=2&year=2007
Just add up the rushing totals since week 8.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:47 pm
by misterman10
I think it may depend where you end the stats. Cheesemore said from week 8-13, so that may be where the confusion is coming from.
Anyways, next question, should be pretty easy:
In one of the closest races in Heisman history, what Quarterback lost by only 76 points in the 2000 Heisman voting?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:52 pm
by djt5483
michael vick
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:05 pm
by misterman10
djt5483 wrote:michael vick
Good guess, but nope, it was not Michael Vick.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:11 pm
by Incandenza
Peyton?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:26 pm
by misterman10
Maybe I was wrong, I guess its not as easy as I thought it would be, as the guy's name is fairly unknown.
And nope, it wasn't Peyton.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:31 pm
by FiveThreeEight
I know he played for Oklamhoma. I can't remember his damn name!
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:18 am
by Incandenza
Would you perhaps be thinking of Jason White?
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:24 am
by got tonkaed
i think jason white is too late for it to be the answer....seemingly if its an oklahoma guy it might be josh heupel or however you spell that last name of his.
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:32 am
by FiveThreeEight
It's not White. The guy had a weird last name. DAMN IT!!!
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:34 am
by got tonkaed
FiveThreeEight wrote:It's not White. The guy had a weird last name. DAMN IT!!!
im about 100000 percent sure the oklahoma qb you are looking for is heupel
so i guess he probably finished second.
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:45 am
by FiveThreeEight
That's it! It was on the tip of my tongue. I remember him because of his name. My friend's and I went on for about a week cracking jokes about his name.
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:48 am
by got tonkaed
eh ill post my question now then, and if heupel turns out to be wrong, feel free to make fun of me....
Name one of the few fighters who successfully held belts in three of the orignal 8 boxing divisions, specifically middleweight, light heavyweight, and heavyweight. I can think of 2 specifically and probably a third on a technicality.