Page 11 of 16
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:01 pm
by asl80
looking good cairns, good job.
keep the crowns!
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:50 am
by cairnswk
asl80 wrote:looking good cairns, good job.
keep the crowns!
yes them's my thoughts also
now...where's that Gimil character???
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:44 am
by yeti_c
I think the Crowns clash a bit - and in Cyprus it almost disappears.
C.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:47 am
by Ogrecrusher
I also don't like the crowns
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:05 pm
by cairnswk
yeti_c wrote:I think the Crowns clash a bit - and in Cyprus it almost disappears.
C.
Ogrecrusher wrote:I also don't like the crowns
I am not doing a poll for this one.
Final. The crowns stay.
I believe they are perfectly clear.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V15 w/ armies
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:14 am
by cairnswk
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:22 am
by cairnswk
Gimil, calling Gimil where are you?
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:07 am
by Ogrecrusher
Why is the land on the far side of the Caspian sea not greyed out as non-playable?
Also, is the sea route from Alexandria one way?
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:30 pm
by cairnswk
Ogrecrusher wrote:Why is the land on the far side of the Caspian sea not greyed out as non-playable?
Also, is the sea route from Alexandria one way?
1. Because that piece of land doesn't matter to this particular gameplay and i thought it looked better with the orange, but i have changed it just for you because i was feeling nice this morning, please refresh your browser.
2. i don't mean to be offensive, but do you need glasses, can't you see that is a one-way arrow?
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 5:53 pm
by Ogrecrusher
cairnswk wrote:Ogrecrusher wrote:Why is the land on the far side of the Caspian sea not greyed out as non-playable?
Also, is the sea route from Alexandria one way?
1. Because that piece of land doesn't matter to this particular gameplay and i thought it looked better with the orange, but i have changed it just for you because i was feeling nice this morning, please refresh your browser.
2. i don't mean to be offensive, but do you need glasses, can't you see that is a one-way arrow?
Heh. I assumed it was one way, I just wanted to check
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:12 am
by cairnswk
Ogrecrusher wrote:...
Heh. I assumed it was one way, I just wanted to check
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 1:55 am
by Incandenza
So I know you've gotten your gameplay stamp, thus you can tell me to take a long walk off a short pier if you don't like the following, but here it is: why not combine the italians and french into one 2-terit +1 bonus?
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 3:20 am
by cairnswk
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:17 am
by cairnswk
still waiting on graphics stamp from gimil or other CA.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:33 am
by gimil
cairnswk wrote:still waiting on graphics stamp from gimil or other CA.
Sorry for the delay cairns, just finished my last exam no more than 20 minutes ago studying has took much of my attention.
A few things look a little out of synch on this computer, but it may be that this computer im on just now (on in my university) hasn't got very good resolution on a large minitor. If I remeber correctly it wasn't anything like what I am seeing just now on another monitor. So for the time being I will stamp it and check it again later on a better computer when i get the chance!
Well done old buddy.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:36 am
by cairnswk
gimil wrote:....
Well done old buddy.
Thank you Gimil....let's hope you get some connectivity back again soon.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:37 am
by gimil
cairnswk wrote:gimil wrote:....
Well done old buddy.
Thank you Gimil....let's hope you get some connectivity back again soon.
I head home on the 19th of december. Full connection for 7 weeks. See you soon
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V15 w/ armies
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:27 am
by cairnswk
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:15 am
by yeti_c
yeti_c wrote:I think the Crowns clash a bit - and in Cyprus it almost disappears.
C.
I still think this is a concern.
C.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:20 am
by cairnswk
yeti_c wrote:yeti_c wrote:I think the Crowns clash a bit - and in Cyprus it almost disappears.
C.
I still think this is a concern.
C.
I don't
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:46 pm
by topukluayakkabi
The city shown in the map "Constantinople" is NOT correct. It is "Istanbul"!
You need to correct this mistake!
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:31 pm
by cairnswk
topukluayakkabi wrote:The city shown in the map "Constantinople" is NOT correct. It is "Istanbul"!
You need to correct this mistake!
And what makes you say that, please expand on your reasoning if you are going to make comments such as these.
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:35 pm
by the.killing.44
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I,Gp,Gr] V15(p15) - W/ Armies
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:50 pm
by cairnswk
no, but i will....
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_IstanbulRepublic of Turkey
Main article: Turkey
When the Republic of Turkey was founded by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on October 29, 1923, the capital was moved from Istanbul to Ankara.
The city's Turkish name İstanbul was already in popular use among the local population, but the international name Constantinople also remained in use until the Turkish Postal Services Law of March 28, 1930, according to which all foreign countries were asked to solely use the name Istanbul also in their languages and their postal service networks.
Therefore, on the basis of this quote above and the maps, i would be inclined to stick with Constantinople
Re: WWI: OTTOMAN EMPIRE [I] V15 w/ armies
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:51 pm
by cairnswk
